F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Consider AM5 motherboards for enhanced performance and compatibility.

Consider AM5 motherboards for enhanced performance and compatibility.

Consider AM5 motherboards for enhanced performance and compatibility.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
N
NottaSpy
Member
232
07-05-2023, 12:53 PM
#11
Where are you located? For most, the 7800X3D is $339. The 7900X3D launched at $599, not $850. You sure you're talking about the correct CPUs? No idea on the Pro X vs AX. All I know is unless you need or want Gen 5 stuff, B650 is the way to go for AM5 as the boards are stout enough for even 7950X and the new 9xxx chips as well.
N
NottaSpy
07-05-2023, 12:53 PM #11

Where are you located? For most, the 7800X3D is $339. The 7900X3D launched at $599, not $850. You sure you're talking about the correct CPUs? No idea on the Pro X vs AX. All I know is unless you need or want Gen 5 stuff, B650 is the way to go for AM5 as the boards are stout enough for even 7950X and the new 9xxx chips as well.

M
miknes123
Senior Member
646
07-05-2023, 02:16 PM
#12
Canada, the costs appear somewhat irregular at the moment.
M
miknes123
07-05-2023, 02:16 PM #12

Canada, the costs appear somewhat irregular at the moment.

S
stvincent2004
Junior Member
42
07-05-2023, 02:36 PM
#13
I narrowed down the PCPartPicker board selection to match my budget. I left out any boards smaller than ATX and any larger. Additionally, I removed all Asus models based on the criteria mentioned earlier.
S
stvincent2004
07-05-2023, 02:36 PM #13

I narrowed down the PCPartPicker board selection to match my budget. I left out any boards smaller than ATX and any larger. Additionally, I removed all Asus models based on the criteria mentioned earlier.

K
kladdis1
Junior Member
39
07-08-2023, 04:44 PM
#14
Some sub 200 boards aren't necessarily bad—they're just a lot of mediocre ones. Over the past year, many manufacturers launched impressive products, but then released lower-quality models around 120-160 USD that didn’t hold up well. At launch, they looked good, but over time their performance faded, hoping reviews wouldn’t catch up.
K
kladdis1
07-08-2023, 04:44 PM #14

Some sub 200 boards aren't necessarily bad—they're just a lot of mediocre ones. Over the past year, many manufacturers launched impressive products, but then released lower-quality models around 120-160 USD that didn’t hold up well. At launch, they looked good, but over time their performance faded, hoping reviews wouldn’t catch up.

G
goephi
Member
210
07-08-2023, 11:49 PM
#15
I also saw a video about this on Hardware Unboxed on YouTube earlier.
G
goephi
07-08-2023, 11:49 PM #15

I also saw a video about this on Hardware Unboxed on YouTube earlier.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2