F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop discussing low TDP CPU (keeping the 6600K) and a question about low power GPU with three 1440p displays.

discussing low TDP CPU (keeping the 6600K) and a question about low power GPU with three 1440p displays.

discussing low TDP CPU (keeping the 6600K) and a question about low power GPU with three 1440p displays.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
W
WomboDzn
Member
130
03-17-2016, 08:15 PM
#11
They shared it in a video, hehe.
W
WomboDzn
03-17-2016, 08:15 PM #11

They shared it in a video, hehe.

H
HellNether
Senior Member
731
03-17-2016, 09:44 PM
#12
have one
H
HellNether
03-17-2016, 09:44 PM #12

have one

D
Daantjeplays
Member
157
03-20-2016, 10:59 AM
#13
I wasn't sure about the structure, but I was considering using a faster CPU and possibly disabling cores to reduce performance. However, I don’t think overclocking will always be stable.
D
Daantjeplays
03-20-2016, 10:59 AM #13

I wasn't sure about the structure, but I was considering using a faster CPU and possibly disabling cores to reduce performance. However, I don’t think overclocking will always be stable.

C
cobra_9041
Member
65
03-21-2016, 08:22 AM
#14
Among all the power evaluations I've performed, you won't see significant savings by switching to a newer desktop setup. These machines can run at less than 20 watts idle, and most of your energy use comes from components other than the processor. How much power are you currently consuming? Please share your full system details. To achieve real power reductions, you'd need to move to low-power CPUs found in laptops or M1 Mac Mini models, similar to them.
C
cobra_9041
03-21-2016, 08:22 AM #14

Among all the power evaluations I've performed, you won't see significant savings by switching to a newer desktop setup. These machines can run at less than 20 watts idle, and most of your energy use comes from components other than the processor. How much power are you currently consuming? Please share your full system details. To achieve real power reductions, you'd need to move to low-power CPUs found in laptops or M1 Mac Mini models, similar to them.

F
FoxayFella
Member
163
04-05-2016, 01:11 PM
#15
5950x stands out as the most energy-efficient CPU-to-performance ratio ever, per Gamers Nexus. You can tweak the BIOS settings to match your power needs, and it will deliver top performance while staying around 60 watts. That makes it one of the best options available at that power level.
F
FoxayFella
04-05-2016, 01:11 PM #15

5950x stands out as the most energy-efficient CPU-to-performance ratio ever, per Gamers Nexus. You can tweak the BIOS settings to match your power needs, and it will deliver top performance while staying around 60 watts. That makes it one of the best options available at that power level.

T
TheDarkTiger74
Junior Member
43
04-07-2016, 05:45 AM
#16
just the tower, no monitors at idle, around 95w with a GTX 1080. I have a RTX 3090 and an X299, which saves power but it's a gaming PC, so I probably don't need much for just browsing.
T
TheDarkTiger74
04-07-2016, 05:45 AM #16

just the tower, no monitors at idle, around 95w with a GTX 1080. I have a RTX 3090 and an X299, which saves power but it's a gaming PC, so I probably don't need much for just browsing.

F
FrancisDragon
Member
213
04-28-2016, 03:59 PM
#17
Here are the remaining details. Drives, PSU, cooling systems—those specs can change fast. The 1080 model consumes a significant amount of power even when idle, especially with two displays. I plan to remove it and test the GPU using IGPU to assess potential savings. Likely much of that efficiency comes from the GPU itself.
F
FrancisDragon
04-28-2016, 03:59 PM #17

Here are the remaining details. Drives, PSU, cooling systems—those specs can change fast. The 1080 model consumes a significant amount of power even when idle, especially with two displays. I plan to remove it and test the GPU using IGPU to assess potential savings. Likely much of that efficiency comes from the GPU itself.

S
SuperHippo
Junior Member
42
05-16-2016, 12:07 AM
#18
To conserve energy on your PC without gaming needs, simply lower the refresh rate to 1080 and rely on built-in graphics. I still believe investing in the latest desktop components for efficiency is often unnecessary. Even reducing idle power use by half brings you to just 40 watts. When you factor in electricity costs measured in kilowatt-hours, you might see years before the savings offset the expense. For better efficiency, consider a laptop or Chromebook instead.
S
SuperHippo
05-16-2016, 12:07 AM #18

To conserve energy on your PC without gaming needs, simply lower the refresh rate to 1080 and rely on built-in graphics. I still believe investing in the latest desktop components for efficiency is often unnecessary. Even reducing idle power use by half brings you to just 40 watts. When you factor in electricity costs measured in kilowatt-hours, you might see years before the savings offset the expense. For better efficiency, consider a laptop or Chromebook instead.

Y
yalo29
Senior Member
641
05-31-2016, 09:44 AM
#19
Likely you're using a 65W CPU, leaving the rest for the GPU. You have a D15 PSU from Corsair, and only two fans are connected—those with low-power resistors. The SSD is an ASUS Sabertooth Z170 Mark 1.
Y
yalo29
05-31-2016, 09:44 AM #19

Likely you're using a 65W CPU, leaving the rest for the GPU. You have a D15 PSU from Corsair, and only two fans are connected—those with low-power resistors. The SSD is an ASUS Sabertooth Z170 Mark 1.

A
ash_n_brad
Posting Freak
778
05-31-2016, 10:07 AM
#20
you have three monitors set up at 2560x1140 resolution, 170Hz refresh rate, using DP or HDMI. you’d likely need a low-power GPU capable of handling that performance.
A
ash_n_brad
05-31-2016, 10:07 AM #20

you have three monitors set up at 2560x1140 resolution, 170Hz refresh rate, using DP or HDMI. you’d likely need a low-power GPU capable of handling that performance.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next