F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Curve optimizer for 7800X3D per core

Curve optimizer for 7800X3D per core

Curve optimizer for 7800X3D per core

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
T
themazegames
Junior Member
15
05-02-2023, 12:06 PM
#1
I evaluated each core individually and identified the optimal range for every one. However, during a full-body stress test, the system freezes immediately. I’m puzzled by this behavior.
T
themazegames
05-02-2023, 12:06 PM #1

I evaluated each core individually and identified the optimal range for every one. However, during a full-body stress test, the system freezes immediately. I’m puzzled by this behavior.

W
Windiox
Member
226
05-04-2023, 10:39 AM
#2
The per core values focuses on essential principles, while the all core value includes additional aspects beyond those basics.
W
Windiox
05-04-2023, 10:39 AM #2

The per core values focuses on essential principles, while the all core value includes additional aspects beyond those basics.

G
Gatoscrim
Junior Member
39
05-04-2023, 12:24 PM
#3
30, 29, 21, 24, 16, 22, 28, 29 all are core 19
G
Gatoscrim
05-04-2023, 12:24 PM #3

30, 29, 21, 24, 16, 22, 28, 29 all are core 19

Y
124
05-07-2023, 12:27 AM
#4
All your main cores are surpassing one individual core, which is probably the cause. Would you like to try running all cores at -15?
Y
YourBoyBarcode
05-07-2023, 12:27 AM #4

All your main cores are surpassing one individual core, which is probably the cause. Would you like to try running all cores at -15?

A
ALGA0205
Junior Member
36
05-08-2023, 10:37 AM
#5
I need clarification, or perhaps I missed some details. We aren't aligned yet. I'm not aiming to increase the frequency. I'm reducing the voltage. My multiplier is set automatically, and my optimizer uses a negative value. A higher number equals lower voltage, correct? If I can handle -19, why would I choose -15? When one core is stressed alone it seeks -16, but with all cores together it's comfortable at -19.
A
ALGA0205
05-08-2023, 10:37 AM #5

I need clarification, or perhaps I missed some details. We aren't aligned yet. I'm not aiming to increase the frequency. I'm reducing the voltage. My multiplier is set automatically, and my optimizer uses a negative value. A higher number equals lower voltage, correct? If I can handle -19, why would I choose -15? When one core is stressed alone it seeks -16, but with all cores together it's comfortable at -19.

F
FistMeAway
Member
225
05-08-2023, 10:56 AM
#6
One of your components isn't functioning at -19, so it's limited to -16. You're attempting to reduce voltage, but this part requires more than that. With 100 base you're only applying 81 (using a -19), yet the core indicates it can handle -16, which is 84 volts. Overloading or underpowering it can lead to problems. Remember, each core has its own power needs—giving too little or too much can cause issues.
F
FistMeAway
05-08-2023, 10:56 AM #6

One of your components isn't functioning at -19, so it's limited to -16. You're attempting to reduce voltage, but this part requires more than that. With 100 base you're only applying 81 (using a -19), yet the core indicates it can handle -16, which is 84 volts. Overloading or underpowering it can lead to problems. Remember, each core has its own power needs—giving too little or too much can cause issues.

L
LilWaynz
Junior Member
24
05-09-2023, 11:08 AM
#7
you're asking about why one core works at -19 while others struggle. it seems the voltage setting might be affecting performance differently per core. your approach of starting all cores at -0 and gradually increasing stress is logical. the method you described for cycling through cores after each test appears sound. just confirm if adjusting the per-core settings consistently helps, or if further tweaks are needed.
L
LilWaynz
05-09-2023, 11:08 AM #7

you're asking about why one core works at -19 while others struggle. it seems the voltage setting might be affecting performance differently per core. your approach of starting all cores at -0 and gradually increasing stress is logical. the method you described for cycling through cores after each test appears sound. just confirm if adjusting the per-core settings consistently helps, or if further tweaks are needed.

U
Umbreon090
Junior Member
38
05-15-2023, 03:50 AM
#8
What does this mean? Your initial comment limits the starter post. Running all cores at -19 instantly causes a crash. Now you're suggesting -19 is acceptable. The smaller the number (like -19 versus -16), the lower the voltage. It's important to recognize that stressing all cores together affects the CPU differently than stressing just one core. When every core is under load, it draws more current and uses more power from the CPU components, such as the cache or Infinity Fabric, leading to greater voltage drop and other issues.
U
Umbreon090
05-15-2023, 03:50 AM #8

What does this mean? Your initial comment limits the starter post. Running all cores at -19 instantly causes a crash. Now you're suggesting -19 is acceptable. The smaller the number (like -19 versus -16), the lower the voltage. It's important to recognize that stressing all cores together affects the CPU differently than stressing just one core. When every core is under load, it draws more current and uses more power from the CPU components, such as the cache or Infinity Fabric, leading to greater voltage drop and other issues.

A
angelicvoids
Junior Member
1
05-16-2023, 08:04 PM
#9
All core stress tests remain consistent. Using this pattern, each core test stays steady, while the overall stability varies. The sequence provided reflects these trends.
A
angelicvoids
05-16-2023, 08:04 PM #9

All core stress tests remain consistent. Using this pattern, each core test stays steady, while the overall stability varies. The sequence provided reflects these trends.

S
snoffy
Member
119
05-16-2023, 08:51 PM
#10
Core stability can vary simultaneously—some aspects remain steady while others shift. The values that are most inconsistent are those that don’t hold firm.
S
snoffy
05-16-2023, 08:51 PM #10

Core stability can vary simultaneously—some aspects remain steady while others shift. The values that are most inconsistent are those that don’t hold firm.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next