F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Expanding Connectivity to Additional Structures

Expanding Connectivity to Additional Structures

Expanding Connectivity to Additional Structures

M
MCgamer_John
Junior Member
9
07-08-2016, 04:07 AM
#1
I’m exploring ways to connect your home to the internet while sharing the same bill. You can run cables from the pole or router to the back of your building, but visibility is limited by trees and the 200-foot distance. You’re considering MoCA or Ethernet as potential solutions.
M
MCgamer_John
07-08-2016, 04:07 AM #1

I’m exploring ways to connect your home to the internet while sharing the same bill. You can run cables from the pole or router to the back of your building, but visibility is limited by trees and the 200-foot distance. You’re considering MoCA or Ethernet as potential solutions.

S
SinisterGTL
Junior Member
14
07-09-2016, 05:44 AM
#2
What connection speeds are you aiming for inside the home? And what bandwidth are you experiencing on the primary property where the internet is currently available?
S
SinisterGTL
07-09-2016, 05:44 AM #2

What connection speeds are you aiming for inside the home? And what bandwidth are you experiencing on the primary property where the internet is currently available?

N
nahte5
Member
206
07-29-2016, 09:22 AM
#3
I’d install underground Ethernet, gather a shovel and carve a route linking the two structures. Then lay flexible, waterproof tubing inside, using a shielded cable for protection, and finally cap both ends securely. That’s the plan I’d follow.
N
nahte5
07-29-2016, 09:22 AM #3

I’d install underground Ethernet, gather a shovel and carve a route linking the two structures. Then lay flexible, waterproof tubing inside, using a shielded cable for protection, and finally cap both ends securely. That’s the plan I’d follow.

B
BooyaLuver19
Member
77
07-29-2016, 03:23 PM
#4
I currently handle 200 Mbps downloads and 40 Mbps uploads. Thanks to Comcast, I receive roughly half of that. I aim for faster speeds and act as the main internet user.
B
BooyaLuver19
07-29-2016, 03:23 PM #4

I currently handle 200 Mbps downloads and 40 Mbps uploads. Thanks to Comcast, I receive roughly half of that. I aim for faster speeds and act as the main internet user.

T
ThomasB_
Junior Member
13
08-04-2016, 06:06 AM
#5
You might need a longer Ethernet cable, as 200 feet is quite extended for standard Ethernet. The presence of nearby ground power could also affect the signal quality.
T
ThomasB_
08-04-2016, 06:06 AM #5

You might need a longer Ethernet cable, as 200 feet is quite extended for standard Ethernet. The presence of nearby ground power could also affect the signal quality.

S
soccerman12354
Junior Member
16
08-04-2016, 07:08 AM
#6
Ethernet functions properly over distances up to 100 meters. For concerns about interference or other problems, use burial-grade fiber; otherwise, standard burial-grade Cat5e or Cat6 cables should suffice.
S
soccerman12354
08-04-2016, 07:08 AM #6

Ethernet functions properly over distances up to 100 meters. For concerns about interference or other problems, use burial-grade fiber; otherwise, standard burial-grade Cat5e or Cat6 cables should suffice.

F
FanEnsemble
Member
237
08-04-2016, 03:56 PM
#7
I consider 48V PoE combined with Cat.6 cabling. Shielded cables are recommended to handle interference issues and for underground installation. The wiring needs to be robust—thick and include a flexible solid core inside.
F
FanEnsemble
08-04-2016, 03:56 PM #7

I consider 48V PoE combined with Cat.6 cabling. Shielded cables are recommended to handle interference issues and for underground installation. The wiring needs to be robust—thick and include a flexible solid core inside.

P
P0lrbear
Junior Member
2
08-07-2016, 06:46 PM
#8
Ignore the advice from others here. Avoid using standard Ethernet cables. Building-to-building cabling shouldn't use copper because the ground in each building differs, causing unwanted current flow on the cable! This is problematic. Use a trenching tool, install optical fiber between buildings, and employ a media converter or switch with SFP ports.
P
P0lrbear
08-07-2016, 06:46 PM #8

Ignore the advice from others here. Avoid using standard Ethernet cables. Building-to-building cabling shouldn't use copper because the ground in each building differs, causing unwanted current flow on the cable! This is problematic. Use a trenching tool, install optical fiber between buildings, and employ a media converter or switch with SFP ports.

D
DiegoMyDog
Junior Member
34
08-08-2016, 03:14 AM
#9
I overlooked uncommon reasons. Problems occur in audio systems. Fiber should support running it close to power.
D
DiegoMyDog
08-08-2016, 03:14 AM #9

I overlooked uncommon reasons. Problems occur in audio systems. Fiber should support running it close to power.

S
SLOgamingLP
Member
220
08-09-2016, 12:26 PM
#10
You mention several key points about electrical systems. The main issue is handling copper runs between buildings during lightning strikes, which often causes failures. Grounding through equipment is another factor. Power over Ethernet can deliver large power outputs—thousands of watts. If ground potential becomes excessively high, it may damage components before the cable itself. I haven’t seen your reasoning before, but fiber optics seem to be the preferred choice now.
S
SLOgamingLP
08-09-2016, 12:26 PM #10

You mention several key points about electrical systems. The main issue is handling copper runs between buildings during lightning strikes, which often causes failures. Grounding through equipment is another factor. Power over Ethernet can deliver large power outputs—thousands of watts. If ground potential becomes excessively high, it may damage components before the cable itself. I haven’t seen your reasoning before, but fiber optics seem to be the preferred choice now.