F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Current motherboards with a PCI slot remain available for use.

Current motherboards with a PCI slot remain available for use.

Current motherboards with a PCI slot remain available for use.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
N
nohubris
Junior Member
2
07-08-2019, 06:13 AM
#11
Seeking boards with built-in PCI requires checking older chip designs. Modern boards rely on PCI-E to PCI bridge chips or PCI-E X1 to PCI controllers, which may not always be fully compatible with PCI. AM3+ is likely the final AMD model supporting native PCI. Possibly newer options exist with AM3+ or FM2 sockets, but AM3+ remains the most reliable. For Intel, it's unclear when PCI was removed, but LGA1366 seems to be the last major version. Even with a PCI-E X1 to PCI adapter, you might face driver issues and incompatibility with Windows 10 or 11.
N
nohubris
07-08-2019, 06:13 AM #11

Seeking boards with built-in PCI requires checking older chip designs. Modern boards rely on PCI-E to PCI bridge chips or PCI-E X1 to PCI controllers, which may not always be fully compatible with PCI. AM3+ is likely the final AMD model supporting native PCI. Possibly newer options exist with AM3+ or FM2 sockets, but AM3+ remains the most reliable. For Intel, it's unclear when PCI was removed, but LGA1366 seems to be the last major version. Even with a PCI-E X1 to PCI adapter, you might face driver issues and incompatibility with Windows 10 or 11.

S
stopmo
Member
175
07-08-2019, 12:49 PM
#12
The built-in sound for any solid board usually performs better than your old sound card, and you probably won’t need any drivers for modern systems. I’d recommend using it in a vintage setup.
S
stopmo
07-08-2019, 12:49 PM #12

The built-in sound for any solid board usually performs better than your old sound card, and you probably won’t need any drivers for modern systems. I’d recommend using it in a vintage setup.

L
Lt_kilowatt
Junior Member
13
07-08-2019, 07:21 PM
#13
Modern audio tech doesn't always guarantee improvement.
L
Lt_kilowatt
07-08-2019, 07:21 PM #13

Modern audio tech doesn't always guarantee improvement.

D
Dylan2500725
Junior Member
18
07-15-2019, 04:24 AM
#14
I'll take a closer look.
D
Dylan2500725
07-15-2019, 04:24 AM #14

I'll take a closer look.

S
Seoulsib
Member
192
07-18-2019, 08:55 AM
#15
I followed the same steps for the same reasons, and the "Old" card sounds significantly better than the one I used across various boards and higher-end models. For instance, on AM3+ it's either a Crosshair V (Non Z) or a Sabertooth 2.0, which matches what I have now with my previous card. The specific card (Sound Blaster Live 24 bit / SB 0410) functions with Linux, unlike the Sound Blaster Z, which is why I went through the setup as it is. It delivers louder sound and superior audio quality, making it far better than anything I've experienced with onboard sound. Because of its Linux compatibility, I chose to take advantage of it and I'm glad I did.
S
Seoulsib
07-18-2019, 08:55 AM #15

I followed the same steps for the same reasons, and the "Old" card sounds significantly better than the one I used across various boards and higher-end models. For instance, on AM3+ it's either a Crosshair V (Non Z) or a Sabertooth 2.0, which matches what I have now with my previous card. The specific card (Sound Blaster Live 24 bit / SB 0410) functions with Linux, unlike the Sound Blaster Z, which is why I went through the setup as it is. It delivers louder sound and superior audio quality, making it far better than anything I've experienced with onboard sound. Because of its Linux compatibility, I chose to take advantage of it and I'm glad I did.

C
Caiomarmo
Junior Member
24
07-19-2019, 08:01 PM
#16
I didn't claim it was superior just because it was newer. I meant it would probably be better based on what I've seen. That's my take, honestly. Taste in audio is really personal.
C
Caiomarmo
07-19-2019, 08:01 PM #16

I didn't claim it was superior just because it was newer. I meant it would probably be better based on what I've seen. That's my take, honestly. Taste in audio is really personal.

