F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Fast performance and optimal settings for RAM.

Fast performance and optimal settings for RAM.

Fast performance and optimal settings for RAM.

M
miniyonce16
Member
202
10-08-2019, 02:38 AM
#1
I achieved running my cl19 3733 Hyper X kit at 3600 cl16 with settings 16-19-19-39 on 1.4v, though it wouldn’t boot at 1.35v. These numbers seem similar to the Trident Neo 3600 cl16 lineup. Would this perform well for gaming and with a Ryzen 5 3600?
M
miniyonce16
10-08-2019, 02:38 AM #1

I achieved running my cl19 3733 Hyper X kit at 3600 cl16 with settings 16-19-19-39 on 1.4v, though it wouldn’t boot at 1.35v. These numbers seem similar to the Trident Neo 3600 cl16 lineup. Would this perform well for gaming and with a Ryzen 5 3600?

R
Redstoner137
Posting Freak
811
10-08-2019, 04:12 AM
#2
This is quite satisfactory.
R
Redstoner137
10-08-2019, 04:12 AM #2

This is quite satisfactory.

S
SmooveAimbot
Junior Member
5
10-12-2019, 08:22 PM
#3
Sure, I've confirmed the stability. For testing RAM and comparing performance, I recommend using tools like MemTest86 or Windows Memory Diagnostic. They provide reliable scans and detailed reports. You can also check apps such as HWMonitor or Speccy for real-time monitoring and benchmarking.
S
SmooveAimbot
10-12-2019, 08:22 PM #3

Sure, I've confirmed the stability. For testing RAM and comparing performance, I recommend using tools like MemTest86 or Windows Memory Diagnostic. They provide reliable scans and detailed reports. You can also check apps such as HWMonitor or Speccy for real-time monitoring and benchmarking.

K
kungfutyla
Posting Freak
780
10-13-2019, 03:29 AM
#4
Karthu Memtest TM5 includes the advanced Aida 64 benchmark with an extreme setting. It emphasizes speed differences, suggesting older timing methods have better performance compared to newer ones.
K
kungfutyla
10-13-2019, 03:29 AM #4

Karthu Memtest TM5 includes the advanced Aida 64 benchmark with an extreme setting. It emphasizes speed differences, suggesting older timing methods have better performance compared to newer ones.

A
axsthetiic
Member
218
10-13-2019, 03:50 AM
#5
Your result of 70.5ns is solid for a 3600 CL16 kit. It falls within the typical range for high-speed testing.
A
axsthetiic
10-13-2019, 03:50 AM #5

Your result of 70.5ns is solid for a 3600 CL16 kit. It falls within the typical range for high-speed testing.

M
master_scope
Posting Freak
794
10-20-2019, 10:20 PM
#6
The latency on the old 3733MHz CL19 profile is typically lower, offering smoother performance compared to newer standards.
M
master_scope
10-20-2019, 10:20 PM #6

The latency on the old 3733MHz CL19 profile is typically lower, offering smoother performance compared to newer standards.

H
H3dgehog_
Member
81
10-27-2019, 02:27 PM
#7
72 or 71.5
H
H3dgehog_
10-27-2019, 02:27 PM #7

72 or 71.5

X
xStriKed
Member
212
10-28-2019, 03:11 PM
#8
No, it isn't always ideal timing.
X
xStriKed
10-28-2019, 03:11 PM #8

No, it isn't always ideal timing.