F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Driver issues with graphics software.

Driver issues with graphics software.

Driver issues with graphics software.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
M
mineuout482
Posting Freak
812
10-02-2016, 03:49 PM
#11
I said I prefer Xorg because it's much lighter. I'm not too concerned about it becoming deprecated as long as it keeps running smoothly. Everything looks the same, and I haven't noticed any issues.
M
mineuout482
10-02-2016, 03:49 PM #11

I said I prefer Xorg because it's much lighter. I'm not too concerned about it becoming deprecated as long as it keeps running smoothly. Everything looks the same, and I haven't noticed any issues.

K
kingpin73
Member
80
10-02-2016, 07:45 PM
#12
The information indicates that modesetting is active while fbdev and vesa are not. Even though the Xorg driver is present—likely for backup or bundled with Xorg—I believe it continues to rely on the modesetting driver under both X11 and Wayland environments.
K
kingpin73
10-02-2016, 07:45 PM #12

The information indicates that modesetting is active while fbdev and vesa are not. Even though the Xorg driver is present—likely for backup or bundled with Xorg—I believe it continues to rely on the modesetting driver under both X11 and Wayland environments.

1
1234qaz12qaz
Posting Freak
773
10-03-2016, 04:07 AM
#13
It depends on your preference; Linux thrives on options. If hardware acceleration isn't functioning, the best resources are the Arch and Gentoo wikis, as they require explicit instructions. They're also useful since they clarify your GPU's capabilities with respect to codecs.
1
1234qaz12qaz
10-03-2016, 04:07 AM #13

It depends on your preference; Linux thrives on options. If hardware acceleration isn't functioning, the best resources are the Arch and Gentoo wikis, as they require explicit instructions. They're also useful since they clarify your GPU's capabilities with respect to codecs.

O
Osi2
Member
56
10-07-2016, 03:59 AM
#14
Hardware acceleration appears to be active. The steps taken seem to increase CPU load when using the GUI, which suggests it might have been enabled by default or through a different method. I didn't install the driver referenced, only applied Chrome flags. Monitoring via intel_gpu_top and decoding confirms functionality. It's unclear if the issue was due to acceleration or GUI interaction.
O
Osi2
10-07-2016, 03:59 AM #14

Hardware acceleration appears to be active. The steps taken seem to increase CPU load when using the GUI, which suggests it might have been enabled by default or through a different method. I didn't install the driver referenced, only applied Chrome flags. Monitoring via intel_gpu_top and decoding confirms functionality. It's unclear if the issue was due to acceleration or GUI interaction.

C
crachh
Junior Member
23
10-07-2016, 05:47 AM
#15
I meant clicking on things or moving the mouse pointer, not something else.
C
crachh
10-07-2016, 05:47 AM #15

I meant clicking on things or moving the mouse pointer, not something else.

I
iruleyoudont1
Junior Member
3
10-07-2016, 06:38 AM
#16
Moving the mouse while the GUI appears increases the CPU load.
I
iruleyoudont1
10-07-2016, 06:38 AM #16

Moving the mouse while the GUI appears increases the CPU load.

I
invisibleboy_
Junior Member
15
10-07-2016, 01:25 PM
#17
Sufficient to cause interference, or merely a clear rise?
I
invisibleboy_
10-07-2016, 01:25 PM #17

Sufficient to cause interference, or merely a clear rise?

E
140
10-09-2016, 02:36 AM
#18
noticeable
E
Egyptian_Gamer
10-09-2016, 02:36 AM #18

noticeable

C
cali_
Junior Member
19
10-16-2016, 10:57 AM
#19
It's understandable given the situation.
C
cali_
10-16-2016, 10:57 AM #19

It's understandable given the situation.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2