Consider your needs and choose wisely!
Consider your needs and choose wisely!
I plan to purchase one of the routers mentioned here. I won’t use it as a router, but I’ll set it up as an access point. The reason I avoid getting just an access point is that routers are affordable, and I need multiple LAN ports. I’ll connect my desktop, PS3, and PS4 to the new router using cables. This router will be installed on the first floor so devices on the first floor enjoy strong wireless coverage. My current internet speed is 120/120 Mbps, and I’m considering upgrading to 300/300 Mbps. I’m not sure what features to prioritize when choosing a router. Both 2.4GHz and 5GHz should function simultaneously. My laptop only supports 2.4GHz, while my phone and tablet work with 5GHz. A solid wireless connection is fine, and I need a decent processor in the device.
From what I see in the prices, routers are more affordable than switches and access points. I’d prefer to buy just a router so everything stays together. I don’t require a strong wireless connection. The house isn’t very large, and there’s no concrete around. The router will be installed on the first floor, and only my phone, tablet, and laptop will connect to it, which is also on the first floor.
A gigabit switch is available for roughly €20, while a solid access point costs similarly to a good router and tends to deliver better performance in actual conditions, not just behind walls.
Choose the most affordable option. I wouldn't suggest any of them, but you'll avoid spending a lot.
Norway isn't that affordable, and I prefer buying locally. You can find the prices for AP here, and the switches too. The costs are shown in NOK (8.64 NOK per USD). I’m okay with just getting a router; it looks more budget-friendly and works well for me. I received a Dlink 868L on the second floor, which I’m satisfied with, but I’m just asking what routers from your list would you suggest.
What determines a router’s quality depends on its features and performance. A bad router often lacks stability, has slow speeds, or poor security, while a good one offers reliability, strong connectivity, and solid protection. These issues can arise from outdated hardware, weak encryption, or inadequate support. If you’re considering upgrading, look for models with solid build quality, modern Wi-Fi standards, and good customer service. A mid-range option usually strikes the best balance between cost and performance.
I wouldn't suggest the Archer C7 or any model from that line; their processors aren't strong enough for 802.11ac. Keep in mind that even a simple barrier can significantly cut performance. On my C7 I have about 400Mbit of direct signal, but it drops to 300Mbit just because a wooden door blocks the path. That's why choosing an access point capable of handling much higher speeds is crucial, since actual usage will likely lower the rate. This explains why they talk about access points—WiFi routers usually handle this as an afterthought, and their chips often fall short. When you purchase a dedicated access point, if it doesn't meet expectations, it's a clear sign it won't work properly and should be returned easily.
They often struggle with data transfer speeds between wide area networks and local areas. Even with high-speed LAN connections, performance tends to drop significantly on budget home routers. Limited range is another common issue on cheaper devices. Inefficient hardware and insufficient memory can hinder the router’s ability to manage network traffic. Upgrading to better components unlocks access to advanced firmware options like DD-WRT or open WRT. Higher-end models also support a broader range of standards, offering more bands, greater bandwidth, and newer technologies. This makes them some of the most balanced performance-to-price options available today. https://www.prisjakt.no/product.php?p=3321565. Their main model is the WRT3200ACM.