F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Could switching to Linux be beneficial?

Could switching to Linux be beneficial?

Could switching to Linux be beneficial?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
S
Squidney916
Member
60
06-01-2021, 06:32 PM
#1
Linux might offer better performance for gaming compared to Windows. Considering your system specs—12600kf processor, 6600xt CPU, 32GB DDR4-3200 RAM, and SN770 GPU—it’s worth exploring the switch. Your current setup handles most games well, but a change could improve responsiveness and stability.
S
Squidney916
06-01-2021, 06:32 PM #1

Linux might offer better performance for gaming compared to Windows. Considering your system specs—12600kf processor, 6600xt CPU, 32GB DDR4-3200 RAM, and SN770 GPU—it’s worth exploring the switch. Your current setup handles most games well, but a change could improve responsiveness and stability.

D
DrUnKeN_TiGeR
Junior Member
36
06-15-2021, 05:56 PM
#2
Linux doesn't provide any advantages because of its problems. It's regrettably not the solution you were seeking.
D
DrUnKeN_TiGeR
06-15-2021, 05:56 PM #2

Linux doesn't provide any advantages because of its problems. It's regrettably not the solution you were seeking.

M
Morvaxx
Member
153
06-18-2021, 05:50 PM
#3
Gaming - As someone who relies on Linux as their main operating system for a long time, I often feel frustrated when trying to use Windows. Gaming isn't the best fit for Linux. I still keep a dual boot setup for gaming, using Linux for everything else. Although you can play games in Linux, it remains a challenging experience at times. You'll encounter issues that don't work or games that simply fail to function. While performance has improved, it's still more convenient to use Windows and avoid the hassle.
M
Morvaxx
06-18-2021, 05:50 PM #3

Gaming - As someone who relies on Linux as their main operating system for a long time, I often feel frustrated when trying to use Windows. Gaming isn't the best fit for Linux. I still keep a dual boot setup for gaming, using Linux for everything else. Although you can play games in Linux, it remains a challenging experience at times. You'll encounter issues that don't work or games that simply fail to function. While performance has improved, it's still more convenient to use Windows and avoid the hassle.

F
Frogimouse
Member
217
06-30-2021, 03:02 AM
#4
I work with both Windows and Linux. As others noted, if you encounter significant problems, it’s likely they don’t exist in Windows. However, I still face serious issues on Windows, so I switch to another OS whenever possible. Right now, I’m using Ubuntu on my desktop and Mint on my laptop, but the overall experience feels quite similar across popular distributions.
F
Frogimouse
06-30-2021, 03:02 AM #4

I work with both Windows and Linux. As others noted, if you encounter significant problems, it’s likely they don’t exist in Windows. However, I still face serious issues on Windows, so I switch to another OS whenever possible. Right now, I’m using Ubuntu on my desktop and Mint on my laptop, but the overall experience feels quite similar across popular distributions.

A
adrian4
Junior Member
3
06-30-2021, 03:44 AM
#5
In gaming terms, it doesn’t quite match Windows. Although Linux gaming has seen big improvements over the years, offering more freedom to start playing right away, it still falls short for many users. Generally, I’ve experienced solid performance, but often the first time a game launches it fails. Proton compatibility tends to work well with Proton Experimental or the newest versions, though some titles may need an older Proton build (check protondb for details). Occasionally, certain games won’t even start and require special command lines—though I’ve managed to get them running by consulting protondb. One common complaint is the lack of built-in game launchers; on Windows you can pick any launcher, but on Linux it’s usually limited to tools like Steamtinkerlaunch, which only supports Fling trainers. Running training programs is another issue—Windows lets you choose freely, while Linux requires workarounds. Performance-wise, Arch-based distros like EndeavourOS or Garuda Linux have given me the best results, especially for CoD and Destiny 2. Debian/Ubuntu systems are decent but slower, with updates taking months to reach them. Even Valve acknowledges this shift, noting that early SteamOS versions were based on Debian or Ubuntu before moving to Arch.
A
adrian4
06-30-2021, 03:44 AM #5

In gaming terms, it doesn’t quite match Windows. Although Linux gaming has seen big improvements over the years, offering more freedom to start playing right away, it still falls short for many users. Generally, I’ve experienced solid performance, but often the first time a game launches it fails. Proton compatibility tends to work well with Proton Experimental or the newest versions, though some titles may need an older Proton build (check protondb for details). Occasionally, certain games won’t even start and require special command lines—though I’ve managed to get them running by consulting protondb. One common complaint is the lack of built-in game launchers; on Windows you can pick any launcher, but on Linux it’s usually limited to tools like Steamtinkerlaunch, which only supports Fling trainers. Running training programs is another issue—Windows lets you choose freely, while Linux requires workarounds. Performance-wise, Arch-based distros like EndeavourOS or Garuda Linux have given me the best results, especially for CoD and Destiny 2. Debian/Ubuntu systems are decent but slower, with updates taking months to reach them. Even Valve acknowledges this shift, noting that early SteamOS versions were based on Debian or Ubuntu before moving to Arch.