K
Kyran_Tse
Junior Member
42
08-08-2019, 10:26 AM
#17
It really comes down to personal preference, but the quality of the equipment plays a big role. Using decent speakers or headphones can significantly improve the listening experience, even if you're using a low-quality source. While they won't be inexpensive, the difference is noticeable once you hear it—something I experienced firsthand.
K
Kyran_Tse
08-08-2019, 10:26 AM #17

It really comes down to personal preference, but the quality of the equipment plays a big role. Using decent speakers or headphones can significantly improve the listening experience, even if you're using a low-quality source. While they won't be inexpensive, the difference is noticeable once you hear it—something I experienced firsthand.

E
Emma3561
Member
52
08-08-2019, 06:59 PM
#18
PC-related issues often stem from missing drivers, but functionality isn't guaranteed just because an old card is used. It might offer improved sound, reduced latency, or better overall performance, yet without a working driver it won’t function. If you prefer a more reliable setup, consider a DAC instead of relying on your built-in sound. For better audio quality, invest in an external EQ and tube preamp—audio can be costly and complex. I’ve nearly reached the edge before, but with DJ headphones and a decent DAC, I managed to stay on track.
E
Emma3561
08-08-2019, 06:59 PM #18

PC-related issues often stem from missing drivers, but functionality isn't guaranteed just because an old card is used. It might offer improved sound, reduced latency, or better overall performance, yet without a working driver it won’t function. If you prefer a more reliable setup, consider a DAC instead of relying on your built-in sound. For better audio quality, invest in an external EQ and tube preamp—audio can be costly and complex. I’ve nearly reached the edge before, but with DJ headphones and a decent DAC, I managed to stay on track.

L
LilGhostz
Junior Member
27
08-08-2019, 08:10 PM
#19
B75, Q75 and Q77 were the final models supporting native PCI.
L
LilGhostz
08-08-2019, 08:10 PM #19

B75, Q75 and Q77 were the final models supporting native PCI.

N
nick20078
Member
68
08-13-2019, 12:44 PM
#20
I've discovered (likely) the final MBs that support PCI slot and CSM BIOS compatibility are the so-called "industrial" motherboards. These are probably the most capable, costly, and still maintain CSM mode, PCI slots, and even Win7x64SP1 functionality. They feature 2nd generation Scalable CPUs and include models such as:

- Advantech ASMB-925 (2x LGA3647, 1xPCI, no NVMe onboard; available at elmark-automation.com or ebay links)
- Avalue HPM-621DEA-A1R (2x LGA3647, NVMe + U2 slots, 1xPCI; available at bicker.de)
- A-HPM-621UA (1x LGA3647, 1xPCI)

If you're unsure about Win7x64SP1 compatibility on 2xLGA3647 boards, check the attached images from ebay. For those with LGA3647 that are still viable and demand high power, there are cheaper alternatives like LGA1200 or LGA1700 boards (e.g., ASMB-787G2, Asrock 1711/1711 ECC, Asus Q470EA, MSI MS-98K9-V2.1, MSI MS-98N9-W480e, Supermicro X11SCA).
N
nick20078
08-13-2019, 12:44 PM #20

I've discovered (likely) the final MBs that support PCI slot and CSM BIOS compatibility are the so-called "industrial" motherboards. These are probably the most capable, costly, and still maintain CSM mode, PCI slots, and even Win7x64SP1 functionality. They feature 2nd generation Scalable CPUs and include models such as:

- Advantech ASMB-925 (2x LGA3647, 1xPCI, no NVMe onboard; available at elmark-automation.com or ebay links)
- Avalue HPM-621DEA-A1R (2x LGA3647, NVMe + U2 slots, 1xPCI; available at bicker.de)
- A-HPM-621UA (1x LGA3647, 1xPCI)

If you're unsure about Win7x64SP1 compatibility on 2xLGA3647 boards, check the attached images from ebay. For those with LGA3647 that are still viable and demand high power, there are cheaper alternatives like LGA1200 or LGA1700 boards (e.g., ASMB-787G2, Asrock 1711/1711 ECC, Asus Q470EA, MSI MS-98K9-V2.1, MSI MS-98N9-W480e, Supermicro X11SCA).

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next