F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Energy-saving gaming processor available in 2020

Energy-saving gaming processor available in 2020

Energy-saving gaming processor available in 2020

S
Seve_PT
Member
229
09-19-2023, 01:22 AM
#1
This question is quite challenging as there isn't a clear conclusion yet. Understanding the topic requires more insight. Having this information would greatly enhance our knowledge. 7nm AMD is likely to perform better than older 12nm or 14nm chips, although AMD has limited auto-overclocking features with PBO to manage CPU power based on thermal conditions. Performance has traditionally been a key priority in the desktop market. Intel is now boosting power delivery to create faster processors, as achieving efficiency at 14nm isn't possible. A positive aspect is Intel's recent experiments in optimizing power usage, likely due to the significant gap between base and boost clocks. Unlike AMD, Intel can achieve better efficiency even with 7nm CPUs. For laptops, Intel has focused on 14nm++ designs for scientific work rather than competing directly with AMD. Despite AMD's lower prices and marketing, Intel appears to be the future. It's difficult to say which architecture is more power-efficient for gaming specifically—7nm AMD or 14nm Intel—since power consumption isn't a priority. Without comprehensive data comparing all Intel and AMD CPUs using gaming benchmarks, it's hard to draw definitive conclusions. What are your thoughts? I'd love to hear your perspective and discuss this further.
S
Seve_PT
09-19-2023, 01:22 AM #1

This question is quite challenging as there isn't a clear conclusion yet. Understanding the topic requires more insight. Having this information would greatly enhance our knowledge. 7nm AMD is likely to perform better than older 12nm or 14nm chips, although AMD has limited auto-overclocking features with PBO to manage CPU power based on thermal conditions. Performance has traditionally been a key priority in the desktop market. Intel is now boosting power delivery to create faster processors, as achieving efficiency at 14nm isn't possible. A positive aspect is Intel's recent experiments in optimizing power usage, likely due to the significant gap between base and boost clocks. Unlike AMD, Intel can achieve better efficiency even with 7nm CPUs. For laptops, Intel has focused on 14nm++ designs for scientific work rather than competing directly with AMD. Despite AMD's lower prices and marketing, Intel appears to be the future. It's difficult to say which architecture is more power-efficient for gaming specifically—7nm AMD or 14nm Intel—since power consumption isn't a priority. Without comprehensive data comparing all Intel and AMD CPUs using gaming benchmarks, it's hard to draw definitive conclusions. What are your thoughts? I'd love to hear your perspective and discuss this further.

G
GamenMetLeviNL
Senior Member
638
09-19-2023, 02:45 AM
#2
ok
G
GamenMetLeviNL
09-19-2023, 02:45 AM #2

ok

P
PonezHD
Junior Member
4
09-26-2023, 05:37 AM
#3
A solid written CPU analysis will reveal its power usage during idle, single-core and multi-core operations. Usually, they assess consumption through benchmarks. https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/am...iew,7.html
P
PonezHD
09-26-2023, 05:37 AM #3

A solid written CPU analysis will reveal its power usage during idle, single-core and multi-core operations. Usually, they assess consumption through benchmarks. https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/am...iew,7.html

N
Nerdben
Member
112
09-30-2023, 03:13 AM
#4
In terms of TDP, the 3700x stands out significantly. It offers 8 cores and 16 threads with a TDP of 65. In comparison, Intel's upcoming 6 and 8 core processors are reported to have a TDP of 125.
N
Nerdben
09-30-2023, 03:13 AM #4

In terms of TDP, the 3700x stands out significantly. It offers 8 cores and 16 threads with a TDP of 65. In comparison, Intel's upcoming 6 and 8 core processors are reported to have a TDP of 125.