F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop DDR4, Alder Lake architecture may experience memory controller issues over time.

DDR4, Alder Lake architecture may experience memory controller issues over time.

DDR4, Alder Lake architecture may experience memory controller issues over time.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
T
tippestwolf70
Member
227
07-02-2016, 03:08 PM
#1
I previously asked a similar question on another forum about DDR4 RAM. I wanted to find out if it's possible to use this type of RAM in Gear 1 at XMP with 1.4V while the silicone stars are aligned, and whether it would still last. The setup I mentioned is a F4-4000C16D-32GTZR Trident Z RGB DDR4-4000 CL16-16-16-36 1.40V, 32GB (2x16GB). It seems there was a lot of debate about the durability of the memory controller under those conditions. One person expressed concern that it might not be reliable over time, while another seemed confident that running above 1.5V would be fine. I'm still trying to figure this out, as my motherboard might be the issue, or perhaps the RAM itself. I'm not sure if it's just speculation, but I'm hoping to get more clarity before deciding whether to buy new RAM. Thanks for your input!
T
tippestwolf70
07-02-2016, 03:08 PM #1

I previously asked a similar question on another forum about DDR4 RAM. I wanted to find out if it's possible to use this type of RAM in Gear 1 at XMP with 1.4V while the silicone stars are aligned, and whether it would still last. The setup I mentioned is a F4-4000C16D-32GTZR Trident Z RGB DDR4-4000 CL16-16-16-36 1.40V, 32GB (2x16GB). It seems there was a lot of debate about the durability of the memory controller under those conditions. One person expressed concern that it might not be reliable over time, while another seemed confident that running above 1.5V would be fine. I'm still trying to figure this out, as my motherboard might be the issue, or perhaps the RAM itself. I'm not sure if it's just speculation, but I'm hoping to get more clarity before deciding whether to buy new RAM. Thanks for your input!

G
211
07-02-2016, 04:07 PM
#2
Honest opinions? Companies making RAM should face legal action and stop this nonsense. When you build a kit priced at 4000-5000 for DDR4, it’s unrealistic. No CPU can actually run it without a lot of effort—it’s just misleading marketing. I’d suggest sticking strictly to what the manufacturer lists for compatibility and CPU specs, avoiding headaches. Most DDR4 4000+ kits are difficult to use properly and can cause issues over time. Your IMC won’t be harmed, but performance may suffer if you ignore the guidelines.
G
george_griveas
07-02-2016, 04:07 PM #2

Honest opinions? Companies making RAM should face legal action and stop this nonsense. When you build a kit priced at 4000-5000 for DDR4, it’s unrealistic. No CPU can actually run it without a lot of effort—it’s just misleading marketing. I’d suggest sticking strictly to what the manufacturer lists for compatibility and CPU specs, avoiding headaches. Most DDR4 4000+ kits are difficult to use properly and can cause issues over time. Your IMC won’t be harmed, but performance may suffer if you ignore the guidelines.

G
GoonerOliver
Member
206
07-02-2016, 05:52 PM
#3
According to what I understand, vDIMM mainly influences the RAM directly, not the memory controller. Excessive vDIMM can damage memory modules but not controllers. If you're referring to VCCSA and VCCIO—the actual voltages for the memory controller—then exceeding 1.4V daily is reasonable, and Alder Lake likely prefers closer to 1.3-1.35V for stability. I'm on the safer side at around 1.5V, unless you're overclocking. My setup uses a 5900X with dual rank B dies at 3800MT/s, running at 1.5V, which has worked well for years. If the chips were less durable (like some Samsung or Hynix options), I'd avoid going above 1.35V, though that's more about the memory sticks than the CPU controller.
G
GoonerOliver
07-02-2016, 05:52 PM #3

According to what I understand, vDIMM mainly influences the RAM directly, not the memory controller. Excessive vDIMM can damage memory modules but not controllers. If you're referring to VCCSA and VCCIO—the actual voltages for the memory controller—then exceeding 1.4V daily is reasonable, and Alder Lake likely prefers closer to 1.3-1.35V for stability. I'm on the safer side at around 1.5V, unless you're overclocking. My setup uses a 5900X with dual rank B dies at 3800MT/s, running at 1.5V, which has worked well for years. If the chips were less durable (like some Samsung or Hynix options), I'd avoid going above 1.35V, though that's more about the memory sticks than the CPU controller.

