F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking could boosting the memory speed past 2133mhz benefit the chip?

could boosting the memory speed past 2133mhz benefit the chip?

could boosting the memory speed past 2133mhz benefit the chip?

C
COLIN20052012
Posting Freak
857
03-16-2023, 07:59 PM
#1
check the intel site for skylake processors with memory types capped at 2133mhz. if you try to overclock the memory speed and your motherboard can handle it, compatibility depends on the specific model.
C
COLIN20052012
03-16-2023, 07:59 PM #1

check the intel site for skylake processors with memory types capped at 2133mhz. if you try to overclock the memory speed and your motherboard can handle it, compatibility depends on the specific model.

X
xMC_AMBERx
Junior Member
25
03-18-2023, 06:45 AM
#2
vikyy17 :
wildfire707 :
Intel lists DDR4 2133 as the officially approved memory rate. Many motherboard makers offer much faster options. I usually stick to standard voltages because DDR4 modules up to 2666mhz are readily available. It’s accurate that both the board and processor need to handle higher speeds, but for Skylake this isn’t a big issue (no major updates or problematic CPUs yet).
The reason only 2133mhz is mentioned on Intel’s site instead of higher rates like 2400mhz or more is straightforward—it reflects the officially supported limit rather than a restriction. Intel simply confirms what they can support.
X
xMC_AMBERx
03-18-2023, 06:45 AM #2

vikyy17 :
wildfire707 :
Intel lists DDR4 2133 as the officially approved memory rate. Many motherboard makers offer much faster options. I usually stick to standard voltages because DDR4 modules up to 2666mhz are readily available. It’s accurate that both the board and processor need to handle higher speeds, but for Skylake this isn’t a big issue (no major updates or problematic CPUs yet).
The reason only 2133mhz is mentioned on Intel’s site instead of higher rates like 2400mhz or more is straightforward—it reflects the officially supported limit rather than a restriction. Intel simply confirms what they can support.

C
CakeSFD
Member
226
03-18-2023, 07:46 AM
#3
if the mobo supports it, it will operate at a higher frequency.
C
CakeSFD
03-18-2023, 07:46 AM #3

if the mobo supports it, it will operate at a higher frequency.

D
DSG_Flynx
Junior Member
44
03-23-2023, 06:02 AM
#4
DDR4 2133 is Intel's officially recognized maximum memory speed. Several motherboard makers offer much faster rates. I usually avoid boosting voltage to keep things simple. With DDR4, you can easily find chips up to DDR4 2666. It’s accurate that both the board and the CPU need to support these higher rates, but for Skylake this isn’t a big issue (no major updates or problematic CPUs have been announced yet).
D
DSG_Flynx
03-23-2023, 06:02 AM #4

DDR4 2133 is Intel's officially recognized maximum memory speed. Several motherboard makers offer much faster rates. I usually avoid boosting voltage to keep things simple. With DDR4, you can easily find chips up to DDR4 2666. It’s accurate that both the board and the CPU need to support these higher rates, but for Skylake this isn’t a big issue (no major updates or problematic CPUs have been announced yet).

J
jjsoini
Posting Freak
809
03-23-2023, 12:06 PM
#5
The official Intel documentation lists DDR4 2133 as the maximum supported speed, while many motherboards accommodate much faster rates. I usually avoid boosting voltage to keep things stable. For DDR4 models up to 2666mhz, suitable options are readily available. It's accurate that both the motherboard and processor need to handle higher frequencies, but for Skylake it doesn't pose a major issue (no recent problematic updates). The reason for mentioning only 2133mhz on Intel's site is likely due to current standards and stability considerations.
J
jjsoini
03-23-2023, 12:06 PM #5

The official Intel documentation lists DDR4 2133 as the maximum supported speed, while many motherboards accommodate much faster rates. I usually avoid boosting voltage to keep things stable. For DDR4 models up to 2666mhz, suitable options are readily available. It's accurate that both the motherboard and processor need to handle higher frequencies, but for Skylake it doesn't pose a major issue (no recent problematic updates). The reason for mentioning only 2133mhz on Intel's site is likely due to current standards and stability considerations.

H
Hatefulness
Member
145
03-27-2023, 03:25 AM
#6
vikyy17 :
wildfire707 :
Intel officially lists DDR4 2133 as the maximum supported speed. Many motherboards can handle much higher rates, but I usually keep my settings stable without boosting voltage. This allows easy access to modules that support up to DDR4 2666. It’s accurate that both the board and processor need to match these frequencies, especially for Skylake models—no major issues have arisen recently. The reason only 2133mhz is mentioned isn’t because of technical limits, but because it’s the guaranteed minimum. Intel ensures Skylake CPUs will work with DDR4 2133 if supported. If a faster option exists, the motherboard and chip must back it up, and even then Intel accepts it as long as it functions. There’s a helpful article about the Skylake i7-6700 on Intel’s site: https://communities.intel.com/thread/884...0&tstart=0
H
Hatefulness
03-27-2023, 03:25 AM #6

vikyy17 :
wildfire707 :
Intel officially lists DDR4 2133 as the maximum supported speed. Many motherboards can handle much higher rates, but I usually keep my settings stable without boosting voltage. This allows easy access to modules that support up to DDR4 2666. It’s accurate that both the board and processor need to match these frequencies, especially for Skylake models—no major issues have arisen recently. The reason only 2133mhz is mentioned isn’t because of technical limits, but because it’s the guaranteed minimum. Intel ensures Skylake CPUs will work with DDR4 2133 if supported. If a faster option exists, the motherboard and chip must back it up, and even then Intel accepts it as long as it functions. There’s a helpful article about the Skylake i7-6700 on Intel’s site: https://communities.intel.com/thread/884...0&tstart=0