F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Consider using a compatible Linux distribution for your 2009 laptops.

Consider using a compatible Linux distribution for your 2009 laptops.

Consider using a compatible Linux distribution for your 2009 laptops.

D
54
07-28-2016, 03:40 AM
#1
They both use AMD dual-core chips. One runs at 1 GHz, the other at 1.3 GHz. One has 4 GB of RAM while the other uses 2 GB DDR3. All have sufficient storage for any Linux system. I was considering Ubuntu, but I believe it might be too demanding given the slower processors.
D
DinoAndTheMilk
07-28-2016, 03:40 AM #1

They both use AMD dual-core chips. One runs at 1 GHz, the other at 1.3 GHz. One has 4 GB of RAM while the other uses 2 GB DDR3. All have sufficient storage for any Linux system. I was considering Ubuntu, but I believe it might be too demanding given the slower processors.

S
spy_321
Member
50
07-28-2016, 12:10 PM
#2
2GB version uses Xubuntu on Debian Arch, 4GB version runs OpenSUSE Ubuntu Pop!_OS on Fedora Arch
S
spy_321
07-28-2016, 12:10 PM #2

2GB version uses Xubuntu on Debian Arch, 4GB version runs OpenSUSE Ubuntu Pop!_OS on Fedora Arch

S
Saintrow9345
Member
213
08-01-2016, 09:33 PM
#3
He could use any of these options for either laptop. Picking the suitable desktop manager is what matters, the underlying OS has minimal impact on speed.
S
Saintrow9345
08-01-2016, 09:33 PM #3

He could use any of these options for either laptop. Picking the suitable desktop manager is what matters, the underlying OS has minimal impact on speed.

J
JaxxyzZ
Junior Member
1
08-22-2016, 04:05 PM
#4
It's not the operating systems, it's the default memory consumption.
J
JaxxyzZ
08-22-2016, 04:05 PM #4

It's not the operating systems, it's the default memory consumption.

K
KoalaExprezz
Member
52
08-22-2016, 06:24 PM
#5
I'm focusing on Linux Mint as the least ideal laptop option and Xubuntu for the alternative one.
K
KoalaExprezz
08-22-2016, 06:24 PM #5

I'm focusing on Linux Mint as the least ideal laptop option and Xubuntu for the alternative one.

_
_DarkStone_
Member
227
08-22-2016, 07:31 PM
#6
I use Mint on my laptop and it works perfectly. The startup is fast thanks to the SSD upgrade, and it handles everything I require. I prefer Mint over Ubuntu more. Manjaro didn’t perform as well as Mint does, possibly because the old HDD was failing (which is why we switched to SSD).
_
_DarkStone_
08-22-2016, 07:31 PM #6

I use Mint on my laptop and it works perfectly. The startup is fast thanks to the SSD upgrade, and it handles everything I require. I prefer Mint over Ubuntu more. Manjaro didn’t perform as well as Mint does, possibly because the old HDD was failing (which is why we switched to SSD).

S
Squirmyyy
Junior Member
32
08-22-2016, 08:20 PM
#7
Debian installation provides a minimal base system. I steer clear of Gnome and KDE desktops on machines lacking an SSD. They work fine on 4GB systems, but these sophisticated interfaces feel sluggish on a 5400rpm hard drive. True tech enthusiasts don’t require a desktop environment.
S
Squirmyyy
08-22-2016, 08:20 PM #7

Debian installation provides a minimal base system. I steer clear of Gnome and KDE desktops on machines lacking an SSD. They work fine on 4GB systems, but these sophisticated interfaces feel sluggish on a 5400rpm hard drive. True tech enthusiasts don’t require a desktop environment.

R
ReborntoKill
Posting Freak
821
08-23-2016, 04:48 AM
#8
I recommend Mint for both of them. My preference would be the MATE edition. It performs exceptionally on older systems.
R
ReborntoKill
08-23-2016, 04:48 AM #8

I recommend Mint for both of them. My preference would be the MATE edition. It performs exceptionally on older systems.