F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Consider these options:

Consider these options:

Consider these options:

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
M
melpanda
Member
176
01-28-2017, 06:20 PM
#11
Currently available at $26.84 for sale. Find the offer here.
M
melpanda
01-28-2017, 06:20 PM #11

Currently available at $26.84 for sale. Find the offer here.

A
AikaProducts
Member
59
01-28-2017, 07:37 PM
#12
A
AikaProducts
01-28-2017, 07:37 PM #12

J
jontxo
Member
55
02-05-2017, 04:38 AM
#13
They made the worst possible effort with driver support at launch, and the UAC appeared too obvious, but now Vista functions properly. Relevant topic: Windows 8.1. Adapting quickly is best.
J
jontxo
02-05-2017, 04:38 AM #13

They made the worst possible effort with driver support at launch, and the UAC appeared too obvious, but now Vista functions properly. Relevant topic: Windows 8.1. Adapting quickly is best.

S
SamurotTris
Junior Member
4
02-05-2017, 06:24 AM
#14
:I just completed a new XP Home Edition SP3 update on my primary machine. It's not my netbook.
S
SamurotTris
02-05-2017, 06:24 AM #14

:I just completed a new XP Home Edition SP3 update on my primary machine. It's not my netbook.

S
steel51
Member
205
02-06-2017, 05:09 AM
#15
Absolutely, I prefer version 8.1 over Win7. Windows 8 resembles a streamlined version of Windows 7, though it offers fewer features that you might disable (which is a bit disappointing since I use other programs).
S
steel51
02-06-2017, 05:09 AM #15

Absolutely, I prefer version 8.1 over Win7. Windows 8 resembles a streamlined version of Windows 7, though it offers fewer features that you might disable (which is a bit disappointing since I use other programs).

O
oggypop
Member
240
02-06-2017, 05:36 AM
#16
The oddity of the Windows 8/8.1 start button is that it's the first time Microsoft introduced a genuine start button, unlike most users who were used to turning off their PCs. I recall the strong reaction when the start button debuted in Windows 95, with many people criticizing it. Over the years, Microsoft added more features, but now they seem to be taking a different approach—it didn't work well on desktop PCs. It's just part of normal Windows evolution, similar to how Windows Vista evolved into Windows 7. For gaming, stick with Windows 8.1, as the other options aren't suitable for productivity tasks.
O
oggypop
02-06-2017, 05:36 AM #16

The oddity of the Windows 8/8.1 start button is that it's the first time Microsoft introduced a genuine start button, unlike most users who were used to turning off their PCs. I recall the strong reaction when the start button debuted in Windows 95, with many people criticizing it. Over the years, Microsoft added more features, but now they seem to be taking a different approach—it didn't work well on desktop PCs. It's just part of normal Windows evolution, similar to how Windows Vista evolved into Windows 7. For gaming, stick with Windows 8.1, as the other options aren't suitable for productivity tasks.

W
Wolfyyy_
Senior Member
358
02-18-2017, 04:25 PM
#17
I usually skip a generation and I've been fortunate enough to have had this. I've used versions from 3.1 up through XP, Win7, and now Win8. I'm not fond of Win8 because the changes to the start button were too drastic for me. I find it annoying to have to search for programs using a search bar, and the tile layout isn't suited for touchscreens—something I definitely don’t want. In my opinion, they moved too fast with Win8. You shouldn't remove standard elements like the start button, which has remained consistent since Win 3.1. It should have been an option rather than a necessity. While they did bring back the button, its functionality wasn't what I expected. I believe Windows 9 should offer two editions—one for tablets and touchscreens with tiles, and another with the same core but classic features. I’d be willing to pay more for the classic version, so they should consider that when planning their strategy. More options would be better, not fewer. Otherwise, it could pave the way for Linux to challenge them in gaming, especially if SteamOS remains limited. Right now, the only advantage Windows has is its compatibility with games. If gaming and SteamOS expand, Windows might lose its leading position in five years. It won’t be anyone’s fault—just their own by limiting choices.
W
Wolfyyy_
02-18-2017, 04:25 PM #17

I usually skip a generation and I've been fortunate enough to have had this. I've used versions from 3.1 up through XP, Win7, and now Win8. I'm not fond of Win8 because the changes to the start button were too drastic for me. I find it annoying to have to search for programs using a search bar, and the tile layout isn't suited for touchscreens—something I definitely don’t want. In my opinion, they moved too fast with Win8. You shouldn't remove standard elements like the start button, which has remained consistent since Win 3.1. It should have been an option rather than a necessity. While they did bring back the button, its functionality wasn't what I expected. I believe Windows 9 should offer two editions—one for tablets and touchscreens with tiles, and another with the same core but classic features. I’d be willing to pay more for the classic version, so they should consider that when planning their strategy. More options would be better, not fewer. Otherwise, it could pave the way for Linux to challenge them in gaming, especially if SteamOS remains limited. Right now, the only advantage Windows has is its compatibility with games. If gaming and SteamOS expand, Windows might lose its leading position in five years. It won’t be anyone’s fault—just their own by limiting choices.

C
Chronodran
Junior Member
39
02-18-2017, 10:44 PM
#18
I’d choose Windows 7 simply because it’s the one I like most.
C
Chronodran
02-18-2017, 10:44 PM #18

I’d choose Windows 7 simply because it’s the one I like most.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2