F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Experiencing stutters at 144hz

Experiencing stutters at 144hz

Experiencing stutters at 144hz

L
Llabros
Senior Member
740
08-16-2017, 01:55 PM
#1
Hi,
I'm checking if running at 144hz in CSGO and League is normal, and I'm also thinking about upgrades for my monitor. Right now I have:
OS: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 1600
RAM: 16GB Dual-Channel @ 1463MHz
Graphics: G2460 at 144Hz
I'm considering a 240hz monitor and want to know what upgrades would be beneficial.
L
Llabros
08-16-2017, 01:55 PM #1

Hi,
I'm checking if running at 144hz in CSGO and League is normal, and I'm also thinking about upgrades for my monitor. Right now I have:
OS: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 1600
RAM: 16GB Dual-Channel @ 1463MHz
Graphics: G2460 at 144Hz
I'm considering a 240hz monitor and want to know what upgrades would be beneficial.

T
Theundead28
Junior Member
16
08-30-2017, 01:05 PM
#2
It depends on how you interpret stutters.
On my Ryzen 1700 + RX 580 setup, I tested CS:GO and noticed an average of 170fps, with 96fps at 1% and 74fps at 0.1%. This could be perceived as stutters.
At 4K resolution, performance was likely similar to 1080p because the GPU wasn’t fully utilized, even with a newer model.
You might want to check CPU and GPU usage during testing to identify what’s causing the issue.
T
Theundead28
08-30-2017, 01:05 PM #2

It depends on how you interpret stutters.
On my Ryzen 1700 + RX 580 setup, I tested CS:GO and noticed an average of 170fps, with 96fps at 1% and 74fps at 0.1%. This could be perceived as stutters.
At 4K resolution, performance was likely similar to 1080p because the GPU wasn’t fully utilized, even with a newer model.
You might want to check CPU and GPU usage during testing to identify what’s causing the issue.

W
Waverabbit
Senior Member
643
08-30-2017, 09:06 PM
#3
Use Riva Tuner to cap the frame rate at 144Hz, which could help smooth out the frame times.
W
Waverabbit
08-30-2017, 09:06 PM #3

Use Riva Tuner to cap the frame rate at 144Hz, which could help smooth out the frame times.

W
War_Car
Member
104
08-30-2017, 11:08 PM
#4
Riva performs exceptionally in improving frame-time pacing, though the input latency issue remains quite significant when compared to a properly set system, unfortunately. Pre-installed FPS caps for any game, or GPU driver-based FPS limits such as Radeon Chill or FPS Target, are much better at avoiding extra input lag (for example, 3ms with driver-based solutions versus 20-30ms with Riva in CSGO, which often means doubling the input delay).

It’s possible that achieving a functional minimum and average performance is what I’m aiming for. My assumption is your 1600x might be limiting the overall setup, possibly due to too many background tasks—something that usually affects even small percentages of performance. It could also stem from background processes that aren’t hardware-related but are the biggest factor in low frame rates.

If background activity isn’t a problem and you have enough thermal capacity, consider a slight CPU overclock. Also, keep an eye on your specs; they’re likely still adequate.

Regarding pricing, it hasn’t been released yet, but it should appear soon. If OLED panels at 120hz or 144hz for 1080p become available at similar prices to 240hz models, they’ll probably offer better performance and responsiveness in fast-paced games. In such cases, response time, clarity, and lack of motion blur matter more than the refresh rate.

Check real reviews from sites like Techspot or Display Ninja before purchasing. The claimed "1ms response time" is often misleading—they focus on ideal conditions and rarely mention ghosting issues. What truly matters is how quickly the monitor reacts without ghosting.

In summary, a 144hz monitor might outperform higher refresh rate models if the lag remains low. Most TN 240hz monitors are solid, except for some unusual exceptions. Aim for a model with genuine response times and minimal ghosting to truly enhance gaming experience.
W
War_Car
08-30-2017, 11:08 PM #4

Riva performs exceptionally in improving frame-time pacing, though the input latency issue remains quite significant when compared to a properly set system, unfortunately. Pre-installed FPS caps for any game, or GPU driver-based FPS limits such as Radeon Chill or FPS Target, are much better at avoiding extra input lag (for example, 3ms with driver-based solutions versus 20-30ms with Riva in CSGO, which often means doubling the input delay).

It’s possible that achieving a functional minimum and average performance is what I’m aiming for. My assumption is your 1600x might be limiting the overall setup, possibly due to too many background tasks—something that usually affects even small percentages of performance. It could also stem from background processes that aren’t hardware-related but are the biggest factor in low frame rates.

If background activity isn’t a problem and you have enough thermal capacity, consider a slight CPU overclock. Also, keep an eye on your specs; they’re likely still adequate.

Regarding pricing, it hasn’t been released yet, but it should appear soon. If OLED panels at 120hz or 144hz for 1080p become available at similar prices to 240hz models, they’ll probably offer better performance and responsiveness in fast-paced games. In such cases, response time, clarity, and lack of motion blur matter more than the refresh rate.

Check real reviews from sites like Techspot or Display Ninja before purchasing. The claimed "1ms response time" is often misleading—they focus on ideal conditions and rarely mention ghosting issues. What truly matters is how quickly the monitor reacts without ghosting.

In summary, a 144hz monitor might outperform higher refresh rate models if the lag remains low. Most TN 240hz monitors are solid, except for some unusual exceptions. Aim for a model with genuine response times and minimal ghosting to truly enhance gaming experience.

S
SolitudeFX
Member
131
09-01-2017, 07:30 AM
#5
Your cooling might not be sufficient for your CPU, or you might need to use VSync to cap your frame rate at 144
S
SolitudeFX
09-01-2017, 07:30 AM #5

Your cooling might not be sufficient for your CPU, or you might need to use VSync to cap your frame rate at 144