F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Connect Ethernet bridging across three ports

Connect Ethernet bridging across three ports

Connect Ethernet bridging across three ports

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
G
G2PILOT
Junior Member
16
04-03-2016, 12:26 AM
#1
G
G2PILOT
04-03-2016, 12:26 AM #1

P
PinqNoLag
Member
181
04-07-2016, 03:55 AM
#2
It should work because Ethernet sharing exists.
P
PinqNoLag
04-07-2016, 03:55 AM #2

It should work because Ethernet sharing exists.

R
Replicatings
Member
124
04-12-2016, 03:24 AM
#3
All connections should be made to the router. It doesn’t make sense to connect additional devices to the PC. The extra Ethernet ports on the PC will function only when the PC is powered on. You likely received a spare switch if you didn’t have sufficient ports for proper operation.
R
Replicatings
04-12-2016, 03:24 AM #3

All connections should be made to the router. It doesn’t make sense to connect additional devices to the PC. The extra Ethernet ports on the PC will function only when the PC is powered on. You likely received a spare switch if you didn’t have sufficient ports for proper operation.

G
gluonic
Member
234
04-12-2016, 09:33 AM
#4
It might work, but you'd need your computer running and an extra strain on it. Just purchase a budget gigabit switch; they're available for less than $20 on Amazon.
G
gluonic
04-12-2016, 09:33 AM #4

It might work, but you'd need your computer running and an extra strain on it. Just purchase a budget gigabit switch; they're available for less than $20 on Amazon.

A
ACORNMAN
Junior Member
47
04-12-2016, 12:08 PM
#5
Purchase a 5 or 8 port gigabit switch for around twenty dollars.
A
ACORNMAN
04-12-2016, 12:08 PM #5

Purchase a 5 or 8 port gigabit switch for around twenty dollars.

M
Mickael_Park
Member
216
04-13-2016, 12:15 PM
#6
Got one for free but not super fast works tho
M
Mickael_Park
04-13-2016, 12:15 PM #6

Got one for free but not super fast works tho

B
Burgtomate
Member
50
04-20-2016, 05:51 AM
#7
My computer stays active and manages the workload well. I’m choosing this setup since adding more devices would require drilling new holes or installing bigger ones, which isn’t practical. I’m not keen on purchasing a switch unless it’s absolutely essential. I’m looking for any suggestions on a solution so I can connect one cable to my desktop and send it to two other devices while keeping everything linked.
B
Burgtomate
04-20-2016, 05:51 AM #7

My computer stays active and manages the workload well. I’m choosing this setup since adding more devices would require drilling new holes or installing bigger ones, which isn’t practical. I’m not keen on purchasing a switch unless it’s absolutely essential. I’m looking for any suggestions on a solution so I can connect one cable to my desktop and send it to two other devices while keeping everything linked.

J
J0ebyron
Member
225
04-24-2016, 06:13 AM
#8
The suggested solution isn't working. You don't need to create another hole for the cable. Use the existing one for the new switch and connect your computer and other devices there. It's straightforward—you're adding complexity unnecessarily.
J
J0ebyron
04-24-2016, 06:13 AM #8

The suggested solution isn't working. You don't need to create another hole for the cable. Use the existing one for the new switch and connect your computer and other devices there. It's straightforward—you're adding complexity unnecessarily.

A
alexandre6768
Member
219
04-25-2016, 01:10 AM
#9
The issue is that I can't afford to spend a lot on a switch. I understand cheaper options exist, but they tend to be basic and don’t let me manage network speeds per port. I need control over how each port behaves, which is why I’m looking for a solution within Windows using the gear I have. I’ve already connected all three devices and had internet on two of them, but not all three yet. I’m not seeking another method beyond what I’ve mentioned, just advice from someone with real network experience instead of generic suggestions. I’m certain it’s doable, but I’m stuck figuring out where I’m going wrong.
A
alexandre6768
04-25-2016, 01:10 AM #9

The issue is that I can't afford to spend a lot on a switch. I understand cheaper options exist, but they tend to be basic and don’t let me manage network speeds per port. I need control over how each port behaves, which is why I’m looking for a solution within Windows using the gear I have. I’ve already connected all three devices and had internet on two of them, but not all three yet. I’m not seeking another method beyond what I’ve mentioned, just advice from someone with real network experience instead of generic suggestions. I’m certain it’s doable, but I’m stuck figuring out where I’m going wrong.

N
npalmen
Member
202
04-25-2016, 10:11 PM
#10
Windows isn't designed for routing or switching tasks. There are more suitable alternatives available. What you're trying to achieve isn't correct, which is why guidance is scarce. It's not about everyone else being wrong—it's about understanding your own approach. Running a 300-400 watt machine with a full Windows setup and extra bandwidth software isn't ideal. A smaller 5-watt switch would be more efficient and better suited for its role. Managed switches handle networking tasks more effectively than routers. You've already invested in two additional network cards; those could have been used for a switch instead. If you want to go that way, consider: * Connect the main Ethernet to the two secondary ones via network connections * Set all network cards to share the same subnet as your router, and reconfigure your router with GW and DNS * Verify that devices on the secondary ports receive DHCP from the router if not, otherwise set them up manually. In short, don't try to use a large missile to eliminate a small bug just because it seems possible.
N
npalmen
04-25-2016, 10:11 PM #10

Windows isn't designed for routing or switching tasks. There are more suitable alternatives available. What you're trying to achieve isn't correct, which is why guidance is scarce. It's not about everyone else being wrong—it's about understanding your own approach. Running a 300-400 watt machine with a full Windows setup and extra bandwidth software isn't ideal. A smaller 5-watt switch would be more efficient and better suited for its role. Managed switches handle networking tasks more effectively than routers. You've already invested in two additional network cards; those could have been used for a switch instead. If you want to go that way, consider: * Connect the main Ethernet to the two secondary ones via network connections * Set all network cards to share the same subnet as your router, and reconfigure your router with GW and DNS * Verify that devices on the secondary ports receive DHCP from the router if not, otherwise set them up manually. In short, don't try to use a large missile to eliminate a small bug just because it seems possible.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next