F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Discussing the configuration of mesh network systems

Discussing the configuration of mesh network systems

Discussing the configuration of mesh network systems

S
Skeetarr
Member
146
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM
#1
I have a modest wired network powered by AT&T Gig internet. Everything on the wired side operates smoothly—my concern lies with the Wi-Fi configuration. Right now, my AT&T device (BGW320) works only as a router with wireless disabled. I own a Netgear RAX200 router, which is a strong access point, and I’ve placed it centrally in the house, operating in bridge mode. On both ends of the long home, I connect smaller APs that draw power from the wired network. This setup creates three separate Wi-Fi networks. While speeds are usually good, switching between them can be frustrating, especially when moving around; the original network’s signal is strong enough to keep devices connected, forcing me to manually hop to the nearest AP. I recently purchased a mesh system (MK83) thinking it would help, but I’m uncertain if it will function correctly without the main router also acting as a hub. I’m wondering if the mesh can operate with the BGW320 still serving as the central router via bridge mode, and if the two satellites could replace the smaller APs at each end while using Ethernet for better performance.
S
Skeetarr
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM #1

I have a modest wired network powered by AT&T Gig internet. Everything on the wired side operates smoothly—my concern lies with the Wi-Fi configuration. Right now, my AT&T device (BGW320) works only as a router with wireless disabled. I own a Netgear RAX200 router, which is a strong access point, and I’ve placed it centrally in the house, operating in bridge mode. On both ends of the long home, I connect smaller APs that draw power from the wired network. This setup creates three separate Wi-Fi networks. While speeds are usually good, switching between them can be frustrating, especially when moving around; the original network’s signal is strong enough to keep devices connected, forcing me to manually hop to the nearest AP. I recently purchased a mesh system (MK83) thinking it would help, but I’m uncertain if it will function correctly without the main router also acting as a hub. I’m wondering if the mesh can operate with the BGW320 still serving as the central router via bridge mode, and if the two satellites could replace the smaller APs at each end while using Ethernet for better performance.

D
Dovi007
Member
78
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM
#2
Find SMB support for high-speed DSL on Att's website.
D
Dovi007
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM #2

Find SMB support for high-speed DSL on Att's website.

J
JuniorMunemo99
Junior Member
33
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM
#3
You aim to switch the ATT box into bridge or passthrough configuration. This reduces it to a simple modem with no firewall—keep this in mind. A firewall remains essential between your devices and the internet; always remember this. For future safety, avoid using it without a router connecting your devices and the ATT box after this step, or revert to the default setting first. Once that’s done, you can connect any router you prefer behind it. Skipping this step may lead to double NAT, which isn’t ideal but not impossible. Ideally, have fiber connected directly to the ATT ONT (the unit provided) in bridge mode, then link your router. If possible, use an Ethernet backhaul for better performance; wireless mesh works well too.
J
JuniorMunemo99
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM #3

You aim to switch the ATT box into bridge or passthrough configuration. This reduces it to a simple modem with no firewall—keep this in mind. A firewall remains essential between your devices and the internet; always remember this. For future safety, avoid using it without a router connecting your devices and the ATT box after this step, or revert to the default setting first. Once that’s done, you can connect any router you prefer behind it. Skipping this step may lead to double NAT, which isn’t ideal but not impossible. Ideally, have fiber connected directly to the ATT ONT (the unit provided) in bridge mode, then link your router. If possible, use an Ethernet backhaul for better performance; wireless mesh works well too.

B
Back2Blaze
Member
204
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM
#4
Your current configuration should function well. Simply assign all three routers or access points the identical SSIDs and passwords, and your devices will seamlessly switch between them. For a robust mesh or wired network, consider investing in Ubiquiti equipment. A high-end Pro SE with three customizable access points can meet your needs—though it comes with a higher cost but offers impressive performance.
B
Back2Blaze
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM #4

Your current configuration should function well. Simply assign all three routers or access points the identical SSIDs and passwords, and your devices will seamlessly switch between them. For a robust mesh or wired network, consider investing in Ubiquiti equipment. A high-end Pro SE with three customizable access points can meet your needs—though it comes with a higher cost but offers impressive performance.

B
Bioesser
Member
51
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM
#5
Choosing the same SSID for all random APs can lead to connectivity issues. Mesh networks handle this more effectively. Since you already have a mesh setup, it’s best to stick with it. Just avoid double NAT, as it may cause problems. I personally prefer Unifi solutions and manage their switches and APs myself. However, that approach isn’t ideal for those who aren’t as interested in networking. Their equipment requires more setup and adjustments, especially with Apple devices. Apple sometimes doesn’t follow standards properly, so you might need to fine-tune their gear to ensure compatibility—this can be frustrating.
B
Bioesser
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM #5

Choosing the same SSID for all random APs can lead to connectivity issues. Mesh networks handle this more effectively. Since you already have a mesh setup, it’s best to stick with it. Just avoid double NAT, as it may cause problems. I personally prefer Unifi solutions and manage their switches and APs myself. However, that approach isn’t ideal for those who aren’t as interested in networking. Their equipment requires more setup and adjustments, especially with Apple devices. Apple sometimes doesn’t follow standards properly, so you might need to fine-tune their gear to ensure compatibility—this can be frustrating.

U
UltimaArtz
Member
64
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM
#6
That's kind of ironic considering unifi was started by an ex-apple engineer. Perhaps there's a bit of bad blood between the two and apple devices purposely don't work well with unifi.
U
UltimaArtz
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM #6

That's kind of ironic considering unifi was started by an ex-apple engineer. Perhaps there's a bit of bad blood between the two and apple devices purposely don't work well with unifi.

T
TheFox2971
Member
56
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM
#7
It hasn't been the same for me.
T
TheFox2971
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM #7

It hasn't been the same for me.

R
rayku98
Member
173
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM
#8
Are you sure? It seems like there are many discussions online, and I managed to tweak some complex options to prevent issues.
R
rayku98
06-20-2025, 04:08 PM #8

Are you sure? It seems like there are many discussions online, and I managed to tweak some complex options to prevent issues.