F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Extended Wi-Fi Network Device/Access Point

Extended Wi-Fi Network Device/Access Point

Extended Wi-Fi Network Device/Access Point

J
jxzuzuzo
Posting Freak
750
09-12-2021, 06:35 AM
#1
J
jxzuzuzo
09-12-2021, 06:35 AM #1

T
TheRealShrub
Senior Member
409
09-12-2021, 03:09 PM
#2
If you're only needing a connection, set up an access point. For broader coverage consider a mesh network with separate backhaul connections (such as Orbi) to extend reach. Still, standard gear can match performance, particularly with modern 802.11ax (WiFi 6) equipment featuring advanced antennas. More details: ISM channels are capped at half a watt for unlicensed use (like without an amateur license). This limits options, so improve range by using stronger radios, refined filtering, and better antennas focused in the desired direction. Enhanced software and powerful processors help extract signals from close to interference. Optimized WAPs support these features and offer cost efficiency, allowing more investment in overall performance. For example, a single WAP can cover half an acre indoors when properly placed, though signal drops in basements due to flat antenna patterns. As I transition to 802.11ax, better auto-antenna systems may help, but current options aren’t perfect for all setups.
T
TheRealShrub
09-12-2021, 03:09 PM #2

If you're only needing a connection, set up an access point. For broader coverage consider a mesh network with separate backhaul connections (such as Orbi) to extend reach. Still, standard gear can match performance, particularly with modern 802.11ax (WiFi 6) equipment featuring advanced antennas. More details: ISM channels are capped at half a watt for unlicensed use (like without an amateur license). This limits options, so improve range by using stronger radios, refined filtering, and better antennas focused in the desired direction. Enhanced software and powerful processors help extract signals from close to interference. Optimized WAPs support these features and offer cost efficiency, allowing more investment in overall performance. For example, a single WAP can cover half an acre indoors when properly placed, though signal drops in basements due to flat antenna patterns. As I transition to 802.11ax, better auto-antenna systems may help, but current options aren’t perfect for all setups.

O
ownist
Member
177
09-13-2021, 11:51 PM
#3
I can't tell you how much I appreciate your detailed answer. This has been a pain in the ass since I started with it. This is a large home on 3 levels and I am frankly amazed that I have gotten away with that Asus AC-5300 and a single Netgear EX8000 extender. I am the point of not caring such that the wife is pleased. All of my hardware is hardwired (funny sentence). There is going to be ethernet work on the house as AT&T is installing fiber to the door in my neighborhood. Any feelings on Ubiquiti? Again, thank you.
O
ownist
09-13-2021, 11:51 PM #3

I can't tell you how much I appreciate your detailed answer. This has been a pain in the ass since I started with it. This is a large home on 3 levels and I am frankly amazed that I have gotten away with that Asus AC-5300 and a single Netgear EX8000 extender. I am the point of not caring such that the wife is pleased. All of my hardware is hardwired (funny sentence). There is going to be ethernet work on the house as AT&T is installing fiber to the door in my neighborhood. Any feelings on Ubiquiti? Again, thank you.

K
kaden500
Member
57
09-14-2021, 04:01 PM
#4
Many folks favor Ubiquiti, yet in my view their performance doesn't match the price. From a quality standpoint, they're in the mid-range for consumers, but they provide enterprise capabilities that most consumer gear misses. Even though it's pricier, alternatives like an Orbi or a Netgear Insight with VLANs deliver superior value and better long-term support. With three tiers and no budget limits, I'd install a WAP on each tier connected to a PoE switch, or opt for Orbi (Orbi Pro for VLANs) and place one per tier, positioning the router centrally.
K
kaden500
09-14-2021, 04:01 PM #4

Many folks favor Ubiquiti, yet in my view their performance doesn't match the price. From a quality standpoint, they're in the mid-range for consumers, but they provide enterprise capabilities that most consumer gear misses. Even though it's pricier, alternatives like an Orbi or a Netgear Insight with VLANs deliver superior value and better long-term support. With three tiers and no budget limits, I'd install a WAP on each tier connected to a PoE switch, or opt for Orbi (Orbi Pro for VLANs) and place one per tier, positioning the router centrally.

