Convert GPU benchmark to Pharonix format
Convert GPU benchmark to Pharonix format
I realized I should have structured that more clearly. If there was a CLI app with sensible command formatting, I wouldn’t have mined it. Regarding your question about the GUI, yes, UEngine appears straightforward enough. @Nayr438, you need to identify the other program you wish it runs with. Pharonix seems to function more like a database, consolidating benchmarking tools in one location instead of maintaining its own. If you’re unsure which program to use for each component, there’s no way to proceed effectively, especially since this is my first attempt at benchmarking. It’s mainly due to performance concerns from Minecraft with BSL shaders, and I’m not familiar with the tools. That’s why I can’t rely on Pharonix.
It mainly focuses on executing tests under fixed configurations and saving the outcomes in a database. You also have the option to evaluate these results side by side. For example, using the same graphics card and settings, I achieved an average of 21.1 FPS, surpassing the typical 19 FPS average. This performance is likely near the best you can get with userbenchmark.
It didn't perform the comparison properly. This might be suitable for a 1070, but keep in mind it ran at half speed while using the full memory clock (GDDR5X). The graphics clock was likely 1800 or higher, possibly due to OpenGL 4.0. We hope driver 430 gets updated soon, or consider adding a working version of 440 to the PPA.
Great to hear it worked for you! I’m not very familiar with the latest hardware specs or benchmark results, but I might run this test myself later so you can compare it with my RX470. Also, it seems the kernel you’re using is quite old—are you planning to upgrade? What drivers are you employing? Also, just in case, I usually run benchmarks on a standard preset like "extreme (HD)" for fair comparisons.
I just went over the previous message. Sorry I didn't tag it properly and posted it as you did. The Heavenly Ultra was limited to the resolution in the first screenshot, so I saved the ultra preset settings and switched the resolution to 1080p. That's why the second one says custom. Is 2000 okay? Regarding the Kournel, I'll reach out once a Unity Ubuntu version is released, then I'll update. For now, everything works fine, and the icons in Unity on 18+ look a bit plain, so I'd prefer not to use them.
I hadn't considered that before. I tested the benchmark on my less powerful machine just to see: 1340 points. That's impressive—so let's wait for the others and let them evaluate your results. I don't think I'm a strong reference point. Regarding the kernel, your method works fine; it's good that you stick with it. Just a note: the kernel doesn't affect your desktop environment.
I hadn't considered that before. I tested the benchmark on my less powerful machine just to see how it performed: I achieved 1340 points. That's impressive! So let's wait for others to evaluate your results. Regarding the kernel, I appreciate your method—just because it works doesn't mean it's the best. It runs smoothly without affecting your desktop setup.
I also found a public leaderboard for comparison: https://benchmark.unigine.com/leaderboards/. Searching by your graphics card will give you a clearer picture.
P.S. Sorry for the repeated post—hope that helps!
Most outcomes are tailored for Windows, so avoid direct comparisons. OpenBenchmark is a suitable alternative, though it lacks sufficient Unigine Heaven data. Unigine Superposition offers the most reliable matches. Align settings with one of the listed tests.