F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems CPU Choice for Linux (VM)

CPU Choice for Linux (VM)

CPU Choice for Linux (VM)

Z
Zentrela
Member
129
01-06-2020, 10:08 PM
#1
I’m beginning to try VM for both Windows and Linux (one at a time) to grasp how virtualization functions. (Using VirtualBox) Which processor should I choose? I recall hearing that Intel is often preferred over AMD for virtualization. Has this shifted after Zen3? I know Nvidia GPUs might face driver issues on Linux, so I’m wary of opting for an AMD CPU without a built-in GPU. Are there other factors to consider? As a newcomer to Linux, I want to minimize early challenges. P.S. The VM must stay active as long as the physical PC is running, so it needs to share resources continuously.
Z
Zentrela
01-06-2020, 10:08 PM #1

I’m beginning to try VM for both Windows and Linux (one at a time) to grasp how virtualization functions. (Using VirtualBox) Which processor should I choose? I recall hearing that Intel is often preferred over AMD for virtualization. Has this shifted after Zen3? I know Nvidia GPUs might face driver issues on Linux, so I’m wary of opting for an AMD CPU without a built-in GPU. Are there other factors to consider? As a newcomer to Linux, I want to minimize early challenges. P.S. The VM must stay active as long as the physical PC is running, so it needs to share resources continuously.

M
MiniZipline
Junior Member
43
01-07-2020, 06:47 AM
#2
budget?
M
MiniZipline
01-07-2020, 06:47 AM #2

budget?

P
PvtStoner
Senior Member
599
01-07-2020, 02:39 PM
#3
I can't say there's an overwhelming reason to go either direction. From my experience on Threadripper AMD-V works just as well as Intel's VT-x at least when it comes to using QEMU/KVM as a virtualizer with hardware pass-through. I guess I'd go with whichever brand suits your other needs better.
P
PvtStoner
01-07-2020, 02:39 PM #3

I can't say there's an overwhelming reason to go either direction. From my experience on Threadripper AMD-V works just as well as Intel's VT-x at least when it comes to using QEMU/KVM as a virtualizer with hardware pass-through. I guess I'd go with whichever brand suits your other needs better.

T
ThimoDoesMC
Junior Member
4
01-07-2020, 10:03 PM
#4
Costs near $500 for the processor alone.
T
ThimoDoesMC
01-07-2020, 10:03 PM #4

Costs near $500 for the processor alone.

O
Okeinshield
Senior Member
595
01-11-2020, 10:24 AM
#5
You're weighing 5800x and 10850K options. The 5800x with the motherboard will be $50 more, while 8-core models offer better single-core performance compared to 12-core.
O
Okeinshield
01-11-2020, 10:24 AM #5

You're weighing 5800x and 10850K options. The 5800x with the motherboard will be $50 more, while 8-core models offer better single-core performance compared to 12-core.

T
twinkies1108
Member
51
01-13-2020, 12:25 AM
#6
For VMs, the top choice is the 5900x offering, providing double the cores for half the price. While it may seem costly, it delivers the best performance per core.
T
twinkies1108
01-13-2020, 12:25 AM #6

For VMs, the top choice is the 5900x offering, providing double the cores for half the price. While it may seem costly, it delivers the best performance per core.

R
reidlr
Member
67
01-13-2020, 12:45 AM
#7
I’m looking at a 10850k for $350 right now, but I can’t match that for the 5900x due to availability issues. Would you prefer 5800x or go with 10850k?
R
reidlr
01-13-2020, 12:45 AM #7

I’m looking at a 10850k for $350 right now, but I can’t match that for the 5900x due to availability issues. Would you prefer 5800x or go with 10850k?

L
Lordlochie
Member
214
01-13-2020, 09:24 AM
#8
It depends on the level of parallelism in your virtualized tasks. Generally, 12 cores can beat 8 unless you push the 8-core to its limits. If you mainly run one VM at a time or aim for gaming in a single VM, a lower core count with higher clock speeds might work better. For handling multiple VMs simultaneously, prioritize more cores over faster ones. When you need to stress several VMs together, consider boosting a 12-core setup.
L
Lordlochie
01-13-2020, 09:24 AM #8

It depends on the level of parallelism in your virtualized tasks. Generally, 12 cores can beat 8 unless you push the 8-core to its limits. If you mainly run one VM at a time or aim for gaming in a single VM, a lower core count with higher clock speeds might work better. For handling multiple VMs simultaneously, prioritize more cores over faster ones. When you need to stress several VMs together, consider boosting a 12-core setup.