F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Create a dedicated network for IoT devices.

Create a dedicated network for IoT devices.

Create a dedicated network for IoT devices.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
L
liamlxe
Junior Member
38
02-07-2016, 04:30 PM
#11
That's correct, I overlooked that. It seems it adds extra security. I'm a newcomer, so I'd appreciate staying local instead of using the cloud. Are you referring to Kasa Smart Switches?
L
liamlxe
02-07-2016, 04:30 PM #11

That's correct, I overlooked that. It seems it adds extra security. I'm a newcomer, so I'd appreciate staying local instead of using the cloud. Are you referring to Kasa Smart Switches?

M
Markoswazzola
Junior Member
18
02-27-2016, 10:09 PM
#12
The issue here is clear—when you focus IoT devices solely on security, isolating them can create a false sense of protection. I've noticed some users setting up their devices in separate VLANs and using routers to break that isolation, enabling direct access between networks. This undermines the intended security because it reintroduces the same vulnerabilities they aimed to avoid. It also adds unnecessary complexity to your network setup without real benefits. My own IoT environment stays completely separate; I only interact with devices via the cloud, which is the only reliable method to keep them protected from internal threats.
M
Markoswazzola
02-27-2016, 10:09 PM #12

The issue here is clear—when you focus IoT devices solely on security, isolating them can create a false sense of protection. I've noticed some users setting up their devices in separate VLANs and using routers to break that isolation, enabling direct access between networks. This undermines the intended security because it reintroduces the same vulnerabilities they aimed to avoid. It also adds unnecessary complexity to your network setup without real benefits. My own IoT environment stays completely separate; I only interact with devices via the cloud, which is the only reliable method to keep them protected from internal threats.

S
Suriel02
Member
73
02-28-2016, 03:16 AM
#13
It really feels like extra work isn't worth much benefit. Appreciate everything you did!
S
Suriel02
02-28-2016, 03:16 AM #13

It really feels like extra work isn't worth much benefit. Appreciate everything you did!

L
lilycotterill
Senior Member
656
03-03-2016, 04:49 AM
#14
IoT operates on its own dedicated VLAN, completely isolated from your private networks. Access to the IoT segment comes only from private subnets, while the reverse isn’t possible; no IoT traffic can reach those areas. I placed my home assistant inside the IoT subnet because that’s the most reliable setup. I’m not overly concerned about a smart switch compromising hardware availability—its attack surface is limited, and even if breached, control would be restricted to local devices. I have some exceptions for HA communication with private subnets, but those are isolated to specific systems only. Plex servers reside in my home lab subnet, and NVIDIA Shield is an IoT device on the same network. Overall, it remains secure yet fully functional under local-only constraints.
L
lilycotterill
03-03-2016, 04:49 AM #14

IoT operates on its own dedicated VLAN, completely isolated from your private networks. Access to the IoT segment comes only from private subnets, while the reverse isn’t possible; no IoT traffic can reach those areas. I placed my home assistant inside the IoT subnet because that’s the most reliable setup. I’m not overly concerned about a smart switch compromising hardware availability—its attack surface is limited, and even if breached, control would be restricted to local devices. I have some exceptions for HA communication with private subnets, but those are isolated to specific systems only. Plex servers reside in my home lab subnet, and NVIDIA Shield is an IoT device on the same network. Overall, it remains secure yet fully functional under local-only constraints.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2