T
Ticou
Junior Member
36
09-15-2021, 07:04 PM
#5
I've been using Ubiquiti for about four years now. It offers a solid upgrade over typical consumer gear while adding enterprise capabilities. I appreciate the absence of yearly licensing charges and how well compatible devices work with the UniFi Controller. Although some users might miss the direct manufacturer support, it helps keep costs down. This depends on your view of performance and quality. Honestly, I think their hardware is quite reliable. For me, the speed is outstanding at both sites: one uses 30Mbps/6Mbps cable, the other 100Mbps/50Mbps fiber, both with U6-Lites linked to Switch Lite PoEs and managed remotely via CloudKeys (gen2). These setups are installed in solid buildings, including multi-level homes. Prices vary based on requirements; budget-friendly models suit most people. But if you're targeting the prosumer segment, you'll need to research your needs carefully, which can raise the overall cost. Ubiquiti isn't for everyone. If you already know that, it's likely your needs have surpassed what they offer. That's okay. With more companies offering subscription-free hardware—like Ruckus Unleashed, Aruba Instant-On, EnGenius—there are even more choices to explore.
T
Ticou
09-15-2021, 07:04 PM #5

I've been using Ubiquiti for about four years now. It offers a solid upgrade over typical consumer gear while adding enterprise capabilities. I appreciate the absence of yearly licensing charges and how well compatible devices work with the UniFi Controller. Although some users might miss the direct manufacturer support, it helps keep costs down. This depends on your view of performance and quality. Honestly, I think their hardware is quite reliable. For me, the speed is outstanding at both sites: one uses 30Mbps/6Mbps cable, the other 100Mbps/50Mbps fiber, both with U6-Lites linked to Switch Lite PoEs and managed remotely via CloudKeys (gen2). These setups are installed in solid buildings, including multi-level homes. Prices vary based on requirements; budget-friendly models suit most people. But if you're targeting the prosumer segment, you'll need to research your needs carefully, which can raise the overall cost. Ubiquiti isn't for everyone. If you already know that, it's likely your needs have surpassed what they offer. That's okay. With more companies offering subscription-free hardware—like Ruckus Unleashed, Aruba Instant-On, EnGenius—there are even more choices to explore.

A
Aldrin10
Member
62
09-23-2021, 07:18 AM
#6
I estimate the 5-year licensing expense as part of the total cost of ownership. If a system lacks an annual charge, it’s fine; otherwise, it should be included when determining the purchase price. This applies to dedicated controllers too—they simply add up to the overall budget. When evaluating total costs, these figures must be accounted for. Another aspect often overlooked is the switching equipment and power supplies, typically using a PoE switch for both. From a quality standpoint, consider aspects like radio filtering and range in challenging environments. For comparable performance to their $200 WAPs, I can opt for a $100 WAP from Cisco that offers controller-like management, including clustering. Alternatively, investing $250–$300 over five years could provide superior hardware and enhanced management capabilities. For many users, Ubiquiti works adequately, but they often charge more than necessary for the value provided. In contrast, other brands like Cisco, Aruba, EnGenius, and Ruckus have maintained subscription-free models since the 802.11n era or earlier. The market is crowded with options.
A
Aldrin10
09-23-2021, 07:18 AM #6

I estimate the 5-year licensing expense as part of the total cost of ownership. If a system lacks an annual charge, it’s fine; otherwise, it should be included when determining the purchase price. This applies to dedicated controllers too—they simply add up to the overall budget. When evaluating total costs, these figures must be accounted for. Another aspect often overlooked is the switching equipment and power supplies, typically using a PoE switch for both. From a quality standpoint, consider aspects like radio filtering and range in challenging environments. For comparable performance to their $200 WAPs, I can opt for a $100 WAP from Cisco that offers controller-like management, including clustering. Alternatively, investing $250–$300 over five years could provide superior hardware and enhanced management capabilities. For many users, Ubiquiti works adequately, but they often charge more than necessary for the value provided. In contrast, other brands like Cisco, Aruba, EnGenius, and Ruckus have maintained subscription-free models since the 802.11n era or earlier. The market is crowded with options.