F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Curve adjustment for Ryzen 5600x and its power constraints

Curve adjustment for Ryzen 5600x and its power constraints

Curve adjustment for Ryzen 5600x and its power constraints

S
steel51
Member
205
08-20-2020, 08:33 PM
#1
Hello, I’m using a Ryzen 5600X on an ASRock B550 Pro4 with Noctua U12s Redux. This summer I’ve experienced more heat than usual, reaching up to 75°C during heavy 4-core stress without any overclocking or clock speed increase. On one core it stayed below 68°C, while 12 threads never exceeded 64°C. I was surprised because last summer I never went past 65°C. After researching, I compared my CPU’s voltages and power usage with another unit that ran in default settings. It seemed my chip draws about 0.050V more than the friend’s under normal conditions. During 4-core stress, the VCore voltage varied—1.35V for 4 cores, 1.3V for 2 cores, and 1.41V for 1 core. This suggests higher voltages on certain cores. I tried using Curve Optimizer with -19 all cores and +200MHz boost, but it caused frequent BSODs and reduced performance. Eventually, I switched to the -30 All Core setting, which gave me better stability, lower temperatures, and fewer crashes in games like Fortnite, GTA V, and Valorant. I’ve set it to CO -30 All Core, PPT 85 TDC 75 EDC 100. The results are stable, with temps around 56-69°C and only minor instability in some titles. While I still experience occasional BSODs, especially in games, the overall performance is much smoother now.
S
steel51
08-20-2020, 08:33 PM #1

Hello, I’m using a Ryzen 5600X on an ASRock B550 Pro4 with Noctua U12s Redux. This summer I’ve experienced more heat than usual, reaching up to 75°C during heavy 4-core stress without any overclocking or clock speed increase. On one core it stayed below 68°C, while 12 threads never exceeded 64°C. I was surprised because last summer I never went past 65°C. After researching, I compared my CPU’s voltages and power usage with another unit that ran in default settings. It seemed my chip draws about 0.050V more than the friend’s under normal conditions. During 4-core stress, the VCore voltage varied—1.35V for 4 cores, 1.3V for 2 cores, and 1.41V for 1 core. This suggests higher voltages on certain cores. I tried using Curve Optimizer with -19 all cores and +200MHz boost, but it caused frequent BSODs and reduced performance. Eventually, I switched to the -30 All Core setting, which gave me better stability, lower temperatures, and fewer crashes in games like Fortnite, GTA V, and Valorant. I’ve set it to CO -30 All Core, PPT 85 TDC 75 EDC 100. The results are stable, with temps around 56-69°C and only minor instability in some titles. While I still experience occasional BSODs, especially in games, the overall performance is much smoother now.

X
xLikax
Member
173
08-20-2020, 11:49 PM
#2
Power limits don't influence stability. CO -30, however, restricts only a few CPUs across all cores. Since you're encountering BSODs even with lighter tasks, this seems to be the root cause now. Try setting it to -15 and they should become less common or disappear entirely in the best case. The core boost offset is mostly a myth—it doesn't significantly impact performance and rarely alters frequency. On certain AGESA versions it may have no effect at all. Indeed, your cores 3 and 4 might be underperforming. Lower the Curve Optimizer setting. This tool is tricky to use and often leads to crashes. It nonlinearly cuts voltage, performing worse under light loads than heavy ones, which explains passing tests but failing in real-world scenarios like browsing social media.
X
xLikax
08-20-2020, 11:49 PM #2

Power limits don't influence stability. CO -30, however, restricts only a few CPUs across all cores. Since you're encountering BSODs even with lighter tasks, this seems to be the root cause now. Try setting it to -15 and they should become less common or disappear entirely in the best case. The core boost offset is mostly a myth—it doesn't significantly impact performance and rarely alters frequency. On certain AGESA versions it may have no effect at all. Indeed, your cores 3 and 4 might be underperforming. Lower the Curve Optimizer setting. This tool is tricky to use and often leads to crashes. It nonlinearly cuts voltage, performing worse under light loads than heavy ones, which explains passing tests but failing in real-world scenarios like browsing social media.

