F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Consider the options: 2600 with 1670 super or 3600 with 1650 super.

Consider the options: 2600 with 1670 super or 3600 with 1650 super.

Consider the options: 2600 with 1670 super or 3600 with 1650 super.

D
deadman9966
Junior Member
7
09-03-2019, 03:17 PM
#1
I'm planning on building a pc , after I sum up all the components , I found out that I have two choice , should I go with ryzen 5 2600 with gtx 1660 super or ryzen 5 3600 with gtx 1650 super . I couldn't go with ryzen 5 3600 with gtx 1660 super as there is a budget . The mobo I'm planing on using is asrock b450 steel legend . Is there a major change between the 2600 and 3600 ?
D
deadman9966
09-03-2019, 03:17 PM #1

I'm planning on building a pc , after I sum up all the components , I found out that I have two choice , should I go with ryzen 5 2600 with gtx 1660 super or ryzen 5 3600 with gtx 1650 super . I couldn't go with ryzen 5 3600 with gtx 1660 super as there is a budget . The mobo I'm planing on using is asrock b450 steel legend . Is there a major change between the 2600 and 3600 ?

D
128
09-03-2019, 04:58 PM
#2
One model is more demanding on the CPU, while the other relies more on the GPU. The 1660s includes features absent in the 1650, making feature selection important. Generally, the gap between these eras is larger than between the 2600s and 3600s, though it varies based on the task. The 1660s is better suited for specific workloads where CPU power isn’t essential, such as non-gaming applications.
D
DiamondDasher3
09-03-2019, 04:58 PM #2

One model is more demanding on the CPU, while the other relies more on the GPU. The 1660s includes features absent in the 1650, making feature selection important. Generally, the gap between these eras is larger than between the 2600s and 3600s, though it varies based on the task. The 1660s is better suited for specific workloads where CPU power isn’t essential, such as non-gaming applications.

S
SoaringEagle
Member
59
09-08-2019, 01:47 PM
#3
Looking at the 1660, it falls in the same range as the 1650 super. To determine if it's a better option, compare their features and value.
S
SoaringEagle
09-08-2019, 01:47 PM #3

Looking at the 1660, it falls in the same range as the 1650 super. To determine if it's a better option, compare their features and value.

A
AXELANATION
Junior Member
44
09-09-2019, 05:22 AM
#4
I’m not sure. One notable feature of the 1660s is a significantly upgraded GPU chip. I’m not certain if it existed in that year. When I checked the distinctions between a 1660 and a 1660s, it turned out to be more than just the use of GDDR6—it actually included more rops and cores as well. I recommend researching the differences to understand what changed.
A
AXELANATION
09-09-2019, 05:22 AM #4

I’m not sure. One notable feature of the 1660s is a significantly upgraded GPU chip. I’m not certain if it existed in that year. When I checked the distinctions between a 1660 and a 1660s, it turned out to be more than just the use of GDDR6—it actually included more rops and cores as well. I recommend researching the differences to understand what changed.

D
Danjaberry
Member
65
09-16-2019, 01:08 AM
#5
For gaming purposes, I recommend choosing a GPU with higher speed. The difference in performance between GPUs will be more significant than the minor variations in CPU speed.
D
Danjaberry
09-16-2019, 01:08 AM #5

For gaming purposes, I recommend choosing a GPU with higher speed. The difference in performance between GPUs will be more significant than the minor variations in CPU speed.

F
FLPFive
Member
170
09-21-2019, 06:21 PM
#6
A helpful video highlights the distinctions in a practical environment.
F
FLPFive
09-21-2019, 06:21 PM #6

A helpful video highlights the distinctions in a practical environment.

P
Pawtex
Member
114
09-22-2019, 03:15 PM
#7
This applies to tasks beyond gaming where CUDA is involved or streaming occurs. The 1650 lacks CUDA cores and a hardware NVIDIA VELOCITY encoder. Possible reasons for using it include higher power needs, which might mean a PSU upgrade is necessary. If replacing the GPU is required and neither the 1660 nor the 1650 suffices due to budget constraints, choosing the 1650 could have saved money.
P
Pawtex
09-22-2019, 03:15 PM #7

This applies to tasks beyond gaming where CUDA is involved or streaming occurs. The 1650 lacks CUDA cores and a hardware NVIDIA VELOCITY encoder. Possible reasons for using it include higher power needs, which might mean a PSU upgrade is necessary. If replacing the GPU is required and neither the 1660 nor the 1650 suffices due to budget constraints, choosing the 1650 could have saved money.

K
kcristan
Senior Member
514
09-23-2019, 02:47 AM
#8
Alright, I've got that covered. The 1660S seems like a solid non-RTX card, whereas the 1650(S) appears to be more of a cost-focused, lower-performance option.
K
kcristan
09-23-2019, 02:47 AM #8

Alright, I've got that covered. The 1660S seems like a solid non-RTX card, whereas the 1650(S) appears to be more of a cost-focused, lower-performance option.

T
TiamoTiamo2014
Junior Member
49
09-23-2019, 02:59 AM
#9
The distinction between the 1660 and the 1660s isn’t clear to me. Initially, people thought it was a 1660 with gddr6 instead of gddr5, but the data I found contradicted that. There’s more to it than what I understand.
T
TiamoTiamo2014
09-23-2019, 02:59 AM #9

The distinction between the 1660 and the 1660s isn’t clear to me. Initially, people thought it was a 1660 with gddr6 instead of gddr5, but the data I found contradicted that. There’s more to it than what I understand.