F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop DDR4-4000 represents the optimal performance for Zen 3 processors.

DDR4-4000 represents the optimal performance for Zen 3 processors.

DDR4-4000 represents the optimal performance for Zen 3 processors.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
X
XDMillie
Junior Member
33
01-01-2019, 03:38 AM
#1
I'm unsure if the extra cost is justified for quicker memory. It's unclear whether DDR4-3600 CL16 is actually inferior to DDR4-4000 CL18.
X
XDMillie
01-01-2019, 03:38 AM #1

I'm unsure if the extra cost is justified for quicker memory. It's unclear whether DDR4-3600 CL16 is actually inferior to DDR4-4000 CL18.

P
PiiCatchU
Junior Member
20
01-02-2019, 06:49 PM
#2
WCCFTECH isn't a reliable place for gathering information, particularly about rumors. Their accuracy is questionable most of the time.
P
PiiCatchU
01-02-2019, 06:49 PM #2

WCCFTECH isn't a reliable place for gathering information, particularly about rumors. Their accuracy is questionable most of the time.

L
LuigiXGames
Senior Member
426
01-02-2019, 07:58 PM
#3
I discovered identical information from a highly trustworthy German website. For German listeners: https://www.hardwareluxx.de/index.php/ne...-cpus.html
L
LuigiXGames
01-02-2019, 07:58 PM #3

I discovered identical information from a highly trustworthy German website. For German listeners: https://www.hardwareluxx.de/index.php/ne...-cpus.html

N
Niclin13
Member
193
01-03-2019, 11:10 AM
#4
The comparison highlights DDR4-4000 versus DDR4-3800 across different Zen architectures. While 3600 was seen as the optimal clock speed at Zen 2's release, achieving it consistently proved challenging. Did subsequent releases enhance stability so that 3800 could run at a comparable rate? Keep in mind this applies mainly to performance enthusiasts—we're likely well past the typical value range.
N
Niclin13
01-03-2019, 11:10 AM #4

The comparison highlights DDR4-4000 versus DDR4-3800 across different Zen architectures. While 3600 was seen as the optimal clock speed at Zen 2's release, achieving it consistently proved challenging. Did subsequent releases enhance stability so that 3800 could run at a comparable rate? Keep in mind this applies mainly to performance enthusiasts—we're likely well past the typical value range.

R
rosie2435
Senior Member
475
01-03-2019, 04:23 PM
#5
Making it easy for people to use clocks with 65$ memory kits is exciting!
R
rosie2435
01-03-2019, 04:23 PM #5

Making it easy for people to use clocks with 65$ memory kits is exciting!

M
mineuout482
Posting Freak
812
01-11-2019, 05:03 AM
#6
Why would people connect to content from that site? It seems many might be drawn to similar groups like cults, MLMs, or telemarketers.
M
mineuout482
01-11-2019, 05:03 AM #6

Why would people connect to content from that site? It seems many might be drawn to similar groups like cults, MLMs, or telemarketers.

L
lokapso_SP
Member
77
01-18-2019, 02:36 AM
#7
From my perspective, they somewhat shape the content, making it distinct from ordinary random material, yet avoid presenting it as a reliable reference. This makes them useful for catching up on current trends.
L
lokapso_SP
01-18-2019, 02:36 AM #7

From my perspective, they somewhat shape the content, making it distinct from ordinary random material, yet avoid presenting it as a reliable reference. This makes them useful for catching up on current trends.

H
HydraEliphant
Member
212
01-20-2019, 09:33 AM
#8
Lol. The CL15 is around sixty dollars. It's a high-end B-Die board and should handle its rated speed as long as the AMD IMC works well and the interface stays stable at 2000MHz without excessive voltage stress. A little caution, but it's doable. If AMD can support DDR4 like Intel, most 3600MHz B-Die models from CL16 to CL36 could likely be upgraded to 4000MHz. That’s something to consider before jumping to higher speeds. I’d like to explore faster interface speeds too—would help with bandwidth.
H
HydraEliphant
01-20-2019, 09:33 AM #8

Lol. The CL15 is around sixty dollars. It's a high-end B-Die board and should handle its rated speed as long as the AMD IMC works well and the interface stays stable at 2000MHz without excessive voltage stress. A little caution, but it's doable. If AMD can support DDR4 like Intel, most 3600MHz B-Die models from CL16 to CL36 could likely be upgraded to 4000MHz. That’s something to consider before jumping to higher speeds. I’d like to explore faster interface speeds too—would help with bandwidth.

S
Sneakyginger8
Senior Member
580
01-20-2019, 08:07 PM
#9
In a recent Buildzoid clip he mentions the substrate as the key factor affecting IF's performance, noting that even with the same IF, changing the substrate could improve its speed on the R5K. Fascinating commentary!
S
Sneakyginger8
01-20-2019, 08:07 PM #9

In a recent Buildzoid clip he mentions the substrate as the key factor affecting IF's performance, noting that even with the same IF, changing the substrate could improve its speed on the R5K. Fascinating commentary!

I
iFelleHD
Member
74
01-21-2019, 07:40 AM
#10
Accepts the idea while noting that Infinity Fabric is still emerging, unlike the Hyper Transport connection found in earlier FX, Phenom, and Athlon chips. At the time of FX’s development, Hyper Transport could reach above 3000mhz, but began below 1000mhz with Athlon. Higher speeds in Infinity Fabric are likely achievable as the Zen series progresses.
I
iFelleHD
01-21-2019, 07:40 AM #10

Accepts the idea while noting that Infinity Fabric is still emerging, unlike the Hyper Transport connection found in earlier FX, Phenom, and Athlon chips. At the time of FX’s development, Hyper Transport could reach above 3000mhz, but began below 1000mhz with Athlon. Higher speeds in Infinity Fabric are likely achievable as the Zen series progresses.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next