F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Download the installation file for your Mac.

Download the installation file for your Mac.

Download the installation file for your Mac.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3
K
KerrBear2002
Member
53
04-05-2016, 02:34 AM
#21
Protection comes in many forms, sure DRM is widely used, but another approach could be a cease-and-desist or legal action. I’m fairly certain that if someone tried to share that data, GoG would likely take steps like a copyright strike or a cease-and-desist, and if needed, a lawsuit.
K
KerrBear2002
04-05-2016, 02:34 AM #21

Protection comes in many forms, sure DRM is widely used, but another approach could be a cease-and-desist or legal action. I’m fairly certain that if someone tried to share that data, GoG would likely take steps like a copyright strike or a cease-and-desist, and if needed, a lawsuit.

G
GGlobato
Member
176
04-11-2016, 09:48 PM
#22
Software that is paid should be acknowledged with appreciation, but free software needs to protect itself using built-in controls. This seems a bit confusing... I’m not sure that’s accurate. Is it really free? You can’t simply purchase it independently, can you? It’s bundled with a product and while they don’t charge extra for it, you might see that as an investment. If it were genuinely free, they’d offer downloads directly on their site, but they don’t. You have to obtain it via the App Store, which itself represents a level of distribution control.
G
GGlobato
04-11-2016, 09:48 PM #22

Software that is paid should be acknowledged with appreciation, but free software needs to protect itself using built-in controls. This seems a bit confusing... I’m not sure that’s accurate. Is it really free? You can’t simply purchase it independently, can you? It’s bundled with a product and while they don’t charge extra for it, you might see that as an investment. If it were genuinely free, they’d offer downloads directly on their site, but they don’t. You have to obtain it via the App Store, which itself represents a level of distribution control.

I
infring
Junior Member
13
04-11-2016, 11:05 PM
#23
If there was a reason to do it, the only reason a firm would spend resources blocking people from using software is when the cost of not acting becomes clear.
I
infring
04-11-2016, 11:05 PM #23

If there was a reason to do it, the only reason a firm would spend resources blocking people from using software is when the cost of not acting becomes clear.

T
Thea77661
Member
58
04-19-2016, 04:24 AM
#24
Without a defined license cost on macOS, I aim for a legal argument that purchasing a Mac grants you access to Apple’s software license. The phrasing should suggest you receive permission to use macOS when buying the device. Since there’s no concrete pricing, it prevents any investment or purchase from being made without clear terms.
T
Thea77661
04-19-2016, 04:24 AM #24

Without a defined license cost on macOS, I aim for a legal argument that purchasing a Mac grants you access to Apple’s software license. The phrasing should suggest you receive permission to use macOS when buying the device. Since there’s no concrete pricing, it prevents any investment or purchase from being made without clear terms.

A
aquadio
Member
138
04-27-2016, 02:42 AM
#25
This is the first case so far that I'm aware of this question/topic coming up since our rule change. Prior to the change being made public, the final internal decision was that we would allow people to talk about and help with making a hackintosh, but that the OS must be legit - we would not point people to where to download it if they did not have a Mac, etc. This was based on reasoning at the time and not made randomly, but clearly there is quite a bit of disagreement. Frankly I feel unable to move forward with any action at this time so I'm going to await a clear decision from higher up. Whatever that is will be final and will set a precedent for all future cases.
A
aquadio
04-27-2016, 02:42 AM #25

This is the first case so far that I'm aware of this question/topic coming up since our rule change. Prior to the change being made public, the final internal decision was that we would allow people to talk about and help with making a hackintosh, but that the OS must be legit - we would not point people to where to download it if they did not have a Mac, etc. This was based on reasoning at the time and not made randomly, but clearly there is quite a bit of disagreement. Frankly I feel unable to move forward with any action at this time so I'm going to await a clear decision from higher up. Whatever that is will be final and will set a precedent for all future cases.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3