F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Does XMP lead to increased core temperatures?

Does XMP lead to increased core temperatures?

Does XMP lead to increased core temperatures?

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
B
barleby76
Member
145
07-22-2017, 09:27 PM
#1
Hi,
I just achieved a stable overclock on my i7 7700k at 4.9GHz with 1.32v using default RAM settings. The next adjustment was to turn on XMP, which increased core temperatures by 5-15°C. I’m wondering what might be causing this and how to fix it. Should I manually configure my RAM or keep XMP active while lowering VCCIO and System agent voltage? My temperatures without XMP are around 75-80 during stress tests, but jump to 85-95 when XMP is enabled.
B
barleby76
07-22-2017, 09:27 PM #1

Hi,
I just achieved a stable overclock on my i7 7700k at 4.9GHz with 1.32v using default RAM settings. The next adjustment was to turn on XMP, which increased core temperatures by 5-15°C. I’m wondering what might be causing this and how to fix it. Should I manually configure my RAM or keep XMP active while lowering VCCIO and System agent voltage? My temperatures without XMP are around 75-80 during stress tests, but jump to 85-95 when XMP is enabled.

A
Acew25
Member
51
07-23-2017, 04:33 AM
#2
I finally resolved the issue after many attempts. I reset the BIOS to default optimized settings (not CMOS clear). Then I manually adjusted my CPU. Everything worked smoothly. Next, I experimented with my RAM, beginning at its recommended overclocked speed but reducing the MHz as temperatures rose. Gradually increasing the RAM speed caused higher temps until I relaxed the timings, which stabilized the temperature. Eventually, I matched the XMP frequency the manufacturer set. It all required careful manual adjustments.
A
Acew25
07-23-2017, 04:33 AM #2

I finally resolved the issue after many attempts. I reset the BIOS to default optimized settings (not CMOS clear). Then I manually adjusted my CPU. Everything worked smoothly. Next, I experimented with my RAM, beginning at its recommended overclocked speed but reducing the MHz as temperatures rose. Gradually increasing the RAM speed caused higher temps until I relaxed the timings, which stabilized the temperature. Eventually, I matched the XMP frequency the manufacturer set. It all required careful manual adjustments.

C
caseyjones223
Junior Member
18
07-30-2017, 01:02 AM
#3
The memory controller is located inside the CPU. Increasing its workload generates more heat. You have two options: reduce its speed or lower the CPU's performance slightly. There is no quick solution.
C
caseyjones223
07-30-2017, 01:02 AM #3

The memory controller is located inside the CPU. Increasing its workload generates more heat. You have two options: reduce its speed or lower the CPU's performance slightly. There is no quick solution.

J
JebThePleb
Posting Freak
898
07-30-2017, 01:48 PM
#4
What action should I begin with?
J
JebThePleb
07-30-2017, 01:48 PM #4

What action should I begin with?

M
Malktheas
Junior Member
2
08-03-2017, 08:54 AM
#5
Consider starting by configuring XMP, then fine-tuning the CPU overclock until you feel satisfied with the temperatures.
M
Malktheas
08-03-2017, 08:54 AM #5

Consider starting by configuring XMP, then fine-tuning the CPU overclock until you feel satisfied with the temperatures.

J
Jotta
Member
61
08-03-2017, 09:25 AM
#6
Have you confirmed your CPU's frequency after using XMP? Sometimes enabling XMP can boost BCLK along with memory multiplier, leading to higher CPU speeds and potentially increased temperatures.
J
Jotta
08-03-2017, 09:25 AM #6

Have you confirmed your CPU's frequency after using XMP? Sometimes enabling XMP can boost BCLK along with memory multiplier, leading to higher CPU speeds and potentially increased temperatures.

S
Silberflug
Member
203
08-03-2017, 10:18 AM
#7
Yes, the frequency remains consistent and it configured bclk to 100
S
Silberflug
08-03-2017, 10:18 AM #7

Yes, the frequency remains consistent and it configured bclk to 100

D
DantehIsGay
Posting Freak
902
08-04-2017, 01:36 PM
#8
I attempted to lower viccio and system agent to 1.0 but still faced high temperatures. I'll explore further adjustments and provide an update.
D
DantehIsGay
08-04-2017, 01:36 PM #8

I attempted to lower viccio and system agent to 1.0 but still faced high temperatures. I'll explore further adjustments and provide an update.

D
203
08-04-2017, 02:16 PM
#9
After adjusting many parameters, the only thing that worked was switching the DRAM voltage from the XMP value of 1.35 to auto and lowering the memory clock from its XMP rating of 3200 to about 2500mhz. This change feels quite significant. Was this approach previously discussed or am I overlooking something? Additionally, should I prioritize lowering my CPU speed from 4.9 GHz to maintain stable temperatures with a higher memory clock, or would keeping the memory downclocked be more beneficial for performance?
D
demenciossauro
08-04-2017, 02:16 PM #9

After adjusting many parameters, the only thing that worked was switching the DRAM voltage from the XMP value of 1.35 to auto and lowering the memory clock from its XMP rating of 3200 to about 2500mhz. This change feels quite significant. Was this approach previously discussed or am I overlooking something? Additionally, should I prioritize lowering my CPU speed from 4.9 GHz to maintain stable temperatures with a higher memory clock, or would keeping the memory downclocked be more beneficial for performance?

G
GoneSalam
Junior Member
5
08-09-2017, 05:50 AM
#10
It varies by use, but generally 90% or higher of the time the CPU outperforms the memory.
G
GoneSalam
08-09-2017, 05:50 AM #10

It varies by use, but generally 90% or higher of the time the CPU outperforms the memory.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next