X
66
07-01-2021, 05:15 PM
#6
I really enjoy Linux and have relied on it completely on all my computers for six months in a row, until recently. The moment I found the Ghost Spectre custom Windows 11 ISO, I installed it—this was the sole reason I’m open to using W11. Although I appreciate Linux, it felt outdated because I had to navigate many obstacles just to run games, whereas on Windows it’s as easy as pressing play. I still maintain Linux (Zorin OS) on my non-gaming machine and Fedora on another device. I plan to revert to Linux entirely eventually, but I’d like to wait a couple more years for it to mature. The only drawbacks I’ve experienced with Linux have always come from Ubuntu (and PopOS), though I’d prefer PopOS over Ubuntu. I’d favor Ubuntu-based systems like Mint or Zorin OS for non-gaming setups, Fedora for gaming PCs that rarely need updates yet still require solid performance and reliability, and EndeavourOS or Garuda Linux for daily gaming use.
X
xXDark__LordXx
07-01-2021, 05:15 PM #6

I really enjoy Linux and have relied on it completely on all my computers for six months in a row, until recently. The moment I found the Ghost Spectre custom Windows 11 ISO, I installed it—this was the sole reason I’m open to using W11. Although I appreciate Linux, it felt outdated because I had to navigate many obstacles just to run games, whereas on Windows it’s as easy as pressing play. I still maintain Linux (Zorin OS) on my non-gaming machine and Fedora on another device. I plan to revert to Linux entirely eventually, but I’d like to wait a couple more years for it to mature. The only drawbacks I’ve experienced with Linux have always come from Ubuntu (and PopOS), though I’d prefer PopOS over Ubuntu. I’d favor Ubuntu-based systems like Mint or Zorin OS for non-gaming setups, Fedora for gaming PCs that rarely need updates yet still require solid performance and reliability, and EndeavourOS or Garuda Linux for daily gaming use.

L
lilgameplay
Member
194
07-14-2021, 09:49 AM
#7
Linux has seen significant improvements in gaming performance, though it’s still developing. There remains a growing number of titles that run smoothly with Proton, while many others need adjustments or cause issues. Nvidia drivers have become less common, and some users have even created their own from scratch. These custom drivers function adequately for everyday play but struggle with gaming. Nvidia support is expanding as Linux gains traction, yet their drivers often lag behind Windows in performance and compatibility across distros and desktop managers. Anticheat tools typically don’t work well on Linux, making multiplayer play difficult and the experience less intuitive. For games that don’t run natively, you may need to manually tweak settings or configure WINE properly. It’s not ideal if your preferred titles perform well or support Proton, but hope remains for better future updates and developer commitment.
L
lilgameplay
07-14-2021, 09:49 AM #7

Linux has seen significant improvements in gaming performance, though it’s still developing. There remains a growing number of titles that run smoothly with Proton, while many others need adjustments or cause issues. Nvidia drivers have become less common, and some users have even created their own from scratch. These custom drivers function adequately for everyday play but struggle with gaming. Nvidia support is expanding as Linux gains traction, yet their drivers often lag behind Windows in performance and compatibility across distros and desktop managers. Anticheat tools typically don’t work well on Linux, making multiplayer play difficult and the experience less intuitive. For games that don’t run natively, you may need to manually tweak settings or configure WINE properly. It’s not ideal if your preferred titles perform well or support Proton, but hope remains for better future updates and developer commitment.

J
JZuli
Member
59
07-28-2021, 11:55 PM
#8
I find some of those points misleading. The main frustration with Nvidia drivers on Linux isn't that all distros include them by default. I've faced no issues with Arch-based systems, except for the simplest ones. I'm aware that Zorin OS will ask to install them if it detects Nvidia hardware. When they're not installed and you can't find a clear installation guide, searching online becomes tedious because each distro (Debian/Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch) has its own method. In terms of performance, I've experienced better results with Nvidia compared to AMD after installing them. The only real concern is that Wayland on KDE doesn't integrate well with Nvidia drivers yet—this should improve with the upcoming KDE 6 release. Regarding Anticheat, it's becoming less of a problem over time. For games like CoD, Destiny 2, and Rainbow Six Siege, most blockage is minimal now, though Fall Guys still had some issues (though a workaround exists). Overall, I believe it's manageable, but patience is required for those who prefer a smoother setup.
J
JZuli
07-28-2021, 11:55 PM #8

