Crysis 3 is a solid choice for benchmarking due to its consistent performance and reliable results.
Crysis 3 is a solid choice for benchmarking due to its consistent performance and reliable results.
You might purchase a finished game just to compare performance against it. There are many other options available, and some titles even let you test your hardware. Plus, Crysis 3 is outdated for benchmarks, while games like The Witcher 3, Grand Theft Auto V, and Metro: Last Light remain current.
Crysis 3, despite its advanced graphics, has become largely out of date today.
Despite launching near the same time as Crysis 3, Tomb Raider and B4 remain standards for comparison.
It was launched on the latest consoles and PC just a month after Crysis 3. I still can't understand why it's considered better in benchmarks, especially because it's less challenging and feels like an outlier, with results that don't follow a clear trend.
It's a decent benchmark game but that the same time, any modern triple-A title is a benchmark these days. Hell, I don't even play triple-A titles for gameplay, I just test it and move on. A lot of the titles aren't even that good to begin with to me, so yeah. Just to rant on the subject of benchmarking on games, I hate the fact that games like Witcher 3 take so damn long to actually get into the gameplay. Even Far Cry 4 makes you wait like 20 minutes till you can actually play the damn game... It pisses me off when I'm trying to test a games performance.