F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Notebooks Comparison of Intel Iris Xe Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q with 4GB GDDR6 memory

Comparison of Intel Iris Xe Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q with 4GB GDDR6 memory

Comparison of Intel Iris Xe Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q with 4GB GDDR6 memory

M
minerboy671
Member
61
03-21-2020, 12:40 PM
#1
I want to purchase a laptop and there are two similar models from the brand Asus.
The first one is the ASUS Vivobook 15 OLED X1505ZA-L1511WS, available at the provided link.
It comes with an Intel®Core™ i5-1235U Processor (1.3 GHz, up to 4.4 GHz, 10 cores) and Intel Iris Xe Graphics.
The second one is the ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (M6500, AMD Ryzen 4000 series), available at another link.
It features an AMD Ryzen™ 7 4800H/HS Mobile Processor (8C/16T, 12MB Cache, 4.2 GHz Max Boost) and NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 1650 Max Q 4GB GDDR6.

I plan to do some UI/UX design work initially, but in a few months I aim to edit videos, possibly advanced. I’m considering the second model because it includes the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 4GB GDDR6, whereas the first one uses integrated graphics. The first model also has an Intel i5 12th gen processor.

Which option would be better for video editing? Should I choose the second laptop for that purpose? I’m aware design tasks can be handled well by both brands.
Additionally, if I opt for the first model (Intel), can I later upgrade it with a graphics card if needed?
M
minerboy671
03-21-2020, 12:40 PM #1

I want to purchase a laptop and there are two similar models from the brand Asus.
The first one is the ASUS Vivobook 15 OLED X1505ZA-L1511WS, available at the provided link.
It comes with an Intel®Core™ i5-1235U Processor (1.3 GHz, up to 4.4 GHz, 10 cores) and Intel Iris Xe Graphics.
The second one is the ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (M6500, AMD Ryzen 4000 series), available at another link.
It features an AMD Ryzen™ 7 4800H/HS Mobile Processor (8C/16T, 12MB Cache, 4.2 GHz Max Boost) and NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 1650 Max Q 4GB GDDR6.

I plan to do some UI/UX design work initially, but in a few months I aim to edit videos, possibly advanced. I’m considering the second model because it includes the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 4GB GDDR6, whereas the first one uses integrated graphics. The first model also has an Intel i5 12th gen processor.

Which option would be better for video editing? Should I choose the second laptop for that purpose? I’m aware design tasks can be handled well by both brands.
Additionally, if I opt for the first model (Intel), can I later upgrade it with a graphics card if needed?

E
ElectricLuke
Junior Member
44
03-21-2020, 01:01 PM
#2
In editing videos, the Iris Xe graphics stand out clearly. There are no situations where they match the GTX 1650 Max Q graphics except in 2D gaming performance. For GPU processing and 3D games, they fall far behind.
https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/...e-...el-Iris-Xe
Also, regarding CPU performance, the 4800H offers superior multicore capabilities, making it suitable for most encoding and editing software compared to the 1235U. However, it has slower single-core speed, so applications relying mainly on one thread may run more efficiently on an Intel CPU. Overall, when considering the GPU side...
E
ElectricLuke
03-21-2020, 01:01 PM #2

In editing videos, the Iris Xe graphics stand out clearly. There are no situations where they match the GTX 1650 Max Q graphics except in 2D gaming performance. For GPU processing and 3D games, they fall far behind.
https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/...e-...el-Iris-Xe
Also, regarding CPU performance, the 4800H offers superior multicore capabilities, making it suitable for most encoding and editing software compared to the 1235U. However, it has slower single-core speed, so applications relying mainly on one thread may run more efficiently on an Intel CPU. Overall, when considering the GPU side...

D
Diizzy
Junior Member
16
03-23-2020, 06:30 AM
#3
In editing videos, the Iris Xe graphics stand out clearly. There are no situations where they match the GTX 1650 Max Q graphics except in 2D gaming performance. For GPU compute and 3D gaming, they fall far behind.
https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/...e-...el-Iris-Xe
Regarding CPU performance, the 4800H offers superior multicore capabilities, making it suitable for most encoding and editing software compared to the 1235U. However, it has slower single-core speed, so applications relying mainly on a single thread may run better on an Intel CPU. Overall, considering both GPU and CPU aspects, the discreet graphics option seems more advantageous for your needs.
D
Diizzy
03-23-2020, 06:30 AM #3

In editing videos, the Iris Xe graphics stand out clearly. There are no situations where they match the GTX 1650 Max Q graphics except in 2D gaming performance. For GPU compute and 3D gaming, they fall far behind.
https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/...e-...el-Iris-Xe
Regarding CPU performance, the 4800H offers superior multicore capabilities, making it suitable for most encoding and editing software compared to the 1235U. However, it has slower single-core speed, so applications relying mainly on a single thread may run better on an Intel CPU. Overall, considering both GPU and CPU aspects, the discreet graphics option seems more advantageous for your needs.

C
CocaCola15
Senior Member
603
03-24-2020, 11:46 PM
#4
Hi! Thank you for the response! Your time is appreciated.
C
CocaCola15
03-24-2020, 11:46 PM #4

Hi! Thank you for the response! Your time is appreciated.

Y
Yukiioross
Member
65
04-01-2020, 06:55 AM
#5
Anytime.
Y
Yukiioross
04-01-2020, 06:55 AM #5

Anytime.