F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Consider reducing voltage or selecting a CPU with lower TDP for your NAS setup.

Consider reducing voltage or selecting a CPU with lower TDP for your NAS setup.

Consider reducing voltage or selecting a CPU with lower TDP for your NAS setup.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
K
Klitaurus
Member
69
03-25-2016, 12:03 AM
#11
K
Klitaurus
03-25-2016, 12:03 AM #11

F
FuzzyAJD
Junior Member
21
03-25-2016, 12:20 PM
#12
Thanks a lot for the input. It might be better to consider a more affordable processor—like the 3570K or similar low-power models—especially if you're focusing on NAS. Those options are usually cheaper second-hand and could work well.
F
FuzzyAJD
03-25-2016, 12:20 PM #12

Thanks a lot for the input. It might be better to consider a more affordable processor—like the 3570K or similar low-power models—especially if you're focusing on NAS. Those options are usually cheaper second-hand and could work well.

W
wybren
Member
74
04-09-2016, 10:04 AM
#13
Based on your actual power requirements, a completely integrated board using laptop-level components could further reduce energy use. In fact, even a used laptop can be quite efficient. My NAS began with an Atom chip, which was about 18 watts in total consumption before the drives were added.
W
wybren
04-09-2016, 10:04 AM #13

Based on your actual power requirements, a completely integrated board using laptop-level components could further reduce energy use. In fact, even a used laptop can be quite efficient. My NAS began with an Atom chip, which was about 18 watts in total consumption before the drives were added.

R
RpPradaToR
Junior Member
8
04-12-2016, 06:37 PM
#14
That sounds like a solid approach, though setting up a rack-mounted system could be tricky. Powering the board and drives independently might require careful planning to avoid any performance issues.
R
RpPradaToR
04-12-2016, 06:37 PM #14

That sounds like a solid approach, though setting up a rack-mounted system could be tricky. Powering the board and drives independently might require careful planning to avoid any performance issues.

E
EmeraldQuartz
Member
50
04-12-2016, 07:05 PM
#15
Top energy saver: Athlon 200ge series. Consumes just 21 watts.
E
EmeraldQuartz
04-12-2016, 07:05 PM #15

Top energy saver: Athlon 200ge series. Consumes just 21 watts.

X
Xx_Pipo_xX
Junior Member
4
04-12-2016, 09:06 PM
#16
That's quite a strong statement, really. If I choose to invest in the full NAS system, it could be the most appealing choice I've come across so far.
X
Xx_Pipo_xX
04-12-2016, 09:06 PM #16

That's quite a strong statement, really. If I choose to invest in the full NAS system, it could be the most appealing choice I've come across so far.

L
LBQ709
Junior Member
40
04-12-2016, 09:31 PM
#17
It accounts for about a third of the FX power expense. Because it's an AM4 chipset, you can easily increase its capacity if necessary. For personal NAS systems, two cores are sufficient. If you prefer lower performance, options like ATOM or Celeron J-series work well.
L
LBQ709
04-12-2016, 09:31 PM #17

It accounts for about a third of the FX power expense. Because it's an AM4 chipset, you can easily increase its capacity if necessary. For personal NAS systems, two cores are sufficient. If you prefer lower performance, options like ATOM or Celeron J-series work well.

S
Sensei__Panda
Junior Member
37
04-14-2016, 01:58 PM
#18
An older laptop with a damaged screen might work well for external storage use, especially if you have few drives. It’s affordable and uses minimal power. Are you mainly transferring files or doing more complex tasks like converting them?
S
Sensei__Panda
04-14-2016, 01:58 PM #18

An older laptop with a damaged screen might work well for external storage use, especially if you have few drives. It’s affordable and uses minimal power. Are you mainly transferring files or doing more complex tasks like converting them?

Pages (2): Previous 1 2