I find some of those points misleading. The main frustration with Nvidia drivers on Linux isn't that all distros include them by default. I've faced no issues with Arch-based systems, except for the simplest ones. I'm aware that Zorin OS will ask to install them if it detects Nvidia hardware. When they're not installed and you can't find a clear installation guide, searching online becomes tedious because each distro (Debian/Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch) has its own method. In terms of performance, I've experienced better results with Nvidia compared to AMD after installing them. The only real concern is that Wayland on KDE doesn't integrate well with Nvidia drivers yet—this should improve with the upcoming KDE 6 release. Regarding Anticheat, it's becoming less of a problem over time. For games like CoD, Destiny 2, and Rainbow Six Siege, most blockage is minimal now, though Fall Guys still had some issues (though a workaround exists). Overall, I believe it's manageable, but patience is required for those who prefer a smoother setup.

K
Koenisbaas123
Junior Member
15
07-29-2021, 01:14 AM
#9
Having relied solely on Linux since 2019, I’ve noticed significant progress. Many interfaces behave similarly to Windows, though performance tends to lag slightly. Anti-Cheat remains a persistent issue, preventing games like Rocket League and Fortnite from functioning properly. Native Linux versions such as KSP usually run better but often receive less attention for improvements or bug fixes—like the inability to use the alt key in KSP for copying subassemblies. You’ll also encounter odd bugs that may not be fixable, and Timber worked well until the latest update, after which it stopped running smoothly. If you’re willing to explore, a boot in dual boot could help you test things out.
K
Koenisbaas123
07-29-2021, 01:14 AM #9

Having relied solely on Linux since 2019, I’ve noticed significant progress. Many interfaces behave similarly to Windows, though performance tends to lag slightly. Anti-Cheat remains a persistent issue, preventing games like Rocket League and Fortnite from functioning properly. Native Linux versions such as KSP usually run better but often receive less attention for improvements or bug fixes—like the inability to use the alt key in KSP for copying subassemblies. You’ll also encounter odd bugs that may not be fixable, and Timber worked well until the latest update, after which it stopped running smoothly. If you’re willing to explore, a boot in dual boot could help you test things out.

A
Arzuzizu
Member
152
07-29-2021, 04:17 AM
#10
i'm not a gamer, and except for the rare "need to test this on windows" then i switch to vmware (windows performs better, is more stable in a virtual environment than directly on hardware), but i find it fascinating to try running windows games and software on linux. for some titles they actually work better, load quicker, others run almost the same, most just barely, which isn't really noticeable to me. a few don't even launch at all—software often said not to work in linux that actually does function with wine, including photoshop, all adobe products, microsoft office 2003 through 2021, and i haven't tested outlook 365 yet but heard it works too. bandicam, visual studio, chocolatey, sonic vesper, ableton live, cubase, plus many vsts. regarding games, i've played and run smoothly (and smoothly) on wargames, gta5 online, red dead redemption 2, unreal tournament 4, counter strike, and even cs:go pro. if you're a competitive player, i'd suggest switching to linux, using a fast filesystem like f2fs on an nvme drive, and running steam with minimal latency—potentially smoother input than what windows offers, especially with a fully preemptive kernel. and audio latency could drop well below what you get even with asio in windows (windows uses a 512 sample buffer at 44.1kHz which causes about 12ms latency; linux can hit around 8 samples for less than 0.175ms).
A
Arzuzizu
07-29-2021, 04:17 AM #10

i'm not a gamer, and except for the rare "need to test this on windows" then i switch to vmware (windows performs better, is more stable in a virtual environment than directly on hardware), but i find it fascinating to try running windows games and software on linux. for some titles they actually work better, load quicker, others run almost the same, most just barely, which isn't really noticeable to me. a few don't even launch at all—software often said not to work in linux that actually does function with wine, including photoshop, all adobe products, microsoft office 2003 through 2021, and i haven't tested outlook 365 yet but heard it works too. bandicam, visual studio, chocolatey, sonic vesper, ableton live, cubase, plus many vsts. regarding games, i've played and run smoothly (and smoothly) on wargames, gta5 online, red dead redemption 2, unreal tournament 4, counter strike, and even cs:go pro. if you're a competitive player, i'd suggest switching to linux, using a fast filesystem like f2fs on an nvme drive, and running steam with minimal latency—potentially smoother input than what windows offers, especially with a fully preemptive kernel. and audio latency could drop well below what you get even with asio in windows (windows uses a 512 sample buffer at 44.1kHz which causes about 12ms latency; linux can hit around 8 samples for less than 0.175ms).

Pages (2): 1 2 Next