F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Discrepancies in Memory Clock and Timing

Discrepancies in Memory Clock and Timing

Discrepancies in Memory Clock and Timing

I
iXenom
Junior Member
27
03-10-2016, 02:09 PM
#1
It's puzzling why some reports claim your DDR2 is actually running DDR3 at 1333mhz.
I
iXenom
03-10-2016, 02:09 PM #1

It's puzzling why some reports claim your DDR2 is actually running DDR3 at 1333mhz.

C
CasqerMedQ
Member
121
03-10-2016, 03:05 PM
#2
It seems the DRAM is DDR3 1333, while the other component is displaying the default settings for a 775 motherboard.
C
CasqerMedQ
03-10-2016, 03:05 PM #2

It seems the DRAM is DDR3 1333, while the other component is displaying the default settings for a 775 motherboard.

D
Dagur011
Junior Member
18
03-10-2016, 04:49 PM
#3
It seems the DRAM is DDR3 1333, while the other components are showing default values for a 775 motherboard. The setup includes four 2GB DDR2 PC2-6400 Gei Black Dragon sticks, with a GB24GB6400C5DC motherboard.
D
Dagur011
03-10-2016, 04:49 PM #3

It seems the DRAM is DDR3 1333, while the other components are showing default values for a 775 motherboard. The setup includes four 2GB DDR2 PC2-6400 Gei Black Dragon sticks, with a GB24GB6400C5DC motherboard.

D
davidspyro
Member
213
03-14-2016, 09:47 AM
#4
Weird! I've seen CPU-Z off a few times, but nothing like this.
D
davidspyro
03-14-2016, 09:47 AM #4

Weird! I've seen CPU-Z off a few times, but nothing like this.

M
Morgan_98
Member
103
03-16-2016, 05:11 AM
#5
Tradesman1 :
Weird! I've seen CPU-Z off a few times, but nothing like this.
It's a strange case.
I tried various methods, but couldn't get accurate readings in CPU Z or Speccy. Probably because both rely on the same detection process for speeds/clock, leading to false results (likely due to older hardware).
Aida64 and others seem to get the RAM right.
I ran some system tests and benchmarks, found nothing wrong, so I guess I'll just skip it.
M
Morgan_98
03-16-2016, 05:11 AM #5

Tradesman1 :
Weird! I've seen CPU-Z off a few times, but nothing like this.
It's a strange case.
I tried various methods, but couldn't get accurate readings in CPU Z or Speccy. Probably because both rely on the same detection process for speeds/clock, leading to false results (likely due to older hardware).
Aida64 and others seem to get the RAM right.
I ran some system tests and benchmarks, found nothing wrong, so I guess I'll just skip it.