G
GoobieBubba
Member
183
08-21-2020, 08:10 AM
#3
I provide the CPU with the maximum power the socket supports. I don’t recall the original settings for my 5600X after I accidentally deleted them. Now I just set it to 200/160/190 plus 200 minus 28. It works well for corecycler at +150, though I’m not sure about that program. I give it the full +200 and it performs very well.
G
GoobieBubba
08-21-2020, 08:10 AM #3

I provide the CPU with the maximum power the socket supports. I don’t recall the original settings for my 5600X after I accidentally deleted them. Now I just set it to 200/160/190 plus 200 minus 28. It works well for corecycler at +150, though I’m not sure about that program. I give it the full +200 and it performs very well.

A
AndyTEAM
Member
143
08-24-2020, 12:30 PM
#4
I adjusted CO to -15. All components now share identical power limits. Performance shifted to match these values: single core at 4649Hz, 1.363v, temperature around 67-68°C, 58W on two cores at 4640Hz, 1.365v, 69-70°C, four cores at 4580Hz, 1.361v, 77-78°C, 80W under load with 75% fan speed. Fan limits at 6 cores reach 4515Hz, 1.335v, 72-73°C, 87W on 12 cores at 4410Hz, 1.262v, 71-72°C, idle 87W at 46°C. Room temperature remains unconfirmed but likely between 20-30°C. My concern is the high temperatures on my #2, #3, and #4 cores—should I turn off custom limits? Disabling would lower temps by at least 5°C.
A
AndyTEAM
08-24-2020, 12:30 PM #4

I adjusted CO to -15. All components now share identical power limits. Performance shifted to match these values: single core at 4649Hz, 1.363v, temperature around 67-68°C, 58W on two cores at 4640Hz, 1.365v, 69-70°C, four cores at 4580Hz, 1.361v, 77-78°C, 80W under load with 75% fan speed. Fan limits at 6 cores reach 4515Hz, 1.335v, 72-73°C, 87W on 12 cores at 4410Hz, 1.262v, 71-72°C, idle 87W at 46°C. Room temperature remains unconfirmed but likely between 20-30°C. My concern is the high temperatures on my #2, #3, and #4 cores—should I turn off custom limits? Disabling would lower temps by at least 5°C.

I
iDoNotEvenLift
Posting Freak
936
08-24-2020, 09:28 PM
#5
.
I
iDoNotEvenLift
08-24-2020, 09:28 PM #5

.

T
The_D3mon
Senior Member
694
08-26-2020, 12:15 PM
#6
Uncertain about whether it's safe to lower the power limits—it feels like a problem when the max drops to 110 watts after removing it, and the +200 boost only functions at -30 CO. Also, frequent crashes are happening.
T
The_D3mon
08-26-2020, 12:15 PM #6

Uncertain about whether it's safe to lower the power limits—it feels like a problem when the max drops to 110 watts after removing it, and the +200 boost only functions at -30 CO. Also, frequent crashes are happening.

G
GumpyGamer
Junior Member
37
08-27-2020, 03:22 PM
#7
110w is a bit insufficient; aim for 125-135w instead.
G
GumpyGamer
08-27-2020, 03:22 PM #7

110w is a bit insufficient; aim for 125-135w instead.

T
trandat
Member
140
08-27-2020, 06:28 PM
#8
It seems the power cap depends on the Mobo's constraints, or maybe I misunderstood!
T
trandat
08-27-2020, 06:28 PM #8

It seems the power cap depends on the Mobo's constraints, or maybe I misunderstood!

F
flyers_28
Junior Member
15
08-27-2020, 11:15 PM
#9
I dive deeper, exploring advanced concepts and defining my own boundaries.
F
flyers_28
08-27-2020, 11:15 PM #9

I dive deeper, exploring advanced concepts and defining my own boundaries.