F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Consider what needs improvement and prioritize the upgrades accordingly.

Consider what needs improvement and prioritize the upgrades accordingly.

Consider what needs improvement and prioritize the upgrades accordingly.

C
CaptainFrix
Member
213
06-03-2016, 05:38 AM
#1
I've just placed my first 144Hz monitor and am excited, but in certain games I struggle to hit close to 144fps. It might be a bottleneck issue or something else. Here are the details: CPU - Intel Xeon E3-1230 3.2GHz with 16GB RAM (8 usable, needs fixing or new RAM). GPU - MSI GTX 1060 with 6GB RAM and a couple of HDDs, no SSD RAID. I'm unsure if some games are more demanding on the CPU or GPU. Estimated average FPS for each game: Fortnite 150-200, CSGO 100-200 (hard to pin down), R6S 90-110, Apex Legends 80-100, GTA V 70-90 (can drop to 50), COD MW 80-110. Also, a quick question: if I keep seeing low FPS on a high refresh monitor, does it actually act as a real-time refresh monitor? Are there any downsides to low FPS on such displays? Also, does it cause any stuttering or tearing issues?
C
CaptainFrix
06-03-2016, 05:38 AM #1

I've just placed my first 144Hz monitor and am excited, but in certain games I struggle to hit close to 144fps. It might be a bottleneck issue or something else. Here are the details: CPU - Intel Xeon E3-1230 3.2GHz with 16GB RAM (8 usable, needs fixing or new RAM). GPU - MSI GTX 1060 with 6GB RAM and a couple of HDDs, no SSD RAID. I'm unsure if some games are more demanding on the CPU or GPU. Estimated average FPS for each game: Fortnite 150-200, CSGO 100-200 (hard to pin down), R6S 90-110, Apex Legends 80-100, GTA V 70-90 (can drop to 50), COD MW 80-110. Also, a quick question: if I keep seeing low FPS on a high refresh monitor, does it actually act as a real-time refresh monitor? Are there any downsides to low FPS on such displays? Also, does it cause any stuttering or tearing issues?

0
0sKHD
Member
226
06-03-2016, 05:57 AM
#2
Choose an SSD. Ignore speed if it means waiting 10 minutes just to open Windows and another 5 more before you can use anything.
0
0sKHD
06-03-2016, 05:57 AM #2

Choose an SSD. Ignore speed if it means waiting 10 minutes just to open Windows and another 5 more before you can use anything.

R
ReD_T1000
Member
168
06-03-2016, 11:05 AM
#3
I’d start by checking the CPU and board specs, but I’m not sure how those 115x Xeons handle high frame rates. If you have a free sync or gsync setup, it should function as expected—waiting until the next frame is ready. Most xxxxSync models will show a required minimum frame rate, often around 40fps.
R
ReD_T1000
06-03-2016, 11:05 AM #3

I’d start by checking the CPU and board specs, but I’m not sure how those 115x Xeons handle high frame rates. If you have a free sync or gsync setup, it should function as expected—waiting until the next frame is ready. Most xxxxSync models will show a required minimum frame rate, often around 40fps.

A
Absham
Member
182
06-09-2016, 10:44 PM
#4
I understand SSDs are significantly quicker than traditional hard drives. However, my loading times aren't a major concern for me—I actually view my current performance as quite fast. I'm also focused on boosting frame rates.
A
Absham
06-09-2016, 10:44 PM #4

I understand SSDs are significantly quicker than traditional hard drives. However, my loading times aren't a major concern for me—I actually view my current performance as quite fast. I'm also focused on boosting frame rates.

T
ThePixelDino
Junior Member
10
06-10-2016, 02:29 AM
#5
I'm checking options for a new CPU, specifically an i7-2700k that fits your socket. Your graphics card uses PCIe 3.0, but your motherboard only supports PCIe 2.0—will this impact performance noticeably?
T
ThePixelDino
06-10-2016, 02:29 AM #5

I'm checking options for a new CPU, specifically an i7-2700k that fits your socket. Your graphics card uses PCIe 3.0, but your motherboard only supports PCIe 2.0—will this impact performance noticeably?