F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Core i5 3550 OC

Core i5 3550 OC

Core i5 3550 OC

M
myrtoft
Member
54
08-18-2016, 05:07 PM
#1
Hello everyone. I own an ASUS Z77 V LX motherboard paired with a Core i5 3550 at 3.3 GHz stock. I previously optimized it to 4.0 using Turbo Boost Multiplier and adjusted the vcore by +0.08 offset, which worked well for a year. Recently, I considered an extreme overclock, but this setup isn’t ideal for such changes. I set the X41 multiplier and 103 bus speed, achieving a stable 4.3 GHz performance that suits me perfectly. However, I encountered frequent BSODs, which was quite bothersome. I then experimented with Vcore adjustments. Even with a 1.2 manual setting, the performance remained subpar, so I tried increasing the Vcore by 3 to 4 times until I reached +0.2 offset. This resulted in an idle Vcore of about 1.1 and a maximum of 1.448 during gaming or testing. I realize this CPU isn’t designed for heavy overclocking, and pushing the Vcore to +0.2 while only reaching 4.3 GHz feels unusual, especially since it’s only a +1Ghz increase from stock. The main concern is whether it’s acceptable to run such a high Vcore on this chip, given that it became stable at this level with no issues during an 8-hour Prime95 test and 89C only. Thanks for your help!
M
myrtoft
08-18-2016, 05:07 PM #1

Hello everyone. I own an ASUS Z77 V LX motherboard paired with a Core i5 3550 at 3.3 GHz stock. I previously optimized it to 4.0 using Turbo Boost Multiplier and adjusted the vcore by +0.08 offset, which worked well for a year. Recently, I considered an extreme overclock, but this setup isn’t ideal for such changes. I set the X41 multiplier and 103 bus speed, achieving a stable 4.3 GHz performance that suits me perfectly. However, I encountered frequent BSODs, which was quite bothersome. I then experimented with Vcore adjustments. Even with a 1.2 manual setting, the performance remained subpar, so I tried increasing the Vcore by 3 to 4 times until I reached +0.2 offset. This resulted in an idle Vcore of about 1.1 and a maximum of 1.448 during gaming or testing. I realize this CPU isn’t designed for heavy overclocking, and pushing the Vcore to +0.2 while only reaching 4.3 GHz feels unusual, especially since it’s only a +1Ghz increase from stock. The main concern is whether it’s acceptable to run such a high Vcore on this chip, given that it became stable at this level with no issues during an 8-hour Prime95 test and 89C only. Thanks for your help!

F
fiona12
Member
139
08-20-2016, 07:47 AM
#2
Intel sets the maximum voltage for Ivy Bridge at 1.5V, which is acceptable. But the 89C model runs quite hot—my usual guideline is to keep the CPU below 70°C, since too much heat can speed up its degradation. The high voltage requirement for overclocking probably stems from the chip being a 3550 instead of a 3570K; back then, it struggled with high clocks at low voltages and was categorized as a lower-end model.
F
fiona12
08-20-2016, 07:47 AM #2

Intel sets the maximum voltage for Ivy Bridge at 1.5V, which is acceptable. But the 89C model runs quite hot—my usual guideline is to keep the CPU below 70°C, since too much heat can speed up its degradation. The high voltage requirement for overclocking probably stems from the chip being a 3550 instead of a 3570K; back then, it struggled with high clocks at low voltages and was categorized as a lower-end model.

S
starfighter418
Junior Member
14
08-21-2016, 01:02 AM
#3
Intel sets the maximum voltage for Ivy Bridge at 1.5V, which is acceptable. But the 89C model runs quite hot—my standard is to avoid letting the CPU exceed 70°C, since too much heat will likely speed up its degradation. The high voltage requirement for overclocking probably stems from the same limitation as the 3550 versus 3570K; when it was made, low voltages couldn't achieve high clocks, so it was categorized as a lower-end chip.
S
starfighter418
08-21-2016, 01:02 AM #3

Intel sets the maximum voltage for Ivy Bridge at 1.5V, which is acceptable. But the 89C model runs quite hot—my standard is to avoid letting the CPU exceed 70°C, since too much heat will likely speed up its degradation. The high voltage requirement for overclocking probably stems from the same limitation as the 3550 versus 3570K; when it was made, low voltages couldn't achieve high clocks, so it was categorized as a lower-end chip.