Cyberpunk will endure.
Cyberpunk will endure.
They are definitively not the worst site available. They previously were quite poor, exceeding five years ago. Considering they have existed for eleven years, their initial years were laughable. It is a factual observation; veteran forum members would confirm this directly. Whether they are currently accurate remains uncertain, and I did not intend to suggest that the source of paper specifications was accurate, as it isn't. The site coincidentally possesses identical specs to other current sources, despite claiming to represent the "minimum" requirements, which is demonstrably false. I clearly indicated the presence of numerous conditional statements due to the absence of actual specifications.
The Witcher 3 benchmarks on Ultra, with Hairworks enabled and other settings, were not performed by anyone.
https://www.techspot.com/review/1006-the...page7.html
HardOCP Community Forum for PC Hardware Enthusiasts
www.hardocp.com
To clarify, I did not intend to criticize you; however, your initial statement referenced the present, and my subsequent comments aimed to update you on changes. I believe the site was mediocre before 2010 and am not referring to its original state. It seemed appropriate to review and reassess your opinion after approximately 11 years since its launch. To avoid derailing the discussion, I addressed the original poster with the following: As a general rule, do not rely on any system requirements until developers release official specifications through their own channels or official outlets. Simple. Tech news outlets will provide benchmarking results for more accurate system requirement data and performance numbers.
CDPR is one of few companies that does good work in optimization of their games; the system shown at E3 is likely designed for activating everything in ultra settings.