M
MikeDragon159
Senior Member
661
07-02-2016, 07:20 PM
#4
Finding a suitable voltage range where the imc begins to fail naturally can serve as a safety benchmark. It seems 1.8v marks the point where imc starts deteriorating, so keeping it at or below 1.45v for the imc voltage is wise. For ram voltages, good performance is typically around 4000 cl14 at about 1.5v, which suggests your setup is solid. You can safely increase ram voltage as long as it doesn’t cause degradation. Passive cooling is best around 1.5v, while active cooling works better at 1.6v or higher, but be careful not to push your rams beyond their limits. 1.5v is ideal for passive cooling, and 1.6v for active cooling. For specific rams, around 2.05v is the threshold where they start to fail, so aim for up to 1.7v if you want to test your limits and notice any issues. Voltage extremes are a useful guide, though they aren’t perfect references.
M
MikeDragon159
07-02-2016, 07:20 PM #4

Finding a suitable voltage range where the imc begins to fail naturally can serve as a safety benchmark. It seems 1.8v marks the point where imc starts deteriorating, so keeping it at or below 1.45v for the imc voltage is wise. For ram voltages, good performance is typically around 4000 cl14 at about 1.5v, which suggests your setup is solid. You can safely increase ram voltage as long as it doesn’t cause degradation. Passive cooling is best around 1.5v, while active cooling works better at 1.6v or higher, but be careful not to push your rams beyond their limits. 1.5v is ideal for passive cooling, and 1.6v for active cooling. For specific rams, around 2.05v is the threshold where they start to fail, so aim for up to 1.7v if you want to test your limits and notice any issues. Voltage extremes are a useful guide, though they aren’t perfect references.

P
pepsitaroh
Member
209
07-04-2016, 09:21 AM
#5
I used a RAM kit rated around 1.5V, but the Intel Alder Lake CPU suggests a max of 1350 mV plus 5% (about 1417.5 mV). That means I should have chosen kits at or below 1.4V. The F4-4000C16D-32GTZR at 1.4V fits the recommendation. You're right, it should work at that voltage.
P
pepsitaroh
07-04-2016, 09:21 AM #5

I used a RAM kit rated around 1.5V, but the Intel Alder Lake CPU suggests a max of 1350 mV plus 5% (about 1417.5 mV). That means I should have chosen kits at or below 1.4V. The F4-4000C16D-32GTZR at 1.4V fits the recommendation. You're right, it should work at that voltage.

G
Gala_Driend
Junior Member
22
07-06-2016, 05:18 AM
#6
You're overlooking some of the challenges with B die performance. I've tested four different kits—three G.Skill and one Adata—and none reached 4000MHz CL16 at 1.5v. Even with a 4400MHz CL17, which is in the higher frequency range, it's not ideal for everyday use. The 4000MHz CL14 is better suited for lower frequencies, which isn't great for daily cases.
G
Gala_Driend
07-06-2016, 05:18 AM #6

You're overlooking some of the challenges with B die performance. I've tested four different kits—three G.Skill and one Adata—and none reached 4000MHz CL16 at 1.5v. Even with a 4400MHz CL17, which is in the higher frequency range, it's not ideal for everyday use. The 4000MHz CL14 is better suited for lower frequencies, which isn't great for daily cases.

Z
Zyrn
Member
54
07-06-2016, 06:40 AM
#7
Absolutely understandable. It's confusing why Intel sets a maximum spec for vDIMM when it doesn't seem to impact the CPU performance.
Z
Zyrn
07-06-2016, 06:40 AM #7

Absolutely understandable. It's confusing why Intel sets a maximum spec for vDIMM when it doesn't seem to impact the CPU performance.

Z
zlip88
Member
198
07-06-2016, 11:15 AM
#8
You don't want to run 1.7V, thank you for the details. I'm hoping the kit I have will function properly and I won't need to purchase additional parts. I'm trusting that it was my X99 Motherboard from the start, which is quite old.
Z
zlip88
07-06-2016, 11:15 AM #8

You don't want to run 1.7V, thank you for the details. I'm hoping the kit I have will function properly and I won't need to purchase additional parts. I'm trusting that it was my X99 Motherboard from the start, which is quite old.

I
IronHammer12
Member
50
07-08-2016, 07:50 AM
#9
Your X99 motherboard seems damaged because it lacks the necessary CPUs for 4000MHz speeds. The 1.4V rating might have been sufficient, but the absence of compatible chips is the issue.
I
IronHammer12
07-08-2016, 07:50 AM #9

Your X99 motherboard seems damaged because it lacks the necessary CPUs for 4000MHz speeds. The 1.4V rating might have been sufficient, but the absence of compatible chips is the issue.

T
TY_4607
Junior Member
3
07-08-2016, 12:49 PM
#10
Using this insight I’ll destroy all bets (especially cheap ones like Corsair) and suggest Ballistix. It didn’t really understand Ballistix’s quality, but it definitely breaks down now and for a low price. Just keep it around ~1.5v without active cooling—otherwise the rams could overheat and cause errors.
T
TY_4607
07-08-2016, 12:49 PM #10

Using this insight I’ll destroy all bets (especially cheap ones like Corsair) and suggest Ballistix. It didn’t really understand Ballistix’s quality, but it definitely breaks down now and for a low price. Just keep it around ~1.5v without active cooling—otherwise the rams could overheat and cause errors.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next