F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Creating a workstation among multiple computers

Creating a workstation among multiple computers

Creating a workstation among multiple computers

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
M
memee56200
Member
212
03-03-2016, 07:54 PM
#1
Hey Guys, Me and my flatmates doing some graphics designo and we decided to establish as best workflow for us as it possible (we're also runing weekend operating full time LANparty hardcore gaming). I was thinking maybe some of you guys have some tips on enhencing connection between computers. Right now we've established workgroup, and shared drives with each other. Is there any thing that comes to your mind guys and could do something more? We don't have any server for now, but we thinking about buying one. BTW. Here's a photo of ouer "facilo" druing weekend lanparty, hope you like it!
M
memee56200
03-03-2016, 07:54 PM #1

Hey Guys, Me and my flatmates doing some graphics designo and we decided to establish as best workflow for us as it possible (we're also runing weekend operating full time LANparty hardcore gaming). I was thinking maybe some of you guys have some tips on enhencing connection between computers. Right now we've established workgroup, and shared drives with each other. Is there any thing that comes to your mind guys and could do something more? We don't have any server for now, but we thinking about buying one. BTW. Here's a photo of ouer "facilo" druing weekend lanparty, hope you like it!

C
CaptainFrix
Member
213
03-03-2016, 08:55 PM
#2
It seems like your equipment is in a really bad shape. It looks like something was thrown at it through a mosquito net.
C
CaptainFrix
03-03-2016, 08:55 PM #2

It seems like your equipment is in a really bad shape. It looks like something was thrown at it through a mosquito net.

D
DaLeon98
Junior Member
9
03-03-2016, 10:46 PM
#3
You're likely referring to a connection speed of 10 Gigabits per second, also known as 10 Gbps, which mathematically translates to about 1.25 GBps. It seems their internal storage might struggle to handle such rapid read/write operations. @MikeZPro: A 10 Gbps link between your workstations would boost transfer rates, but you might want to consider moving media files elsewhere. Used servers from eBay could be a solution—they often come with fast SAS drives and multiple 10Gbps ports. Upgrading would likely cost a few hundred dollars, though probably under $1,000 if you purchase directly. Regarding the switch, since you're managing more than two computers and a standard 10GbE port only supports two connections (the cheaper ones), finding one that fits could be challenging. A better option might be equipping all workstations with a quad-nic (like Intel Quad Gigabit NICs, 40-70Gbps) and using a switch that supports LACP. I found one on eBay for around $200-$250; it has multiple gigabit ports and should handle the load. Once you have the server connected via a 10Gbps link to the switch, each workstation would theoretically reach up to 4Gbps.
D
DaLeon98
03-03-2016, 10:46 PM #3

You're likely referring to a connection speed of 10 Gigabits per second, also known as 10 Gbps, which mathematically translates to about 1.25 GBps. It seems their internal storage might struggle to handle such rapid read/write operations. @MikeZPro: A 10 Gbps link between your workstations would boost transfer rates, but you might want to consider moving media files elsewhere. Used servers from eBay could be a solution—they often come with fast SAS drives and multiple 10Gbps ports. Upgrading would likely cost a few hundred dollars, though probably under $1,000 if you purchase directly. Regarding the switch, since you're managing more than two computers and a standard 10GbE port only supports two connections (the cheaper ones), finding one that fits could be challenging. A better option might be equipping all workstations with a quad-nic (like Intel Quad Gigabit NICs, 40-70Gbps) and using a switch that supports LACP. I found one on eBay for around $200-$250; it has multiple gigabit ports and should handle the load. Once you have the server connected via a 10Gbps link to the switch, each workstation would theoretically reach up to 4Gbps.

R
Roe56
Member
102
03-25-2016, 05:12 PM
#4
Again Bits versus Bytes: 10GBPS equals 80 Gbps, roughly twice the capacity Linus currently possesses in his upgraded NVMe storage system.
R
Roe56
03-25-2016, 05:12 PM #4

Again Bits versus Bytes: 10GBPS equals 80 Gbps, roughly twice the capacity Linus currently possesses in his upgraded NVMe storage system.

T
TehStratosHD
Senior Member
492
03-26-2016, 01:27 PM
#5
there are options to boost file transfers, though they may lack ease of use or compatibility with Windows. what if we added a dedicated mini-processor on every machine? this way, with three computers, you could install a quad NIC card in each and link them together.
T
TehStratosHD
03-26-2016, 01:27 PM #5

there are options to boost file transfers, though they may lack ease of use or compatibility with Windows. what if we added a dedicated mini-processor on every machine? this way, with three computers, you could install a quad NIC card in each and link them together.

T
tinodz
Member
218
03-26-2016, 10:02 PM
#6
Upper case B stands for bytes, lower case is bits. One gigabit equals 125 megabits per second (1000 divided by 8). In your previous two messages you kept referring to GigaBytes often. While A. all network speeds are usually expressed in xbits per second
T
tinodz
03-26-2016, 10:02 PM #6

Upper case B stands for bytes, lower case is bits. One gigabit equals 125 megabits per second (1000 divided by 8). In your previous two messages you kept referring to GigaBytes often. While A. all network speeds are usually expressed in xbits per second

L
lordCactus_03
Junior Member
20
04-12-2016, 09:37 PM
#7
Each computer would need two quad ports (to achieve a 4Gbps link between X and Y, Y and Z, and X and Z). You could technically use four quad port cards, but then the middle device with two would have to stay active constantly.
L
lordCactus_03
04-12-2016, 09:37 PM #7

Each computer would need two quad ports (to achieve a 4Gbps link between X and Y, Y and Z, and X and Z). You could technically use four quad port cards, but then the middle device with two would have to stay active constantly.

C
Ciera7
Member
225
04-14-2016, 07:33 PM
#8
What I meant was to have several NICs connected directly, ensuring no congestion on the router and preventing interference between specific pairs.
C
Ciera7
04-14-2016, 07:33 PM #8

What I meant was to have several NICs connected directly, ensuring no congestion on the router and preventing interference between specific pairs.

G
gman42601
Member
140
04-14-2016, 08:59 PM
#9
This setup involves multiple connections between PCs, with each device linked in a chain. Each computer appears twice in the list, connected to others in different parts of the network. The configuration suggests around two NICs per PC. It seems you might have intended higher-speed links—possibly 4Gbps instead of 2Gbps—and a design where only certain paths are active for communication.
G
gman42601
04-14-2016, 08:59 PM #9

This setup involves multiple connections between PCs, with each device linked in a chain. Each computer appears twice in the list, connected to others in different parts of the network. The configuration suggests around two NICs per PC. It seems you might have intended higher-speed links—possibly 4Gbps instead of 2Gbps—and a design where only certain paths are active for communication.

R
Rosie_The_Fox
Member
213
04-15-2016, 03:42 AM
#10
I don't believe my message is coming through clearly. The setup will require 3 NICs per PC, plus one extra for internet. X<->Y, X<->Z, Y<->Z, X->internet router, Y<->internet router, Z<->internet router. I’m not sure why you think Y needs to stay online; I think each device should have a NIC connected to the internet router.
R
Rosie_The_Fox
04-15-2016, 03:42 AM #10

I don't believe my message is coming through clearly. The setup will require 3 NICs per PC, plus one extra for internet. X<->Y, X<->Z, Y<->Z, X->internet router, Y<->internet router, Z<->internet router. I’m not sure why you think Y needs to stay online; I think each device should have a NIC connected to the internet router.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next