F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Executing CPU overclocking without any active tasks.

Executing CPU overclocking without any active tasks.

Executing CPU overclocking without any active tasks.

N
Ngiam_x
Junior Member
47
02-04-2019, 06:49 PM
#1
Hey! It looks like you're in good shape with your R5 3600. Running at 4.3GHz at 1.17v seems stable, and the temperatures are nicely controlled—never exceeding 73°C, except briefly during intense games. The idle temps hover around 44°C. This setup seems to prevent the power and heat spikes you experienced with the Ryzen 3000. Also, keeping the voltage, frequency, and temps in check reduced power draw significantly when stressing the CPU.
N
Ngiam_x
02-04-2019, 06:49 PM #1

Hey! It looks like you're in good shape with your R5 3600. Running at 4.3GHz at 1.17v seems stable, and the temperatures are nicely controlled—never exceeding 73°C, except briefly during intense games. The idle temps hover around 44°C. This setup seems to prevent the power and heat spikes you experienced with the Ryzen 3000. Also, keeping the voltage, frequency, and temps in check reduced power draw significantly when stressing the CPU.

J
JGbb
Member
163
02-06-2019, 05:08 PM
#2
It’s functioning properly as expected. This setup enhances a single core to its peak performance, allowing tasks to complete faster while conserving energy. The overclock operates at a lower voltage than the maximum setting, which means it uses less power under full load compared to the 4.3GHz all-core auto boost. You’re getting a solid CPU capable of this behavior, though results aren’t guaranteed. Power consumption remains lower during heavy use but rises more noticeably when idle. Since the processor maintains high clock speeds, longevity isn’t an issue—your system should last well beyond its current usefulness.
J
JGbb
02-06-2019, 05:08 PM #2

It’s functioning properly as expected. This setup enhances a single core to its peak performance, allowing tasks to complete faster while conserving energy. The overclock operates at a lower voltage than the maximum setting, which means it uses less power under full load compared to the 4.3GHz all-core auto boost. You’re getting a solid CPU capable of this behavior, though results aren’t guaranteed. Power consumption remains lower during heavy use but rises more noticeably when idle. Since the processor maintains high clock speeds, longevity isn’t an issue—your system should last well beyond its current usefulness.

W
Wixxgriffel
Member
191
02-14-2019, 08:39 AM
#3
Yes, it should work. The CPU can stay at 4.3GHz when idle as long as temperatures and voltage match the specifications.
W
Wixxgriffel
02-14-2019, 08:39 AM #3

Yes, it should work. The CPU can stay at 4.3GHz when idle as long as temperatures and voltage match the specifications.

W
Waxo1993
Member
56
02-14-2019, 10:25 AM
#4
No issues expected with your CPU.
W
Waxo1993
02-14-2019, 10:25 AM #4

No issues expected with your CPU.

X
XxBlobvisxX
Junior Member
36
02-14-2019, 10:44 AM
#5
highlight the need for stable performance by using minimal FFT operations in prime95. keep in mind an undervolt and low voltage since it looks like you're running above the standard boost frequency but at lower voltages. You might have a capable processor, so if you require more speed later, there should be enough headroom on that chip. Avoid being too cautious with voltage because that can affect efficiency. This setup seems aimed at performance optimization (up to 1.45V), while efficiency-focused setups want maximum speed at the lowest possible voltage—just below the point where gains slow down. It appears your CPU is already near this optimal range, though you could potentially improve slightly without sacrificing efficiency.
X
XxBlobvisxX
02-14-2019, 10:44 AM #5

highlight the need for stable performance by using minimal FFT operations in prime95. keep in mind an undervolt and low voltage since it looks like you're running above the standard boost frequency but at lower voltages. You might have a capable processor, so if you require more speed later, there should be enough headroom on that chip. Avoid being too cautious with voltage because that can affect efficiency. This setup seems aimed at performance optimization (up to 1.45V), while efficiency-focused setups want maximum speed at the lowest possible voltage—just below the point where gains slow down. It appears your CPU is already near this optimal range, though you could potentially improve slightly without sacrificing efficiency.