F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Connecting to a gadget via a local network without physically linking

Connecting to a gadget via a local network without physically linking

Connecting to a gadget via a local network without physically linking

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
C
crosser146
Member
63
07-09-2023, 08:27 AM
#1
I’m still figuring out the best way to describe what you need. You mentioned having two separate internet connections—one for your home network and another for your self-hosted servers—and you’re looking for a setup where both can be accessed seamlessly from any device, regardless of which network it is connected to. Right now, you can switch between them manually, but you want a more unified experience so that devices on one network can communicate with those on the other without extra steps. You’re also interested in having routers or modems talk to each other automatically, making it simple to manage access across all your networks from a single interface. This would be useful for both personal use and managing servers efficiently. I’m not sure if there’s an existing standard term for this, but you might want to explore networking solutions like VLANs, wireless bridging, or a unified management platform. If you’d like, I can suggest some tools or configurations that could help achieve this goal. Let me know how you’d like to proceed!
C
crosser146
07-09-2023, 08:27 AM #1

I’m still figuring out the best way to describe what you need. You mentioned having two separate internet connections—one for your home network and another for your self-hosted servers—and you’re looking for a setup where both can be accessed seamlessly from any device, regardless of which network it is connected to. Right now, you can switch between them manually, but you want a more unified experience so that devices on one network can communicate with those on the other without extra steps. You’re also interested in having routers or modems talk to each other automatically, making it simple to manage access across all your networks from a single interface. This would be useful for both personal use and managing servers efficiently. I’m not sure if there’s an existing standard term for this, but you might want to explore networking solutions like VLANs, wireless bridging, or a unified management platform. If you’d like, I can suggest some tools or configurations that could help achieve this goal. Let me know how you’d like to proceed!

G
Gabokazu
Posting Freak
814
07-09-2023, 10:26 AM
#2
Consider using a VPN for that purpose. Alternatively, you can set up a router linked to both ISP connections with two separate subnets for various devices.
G
Gabokazu
07-09-2023, 10:26 AM #2

Consider using a VPN for that purpose. Alternatively, you can set up a router linked to both ISP connections with two separate subnets for various devices.

M
meatybeast1
Junior Member
7
07-15-2023, 12:16 AM
#3
Choose one use and it functions immediately—no extra steps needed per device, avoiding VPN requirements.
M
meatybeast1
07-15-2023, 12:16 AM #3

Choose one use and it functions immediately—no extra steps needed per device, avoiding VPN requirements.

A
Angelclaw
Junior Member
47
07-15-2023, 12:43 AM
#4
The single router approach works significantly better. VPNs can be handled directly on the routers, eliminating the need for device configuration. These are the types of routers involved—consumer-grade models typically don’t support such setups.
A
Angelclaw
07-15-2023, 12:43 AM #4

The single router approach works significantly better. VPNs can be handled directly on the routers, eliminating the need for device configuration. These are the types of routers involved—consumer-grade models typically don’t support such setups.

A
Aruan_Vargas
Member
233
07-15-2023, 01:08 AM
#5
The issue lies in the fact that they are both standard consumer routers or modems provided by ISPs. One uses DSL, the other cable. Here are some specific models: ZTE ZXHN H168N Cisco EPC3925. It might be worth considering whether purchasing additional equipment is necessary, particularly if it's costly. Currently, you can manage everything with just Wi-Fi on your phone and other devices connected to both networks via your PC.
A
Aruan_Vargas
07-15-2023, 01:08 AM #5

The issue lies in the fact that they are both standard consumer routers or modems provided by ISPs. One uses DSL, the other cable. Here are some specific models: ZTE ZXHN H168N Cisco EPC3925. It might be worth considering whether purchasing additional equipment is necessary, particularly if it's costly. Currently, you can manage everything with just Wi-Fi on your phone and other devices connected to both networks via your PC.

E
ElFrank365
Member
99
07-22-2023, 04:28 AM
#6
consider getting a single router where both ISP connections are plugged in—it's the better option.
E
ElFrank365
07-22-2023, 04:28 AM #6

consider getting a single router where both ISP connections are plugged in—it's the better option.

H
HARRIBO45600
Member
69
08-03-2023, 12:35 PM
#7
Yes, there are some suggestions available for that situation.
H
HARRIBO45600
08-03-2023, 12:35 PM #7

Yes, there are some suggestions available for that situation.

M
MrWorldWide_e
Member
65
08-08-2023, 10:51 PM
#8
We're considering the type of bandwidth in question. Pfsense would be suitable, whether deployed on a virtual machine, an x86 computer, or purchased as a ready-made device from Netgate. Other router operating systems such as OPNsense, Untangle, and similar platforms should also function here.
M
MrWorldWide_e
08-08-2023, 10:51 PM #8

We're considering the type of bandwidth in question. Pfsense would be suitable, whether deployed on a virtual machine, an x86 computer, or purchased as a ready-made device from Netgate. Other router operating systems such as OPNsense, Untangle, and similar platforms should also function here.

Y
YuriXbr
Junior Member
21
08-10-2023, 09:02 PM
#9
The setup looks moderate. I plan to experiment with pfSense, but it seems I’ll need at least three Ethernet ports on the server—two for incoming internet traffic and one for outgoing. Or maybe just two are enough since the third isn’t essential? I’m trying to keep things affordable or even free, as most options in my area are either unavailable or costly.
Y
YuriXbr
08-10-2023, 09:02 PM #9

The setup looks moderate. I plan to experiment with pfSense, but it seems I’ll need at least three Ethernet ports on the server—two for incoming internet traffic and one for outgoing. Or maybe just two are enough since the third isn’t essential? I’m trying to keep things affordable or even free, as most options in my area are either unavailable or costly.

R
Roxannekuroto
Junior Member
4
08-17-2023, 01:54 PM
#10
Do you own a managed switch? You could use a single port on your server with VLANs, or three ports otherwise. Currently, there isn’t a completely free option with the equipment you have.
R
Roxannekuroto
08-17-2023, 01:54 PM #10

Do you own a managed switch? You could use a single port on your server with VLANs, or three ports otherwise. Currently, there isn’t a completely free option with the equipment you have.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next