F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Exchange information across distinct network segments.

Exchange information across distinct network segments.

Exchange information across distinct network segments.

T
tannermc567
Junior Member
14
06-07-2016, 10:11 PM
#1
I just swapped my Apple Airport Extreme for a Wavelink Quantum DAX/WL-WN538A8 AC3200 router. It features three Gigabit LAN ports and one WAN port linked to my old router at 192.168.0.1 with DHCP. The Wavlink unit (192.168.10.1) has a Windows 10 PC and two printers on the LAN, getting IPs through DHCP. Both LAN and WAN ports need separate IP ranges—this wasn’t a problem before. Issue: I can ping from 192.168.10.x to 192.168.0.x but not vice versa. What should I do?
T
tannermc567
06-07-2016, 10:11 PM #1

I just swapped my Apple Airport Extreme for a Wavelink Quantum DAX/WL-WN538A8 AC3200 router. It features three Gigabit LAN ports and one WAN port linked to my old router at 192.168.0.1 with DHCP. The Wavlink unit (192.168.10.1) has a Windows 10 PC and two printers on the LAN, getting IPs through DHCP. Both LAN and WAN ports need separate IP ranges—this wasn’t a problem before. Issue: I can ping from 192.168.10.x to 192.168.0.x but not vice versa. What should I do?

C
Canadian_Reed
Junior Member
14
06-24-2016, 07:13 AM
#2
A more effective approach would be to disable DHCP on your second router and connect via LAN instead of WAN to the first router. This ensures the first router manages all DHCP requests and maintains a consistent network range.
C
Canadian_Reed
06-24-2016, 07:13 AM #2

A more effective approach would be to disable DHCP on your second router and connect via LAN instead of WAN to the first router. This ensures the first router manages all DHCP requests and maintains a consistent network range.

P
PhantasiaOG
Junior Member
30
06-24-2016, 08:12 AM
#3
In short, turn the second router into an access point
P
PhantasiaOG
06-24-2016, 08:12 AM #3

In short, turn the second router into an access point

M
MrJoris02
Member
195
06-24-2016, 09:41 AM
#4
Turn off the nat on the second router or disable DHCP. It should function properly as an access point!
M
MrJoris02
06-24-2016, 09:41 AM #4

Turn off the nat on the second router or disable DHCP. It should function properly as an access point!

D
Darkbandit92
Posting Freak
839
06-25-2016, 11:58 PM
#5
The traffic direction depends on the router handling the connection. It directs data between networks, but when you're connected to a device like 192.168.10.5, it doesn't recognize it as part of its own network. It forwards the request to the default gateway (192.168.10.1). If the other router is involved, it can route the message correctly because it has the appropriate address range. On the other hand, if you're on 192.168.0.5 and ping 192.168.10.5, the same issue arises—it sends the request to its default gateway (192.168.0.1), which isn't part of the 192.168.10.x network and can't deliver it. The simpler fix is to disable DHCP on the second router so it acts as a static access point instead of relying on NAT. Alternatively, you could manually add a custom route to forward traffic for the 192.168.10.x subnet to the other router's IP within its network.
D
Darkbandit92
06-25-2016, 11:58 PM #5

The traffic direction depends on the router handling the connection. It directs data between networks, but when you're connected to a device like 192.168.10.5, it doesn't recognize it as part of its own network. It forwards the request to the default gateway (192.168.10.1). If the other router is involved, it can route the message correctly because it has the appropriate address range. On the other hand, if you're on 192.168.0.5 and ping 192.168.10.5, the same issue arises—it sends the request to its default gateway (192.168.0.1), which isn't part of the 192.168.10.x network and can't deliver it. The simpler fix is to disable DHCP on the second router so it acts as a static access point instead of relying on NAT. Alternatively, you could manually add a custom route to forward traffic for the 192.168.10.x subnet to the other router's IP within its network.

C
CyberPhoenix
Member
167
06-26-2016, 01:01 AM
#6
You'd need two DHCP servers, and it can be frustrating on a simple network.
C
CyberPhoenix
06-26-2016, 01:01 AM #6

You'd need two DHCP servers, and it can be frustrating on a simple network.

K
Kynedee
Posting Freak
784
06-26-2016, 05:41 AM
#7
Usually turning off the nat feature on a router also shuts down the DHCP server.
K
Kynedee
06-26-2016, 05:41 AM #7

Usually turning off the nat feature on a router also shuts down the DHCP server.

O
ofeliant
Member
174
06-26-2016, 06:07 AM
#8
Make sure you're certain about that, right?
O
ofeliant
06-26-2016, 06:07 AM #8

Make sure you're certain about that, right?