F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Configuration of RAM Components

Configuration of RAM Components

Configuration of RAM Components

G
Gamerangel
Junior Member
3
04-25-2016, 02:26 AM
#1
Hello everyone, I’m not sure if there’s an active thread left. Could you please share the link? I bought a stick of DDR4 3000Mhz 16GB RAM when setting up my new PC (I didn’t remember the CAS latency, but it was around 15-17-17-35). I plan to add another stick next month or so. Now I’ve got the same brand and model, but the latency seems different (around 10-19-19-36). My question is: how should I configure this on my motherboard? Should I set the lower latency value? Can I adjust it somewhere in the middle?

Possible thoughts:
- Why didn’t they offer a choice for CAS latency when selling the same product? It was the same brand, but the specs weren’t listed.
- Corsair Vengeance. I thought the timing would be the same since it’s the same brand and model.
G
Gamerangel
04-25-2016, 02:26 AM #1

Hello everyone, I’m not sure if there’s an active thread left. Could you please share the link? I bought a stick of DDR4 3000Mhz 16GB RAM when setting up my new PC (I didn’t remember the CAS latency, but it was around 15-17-17-35). I plan to add another stick next month or so. Now I’ve got the same brand and model, but the latency seems different (around 10-19-19-36). My question is: how should I configure this on my motherboard? Should I set the lower latency value? Can I adjust it somewhere in the middle?

Possible thoughts:
- Why didn’t they offer a choice for CAS latency when selling the same product? It was the same brand, but the specs weren’t listed.
- Corsair Vengeance. I thought the timing would be the same since it’s the same brand and model.

R
Roccoboy8
Member
162
04-25-2016, 05:20 PM
#2
Attempt to execute XMP profile 1 on the device. If successful, memory timings should adapt accordingly. Using RAM will consistently result in the highest latency for both components since synchronization is required. The slower module will dictate the performance, so if a newer version exists it will be limited to match the slower one. This isn't a concern as long as both operate at their advertised speeds. If XMP fails, you'll need to manually adjust clocks and timings. Always configure them to match the slowest module to prevent stability problems. An older board might run memory that was misaligned but would lose dual-channel support, which is actually preferable to having one module marginally faster than the other.
R
Roccoboy8
04-25-2016, 05:20 PM #2

Attempt to execute XMP profile 1 on the device. If successful, memory timings should adapt accordingly. Using RAM will consistently result in the highest latency for both components since synchronization is required. The slower module will dictate the performance, so if a newer version exists it will be limited to match the slower one. This isn't a concern as long as both operate at their advertised speeds. If XMP fails, you'll need to manually adjust clocks and timings. Always configure them to match the slowest module to prevent stability problems. An older board might run memory that was misaligned but would lose dual-channel support, which is actually preferable to having one module marginally faster than the other.

L
Lorddoom139
Posting Freak
956
05-11-2016, 09:38 PM
#3
That's what I accomplished on the XMP settings, though I might have overlooked some performance improvements. I'll share my CPUZ screenshot later, and I appreciate your feedback—it means a lot.
L
Lorddoom139
05-11-2016, 09:38 PM #3

That's what I accomplished on the XMP settings, though I might have overlooked some performance improvements. I'll share my CPUZ screenshot later, and I appreciate your feedback—it means a lot.

I
IamRikyPT
Member
129
05-12-2016, 11:14 AM
#4
Combining sticks can sometimes help, but only if it actually helps. If it does, timing might be off.
I
IamRikyPT
05-12-2016, 11:14 AM #4

Combining sticks can sometimes help, but only if it actually helps. If it does, timing might be off.