F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Considering liquid cooling for the i5 3570k

Considering liquid cooling for the i5 3570k

Considering liquid cooling for the i5 3570k

S
Streiyn
Posting Freak
768
08-13-2016, 03:11 PM
#1
I considered liquid cooling for my processor and wondered if it would be worthwhile. I have the 212 EVO, which is currently OC to 4.2GHz with temperatures around 65 degrees under full load. Could liquid cooling help me achieve even higher performance?
S
Streiyn
08-13-2016, 03:11 PM #1

I considered liquid cooling for my processor and wondered if it would be worthwhile. I have the 212 EVO, which is currently OC to 4.2GHz with temperatures around 65 degrees under full load. Could liquid cooling help me achieve even higher performance?

S
SuperMarioDXB
Member
243
08-21-2016, 03:10 PM
#2
When you mention liquid cooling, do you mean a sealed system or a water-based loop? High-end air cooling can still perform just as well or even better than most sealed coolers. Additionally, overclocking is usually more constrained by the capacity to increase clock speeds than by thermal limits.
S
SuperMarioDXB
08-21-2016, 03:10 PM #2

When you mention liquid cooling, do you mean a sealed system or a water-based loop? High-end air cooling can still perform just as well or even better than most sealed coolers. Additionally, overclocking is usually more constrained by the capacity to increase clock speeds than by thermal limits.

F
Fritztech
Member
218
08-27-2016, 10:58 AM
#3
It seems unlikely, 65C under full load is already quite satisfactory.
F
Fritztech
08-27-2016, 10:58 AM #3

It seems unlikely, 65C under full load is already quite satisfactory.

X
XHi_Im_AshX
Junior Member
4
08-28-2016, 05:19 PM
#4
Yes, it should be straightforward to achieve 4.6GHz using water. My friend is currently running at 4.6 on air.
X
XHi_Im_AshX
08-28-2016, 05:19 PM #4

Yes, it should be straightforward to achieve 4.6GHz using water. My friend is currently running at 4.6 on air.

O
okA_
Member
141
08-28-2016, 08:33 PM
#5
When you mention liquid cooling, do you mean a sealed system or a water-based loop? High-end air cooling can still perform just as well or even better than most sealed coolers. Additionally, overclocking is usually more constrained by the capacity to increase clock speeds than by thermal limits.
O
okA_
08-28-2016, 08:33 PM #5

When you mention liquid cooling, do you mean a sealed system or a water-based loop? High-end air cooling can still perform just as well or even better than most sealed coolers. Additionally, overclocking is usually more constrained by the capacity to increase clock speeds than by thermal limits.

R
Rezay27
Junior Member
28
09-05-2016, 02:51 PM
#6
I was considering liquid cooling for my processor and wanted to know if it would be worthwhile. I have the 212 EVO and it's currently running at 4.2GHz with temperatures around 65 degrees under full load. Will it be possible to push it even higher with liquid cooling? Your temperatures are already quite good—what voltage are you using? I think you could reach around 4.3 tops with a better cooler, unless you still have significant voltage headroom.
R
Rezay27
09-05-2016, 02:51 PM #6

I was considering liquid cooling for my processor and wanted to know if it would be worthwhile. I have the 212 EVO and it's currently running at 4.2GHz with temperatures around 65 degrees under full load. Will it be possible to push it even higher with liquid cooling? Your temperatures are already quite good—what voltage are you using? I think you could reach around 4.3 tops with a better cooler, unless you still have significant voltage headroom.