F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Discussing RAM latency.

Discussing RAM latency.

Discussing RAM latency.

C
CrispimPT
Junior Member
23
04-02-2023, 11:03 PM
#1
You've got a solid build with good components and settings. The 70ns latency is actually quite low for RAM, so it's not a hardware problem. Double-check your RAM sticks are seated properly in dual-channel mode and ensure the CPU is correctly recognized. If XMP is enabled, confirm it's set to the right profile. Since cooling isn't an issue, focus on stability—monitor temperatures and make sure the system stays within safe limits during workloads.
C
CrispimPT
04-02-2023, 11:03 PM #1

You've got a solid build with good components and settings. The 70ns latency is actually quite low for RAM, so it's not a hardware problem. Double-check your RAM sticks are seated properly in dual-channel mode and ensure the CPU is correctly recognized. If XMP is enabled, confirm it's set to the right profile. Since cooling isn't an issue, focus on stability—monitor temperatures and make sure the system stays within safe limits during workloads.

K
Kaden4y
Member
191
04-03-2023, 05:49 AM
#2
It doesn't seem to affect your performance much, but you might want to try running tests and adjusting RAM timings.
K
Kaden4y
04-03-2023, 05:49 AM #2

It doesn't seem to affect your performance much, but you might want to try running tests and adjusting RAM timings.

I
IanHerdThat
Junior Member
11
04-10-2023, 04:26 AM
#3
USERBENCHMARK is unreliable. I tested it several times on my laptop and it reported graphics issues, indicating weak integrated performance. People don't recommend using it. Also, it claims timing matches most SODIMM types, but in my case they were around 70ns.
I
IanHerdThat
04-10-2023, 04:26 AM #3

USERBENCHMARK is unreliable. I tested it several times on my laptop and it reported graphics issues, indicating weak integrated performance. People don't recommend using it. Also, it claims timing matches most SODIMM types, but in my case they were around 70ns.