F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Consider upgrading to a more recent processor like the 8th or 10th generation for better performance.

Consider upgrading to a more recent processor like the 8th or 10th generation for better performance.

Consider upgrading to a more recent processor like the 8th or 10th generation for better performance.

I
Ian77
Member
110
10-04-2016, 12:35 PM
#1
I’ve had my 6600k for a few years now and it’s starting to show it’s age when playing a few different games. Namely Escape from Tarkov is having a hard time pushing 75fps, sometimes even 60 on a few maps. This is kind of a problem in a game which is based on tactics awareness. Even Kerbal space program has trouble in busy scenes where there is a lot of parts and physics (any space station larger than a few segments). Sometimes FPS drops below 30 in these situations. I get a fairly large pay check soon which should cover a comfortable upgrade. I’m looking for anything which will preform well enough to justify the upgrade to it. I’m looking at something which is no more than 250, preferably lower as I need a new mobo and storage as well. Some of the last gen AMD chips look compelling but would it be worth the extra 100 for the 3000 series 7’s over the 2000 series? For reference I have a strix 1070 which slightly out preforms my cpu in most circumstances and 2x8 ram kit which can hit 3200 but I have at 2333 because of instability at higher speeds. Thanks.
I
Ian77
10-04-2016, 12:35 PM #1

I’ve had my 6600k for a few years now and it’s starting to show it’s age when playing a few different games. Namely Escape from Tarkov is having a hard time pushing 75fps, sometimes even 60 on a few maps. This is kind of a problem in a game which is based on tactics awareness. Even Kerbal space program has trouble in busy scenes where there is a lot of parts and physics (any space station larger than a few segments). Sometimes FPS drops below 30 in these situations. I get a fairly large pay check soon which should cover a comfortable upgrade. I’m looking for anything which will preform well enough to justify the upgrade to it. I’m looking at something which is no more than 250, preferably lower as I need a new mobo and storage as well. Some of the last gen AMD chips look compelling but would it be worth the extra 100 for the 3000 series 7’s over the 2000 series? For reference I have a strix 1070 which slightly out preforms my cpu in most circumstances and 2x8 ram kit which can hit 3200 but I have at 2333 because of instability at higher speeds. Thanks.

J
JYSG
Member
171
10-08-2016, 05:58 PM
#2
PCPartPicker list highlights a CPU and motherboard combo. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 at 3.6 GHz offers strong performance for gaming, especially in titles like Tarkov and Kerbal. Pairing it with the MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX ATX AM4 board keeps you ahead of mid-range options. This setup provides solid value, supports future upgrades, and enhances overall system capability.
J
JYSG
10-08-2016, 05:58 PM #2

PCPartPicker list highlights a CPU and motherboard combo. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 at 3.6 GHz offers strong performance for gaming, especially in titles like Tarkov and Kerbal. Pairing it with the MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX ATX AM4 board keeps you ahead of mid-range options. This setup provides solid value, supports future upgrades, and enhances overall system capability.

P
PresPenguin
Junior Member
5
10-10-2016, 09:50 AM
#3
P
PresPenguin
10-10-2016, 09:50 AM #3

_
_Dirty_
Member
163
10-10-2016, 01:50 PM
#4
2700 to 3600 units offer more value for non-gaming projects; games were noted. The 3600 isn't justified unless you're making minor adjustments, in which case it won't change much.
_
_Dirty_
10-10-2016, 01:50 PM #4

2700 to 3600 units offer more value for non-gaming projects; games were noted. The 3600 isn't justified unless you're making minor adjustments, in which case it won't change much.

H
Heryx
Member
123
10-15-2016, 03:24 AM
#5
Sounds good. For chipsets, I’m aiming for something decent but not overly advanced—something around the OCP range would work.
H
Heryx
10-15-2016, 03:24 AM #5

Sounds good. For chipsets, I’m aiming for something decent but not overly advanced—something around the OCP range would work.

E
Everj
Junior Member
41
10-15-2016, 05:05 AM
#6
The B450 I connected provides good overclocking potential and strong VRM performance. If you don’t require PCIe 4.0, the X570 offers limited value given your budget constraints.
E
Everj
10-15-2016, 05:05 AM #6

The B450 I connected provides good overclocking potential and strong VRM performance. If you don’t require PCIe 4.0, the X570 offers limited value given your budget constraints.

F
FandomSouls
Junior Member
12
10-15-2016, 06:47 AM
#7
You should consider it important. The B450 requires a BIOS update to work with the 3000 series motherboards.
F
FandomSouls
10-15-2016, 06:47 AM #7

You should consider it important. The B450 requires a BIOS update to work with the 3000 series motherboards.

J
Jaze2340
Member
70
10-28-2016, 05:26 PM
#8
I connected the latest MAX version of the board. That’s already handled. It stands out since MSI modified them specifically for the 3rd Gen Ryzen.
J
Jaze2340
10-28-2016, 05:26 PM #8

I connected the latest MAX version of the board. That’s already handled. It stands out since MSI modified them specifically for the 3rd Gen Ryzen.

H
hoempapa21
Member
162
10-28-2016, 07:15 PM
#9
Boardsboards MSI B450 Gaming Plus MAX and MSI B450 A-Pro MAX offer great value at around 99USD. Both feature solid VRM heatsinks suitable for 6 to 8 cores, matching the performance of similar models.
H
hoempapa21
10-28-2016, 07:15 PM #9

Boardsboards MSI B450 Gaming Plus MAX and MSI B450 A-Pro MAX offer great value at around 99USD. Both feature solid VRM heatsinks suitable for 6 to 8 cores, matching the performance of similar models.

V
Viitin7
Member
214
10-31-2016, 11:32 AM
#10
For affordable boards? they still work well for users who don’t plan to upgrade the CPU beyond a standard 8-core setup. However, I’m not convinced this buyer is trying to save around $15 just for a cheaper platform. It doesn’t sound like they’re prioritizing a faster CPU right now. This message seems a bit misleading. Both of us recognize the Tomahawk ranks higher than others in the forum’s motherboard quality ranking. It offers top VRM performance on the B450, while the other options lag behind in that area. I’d argue it’s better to invest in a solid motherboard rather than cutting costs by $15, especially if you might want to upgrade your CPU later or switch to a new Ryzen 4th Gen chip and keep using the same board. It makes sense to keep your choices within reach without sacrificing the long-term upgrade potential of the AM4 platform.
V
Viitin7
10-31-2016, 11:32 AM #10

For affordable boards? they still work well for users who don’t plan to upgrade the CPU beyond a standard 8-core setup. However, I’m not convinced this buyer is trying to save around $15 just for a cheaper platform. It doesn’t sound like they’re prioritizing a faster CPU right now. This message seems a bit misleading. Both of us recognize the Tomahawk ranks higher than others in the forum’s motherboard quality ranking. It offers top VRM performance on the B450, while the other options lag behind in that area. I’d argue it’s better to invest in a solid motherboard rather than cutting costs by $15, especially if you might want to upgrade your CPU later or switch to a new Ryzen 4th Gen chip and keep using the same board. It makes sense to keep your choices within reach without sacrificing the long-term upgrade potential of the AM4 platform.