F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Consider a more advanced hypervisor for improved performance.

Consider a more advanced hypervisor for improved performance.

Consider a more advanced hypervisor for improved performance.

2
2ciniseb2
Junior Member
42
10-15-2016, 12:46 PM
#1
Hello. I've been working with VMWare Workstation 11 for a while now, but it's been a bit inconsistent. It sometimes freezes or restarts itself, and I often can't access Task Manager to stop it. Explorer also crashes at times, which means I have to reset everything and lose my running VMs. I'm looking for something more reliable. It should support NAT, offer strong performance, and most importantly, be very stable. I'm currently using Windows 8.1 Core, so Hyper-V isn't an option.
2
2ciniseb2
10-15-2016, 12:46 PM #1

Hello. I've been working with VMWare Workstation 11 for a while now, but it's been a bit inconsistent. It sometimes freezes or restarts itself, and I often can't access Task Manager to stop it. Explorer also crashes at times, which means I have to reset everything and lose my running VMs. I'm looking for something more reliable. It should support NAT, offer strong performance, and most importantly, be very stable. I'm currently using Windows 8.1 Core, so Hyper-V isn't an option.

V
volcanix1000
Member
159
10-20-2016, 11:15 PM
#2
The only other option I recall is VirtualBox. I’m not certain about Citrix; they probably offer a VM player as well.
V
volcanix1000
10-20-2016, 11:15 PM #2

The only other option I recall is VirtualBox. I’m not certain about Citrix; they probably offer a VM player as well.

F
FureaMC
Senior Member
564
10-21-2016, 06:04 AM
#3
Virtualbox wasn't running smoothly. That's why I moved to VMWare.
F
FureaMC
10-21-2016, 06:04 AM #3

Virtualbox wasn't running smoothly. That's why I moved to VMWare.

J
JustCroey
Member
77
10-21-2016, 06:10 AM
#4
XenClient from Citrix is available, but it's currently in a trial phase.
J
JustCroey
10-21-2016, 06:10 AM #4

XenClient from Citrix is available, but it's currently in a trial phase.

I
iBrendan
Junior Member
34
10-22-2016, 01:53 PM
#5
Have you thought about obtaining a Pro license and leveraging Hyper-V? I know it wasn’t initially an option, but since I have a Pro account and it functions well, I’m open to trying it. It’s not ideal for me as I don’t regularly use VM setups, though I occasionally experiment. The price difference shouldn’t be significant, particularly if you follow the software swap discussions people share.
I
iBrendan
10-22-2016, 01:53 PM #5

Have you thought about obtaining a Pro license and leveraging Hyper-V? I know it wasn’t initially an option, but since I have a Pro account and it functions well, I’m open to trying it. It’s not ideal for me as I don’t regularly use VM setups, though I occasionally experiment. The price difference shouldn’t be significant, particularly if you follow the software swap discussions people share.

J
137
10-23-2016, 02:41 AM
#6
I considered the issue, but the challenge with Hyper-V is its absence of NAT capabilities. I attempted it, and the main issue was the lack of NAT functionality.
J
jedi_sandmite_
10-23-2016, 02:41 AM #6

I considered the issue, but the challenge with Hyper-V is its absence of NAT capabilities. I attempted it, and the main issue was the lack of NAT functionality.

P
PaidroH
Junior Member
14
10-23-2016, 09:57 PM
#7
Yes, it is stable.
P
PaidroH
10-23-2016, 09:57 PM #7

Yes, it is stable.

H
HellNether
Senior Member
731
10-24-2016, 11:54 PM
#8
I believed it did, or else I wouldn’t have said it. Sorry.
H
HellNether
10-24-2016, 11:54 PM #8

I believed it did, or else I wouldn’t have said it. Sorry.

Z
Zam_GM
Member
158
10-25-2016, 12:58 AM
#9
There seems to be a method to work around VMWare NAT. I plan to test it out. I was also thinking about upgrading to 10 Pro during the initial release.
Z
Zam_GM
10-25-2016, 12:58 AM #9

There seems to be a method to work around VMWare NAT. I plan to test it out. I was also thinking about upgrading to 10 Pro during the initial release.