F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Consider your needs and coverage; 5GHz offers faster speeds but shorter range.

Consider your needs and coverage; 5GHz offers faster speeds but shorter range.

Consider your needs and coverage; 5GHz offers faster speeds but shorter range.

8
8D_Playz_
Junior Member
49
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM
#1
You have a 100 Mbit connection but noticeably slower Wi-Fi performance. You're considering switching bands and face some obstacles with your current setup. It might help to explore other options or troubleshoot your router settings further.
8
8D_Playz_
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM #1

You have a 100 Mbit connection but noticeably slower Wi-Fi performance. You're considering switching bands and face some obstacles with your current setup. It might help to explore other options or troubleshoot your router settings further.

K
KlayDog1
Senior Member
685
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM
#2
Sure, you can test it right now. Are there any issues with your router or access point? What IP address are you connected to?
K
KlayDog1
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM #2

Sure, you can test it right now. Are there any issues with your router or access point? What IP address are you connected to?

S
SkyCrowzK
Member
189
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM
#3
What router type are you using? While 2.4GHz offers better wall penetration, its interference can affect reliability. 5GHz has potential but may require a newer device or a mesh network setup.
S
SkyCrowzK
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM #3

What router type are you using? While 2.4GHz offers better wall penetration, its interference can affect reliability. 5GHz has potential but may require a newer device or a mesh network setup.

Z
zebra_king
Junior Member
11
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM
#4
I've faced some issues with 802.11ac mesh networks. Even with the latest version, speeds stayed around 90Mbit even through gateways, while my old Asus 802.11ac router struggled to maintain them. I suggest using a 5GHz band and a solid router that supports at least 802.11ac.
Z
zebra_king
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM #4

I've faced some issues with 802.11ac mesh networks. Even with the latest version, speeds stayed around 90Mbit even through gateways, while my old Asus 802.11ac router struggled to maintain them. I suggest using a 5GHz band and a solid router that supports at least 802.11ac.

S
SrJugueira
Member
67
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM
#5
I own the Linksys Velop MX4200. It's a Wi-Fi 6 setup, performs well. The signal reach is average, but using two devices together gives solid coverage and the units come with many features.
S
SrJugueira
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM #5

I own the Linksys Velop MX4200. It's a Wi-Fi 6 setup, performs well. The signal reach is average, but using two devices together gives solid coverage and the units come with many features.

D
DarkStains
Member
149
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM
#6
I received coverage but not fast speeds. How do your speed tests perform? At my townhome, which is tall yet compact, I use one Ubiquiti U6 Enterprise (WiFi 6E) access point. I fully utilize the 1Gbit link on the 6GHz band, but it functions as a single access point rather than a mesh network. This setup offers another alternative. Would you consider a high-end router instead of a mesh system? It could be more cost-effective while still delivering strong performance. I previously used two different Openmesh 802.11ac mesh systems at my parents' place, but they delivered poor throughput and unreliable repeater uptime (just two gateways and one repeater). The newer A60 access points reached up to 90Mbit, typically in the 80s, whereas older AC1750 models maxed out around 60Mbit. After these disappointing experiences with multiple generations of hardware, I now doubt mesh solutions.
D
DarkStains
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM #6

I received coverage but not fast speeds. How do your speed tests perform? At my townhome, which is tall yet compact, I use one Ubiquiti U6 Enterprise (WiFi 6E) access point. I fully utilize the 1Gbit link on the 6GHz band, but it functions as a single access point rather than a mesh network. This setup offers another alternative. Would you consider a high-end router instead of a mesh system? It could be more cost-effective while still delivering strong performance. I previously used two different Openmesh 802.11ac mesh systems at my parents' place, but they delivered poor throughput and unreliable repeater uptime (just two gateways and one repeater). The newer A60 access points reached up to 90Mbit, typically in the 80s, whereas older AC1750 models maxed out around 60Mbit. After these disappointing experiences with multiple generations of hardware, I now doubt mesh solutions.

S
Sussu
Senior Member
708
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM
#7
I have the central hub set up on the second level in a storage area where the fiber link enters and my home server resides. It receives the complete 500/500 bandwidth across the entire floor. The unit below is at the end of the living room. It links back to the main node through a wireless extension. It serves the guest bathroom, a compact workspace, the backyard, and a small part of the front garden. That point usually drops to about 300/300 outside its coverage area. The Wi-Fi 6 and 6E mesh networks, especially tri-band devices, perform exceptionally well. My own setup and similar tri-band models typically use either 2.4/5/5 GHz or 2.4/5/6 GHz radios (Wi-Fi 6) or 2.4/5/6 GHz radios (Wi-Fi 6E). When using wireless backhaul, either the 5GHz or 6GHz spectrum will be fully dedicated to the mesh network.
S
Sussu
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM #7

I have the central hub set up on the second level in a storage area where the fiber link enters and my home server resides. It receives the complete 500/500 bandwidth across the entire floor. The unit below is at the end of the living room. It links back to the main node through a wireless extension. It serves the guest bathroom, a compact workspace, the backyard, and a small part of the front garden. That point usually drops to about 300/300 outside its coverage area. The Wi-Fi 6 and 6E mesh networks, especially tri-band devices, perform exceptionally well. My own setup and similar tri-band models typically use either 2.4/5/5 GHz or 2.4/5/6 GHz radios (Wi-Fi 6) or 2.4/5/6 GHz radios (Wi-Fi 6E). When using wireless backhaul, either the 5GHz or 6GHz spectrum will be fully dedicated to the mesh network.

S
SrTito87
Junior Member
32
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM
#8
The return trip seems to offer some intriguing aspects. However, it comes with a significant cost.
S
SrTito87
06-10-2025, 03:43 AM #8

The return trip seems to offer some intriguing aspects. However, it comes with a significant cost.