F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Could an upgrade to the CPU make a difference, or should you consider improving your whole system?

Could an upgrade to the CPU make a difference, or should you consider improving your whole system?

Could an upgrade to the CPU make a difference, or should you consider improving your whole system?

B
Boojazz
Member
Find
145
10-15-2016, 02:40 AM
#1
My setup has been in use for over five years now, and I've kept improving it as parts stop working. Now I'm facing a lot of CPU strain, especially since I'm stuck at stock speeds on my FX-6300. I've been using it at 3.5 GHz, but that's causing issues with stability, even though I might be responsible for some problems. These CPUs are quite old, and there are newer features, better performance options, and a fresh MOBO and case that could make a big difference if I manage the upgrade myself. If I stick to my current rig, I've seen FX-8350 models priced between $80 and $120, which seems like a reasonable investment for an upgrade. However, I'm unsure if it will truly provide enough improvement for my needs. I mainly play COD Warzone at medium or low settings, with Chrome open or other apps running in the background, but sometimes I run into performance bottlenecks. Right now, my specs are: FX-6300 @ 3.5 GHz (cooled by Hyper 212), Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 RAM, GTX 1650, Corsair power supply, 250 GB SSD, and a 3 TB Seagate drive.
Reply
Reply
B
Boojazz
10-15-2016, 02:40 AM #1

My setup has been in use for over five years now, and I've kept improving it as parts stop working. Now I'm facing a lot of CPU strain, especially since I'm stuck at stock speeds on my FX-6300. I've been using it at 3.5 GHz, but that's causing issues with stability, even though I might be responsible for some problems. These CPUs are quite old, and there are newer features, better performance options, and a fresh MOBO and case that could make a big difference if I manage the upgrade myself. If I stick to my current rig, I've seen FX-8350 models priced between $80 and $120, which seems like a reasonable investment for an upgrade. However, I'm unsure if it will truly provide enough improvement for my needs. I mainly play COD Warzone at medium or low settings, with Chrome open or other apps running in the background, but sometimes I run into performance bottlenecks. Right now, my specs are: FX-6300 @ 3.5 GHz (cooled by Hyper 212), Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 RAM, GTX 1650, Corsair power supply, 250 GB SSD, and a 3 TB Seagate drive.

Reply
Reply
B
Beeny
Member
Find
201
10-17-2016, 06:09 AM
#2
Wait about a month and you'll have a 3300x, a b550, and 16GB of 3200MHz DDR4. Those FX chips won’t add value or significantly boost performance.
Reply
Reply
B
Beeny
10-17-2016, 06:09 AM #2

Wait about a month and you'll have a 3300x, a b550, and 16GB of 3200MHz DDR4. Those FX chips won’t add value or significantly boost performance.

Reply
Reply
W
wollywinky
Junior Member
Find
48
10-31-2016, 04:46 AM
#3
You don’t need a complete overhaul right now. A modest overclock of the 6300 could give you better performance without breaking the bank. Compared to past prices, investing in an 8350 seems costly, but with proper setup, you can reach around 3.9–4.0GHz across all cores without major voltage changes. Your current motherboard and cooler aren’t built for extreme speeds, but a bit of attention could improve stability. For less demanding tasks or everyday use, the stock 6300 should still work well—around 60 FPS and smooth browsing. If you run into issues, it might point to something else at play.
Reply
Reply
W
wollywinky
10-31-2016, 04:46 AM #3

You don’t need a complete overhaul right now. A modest overclock of the 6300 could give you better performance without breaking the bank. Compared to past prices, investing in an 8350 seems costly, but with proper setup, you can reach around 3.9–4.0GHz across all cores without major voltage changes. Your current motherboard and cooler aren’t built for extreme speeds, but a bit of attention could improve stability. For less demanding tasks or everyday use, the stock 6300 should still work well—around 60 FPS and smooth browsing. If you run into issues, it might point to something else at play.

Reply
Reply
C
coolman348
Member
Find
199
11-02-2016, 01:33 AM
#4
Thanks for the input. It seemed unclear which path would give the best performance, and the FX chips didn’t justify their price. I thought a 4.0 overclock was my goal for a while, but after my previous GPU failed and I used a subpar one for a month, I faced stability issues. Removing the overclock restored normal operation, and since then I’ve only had a day off at work to experiment safely without risking mistakes.
Reply
Reply
C
coolman348
11-02-2016, 01:33 AM #4

Thanks for the input. It seemed unclear which path would give the best performance, and the FX chips didn’t justify their price. I thought a 4.0 overclock was my goal for a while, but after my previous GPU failed and I used a subpar one for a month, I faced stability issues. Removing the overclock restored normal operation, and since then I’ve only had a day off at work to experiment safely without risking mistakes.

Reply
Reply
T
The_Batman654
Member
Find
66
11-02-2016, 09:48 AM
#5
With a superior motherboard it could make a difference, though it might not be ideal for running eight-core processors. Consider pushing the CPU to its limits and maximizing GPU configurations, while setting all CPU-heavy tasks in-game to low.
Reply
Reply
T
The_Batman654
11-02-2016, 09:48 AM #5

With a superior motherboard it could make a difference, though it might not be ideal for running eight-core processors. Consider pushing the CPU to its limits and maximizing GPU configurations, while setting all CPU-heavy tasks in-game to low.

Reply
Reply