Comparison of 8700k and 9700k models in a new build
Comparison of 8700k and 9700k models in a new build
SolidWorks performs best with single-core speed. An overclock can reach 5GHz on the 8700K, giving even more power. Gaming also offers a slight edge over Intel chips. Bigger chips work better with overclocking. This makes the ~$80-100 benefit worthwhile.
It's interesting how a $100 difference can make such a big impact. While the 8700K is solid for gaming now, the idea of "best value" really depends on what you're looking for.
Op represents the majority—about 90%—who are aware of the dangers of overclocking or opt out entirely. Overclocking remains uncommon and carries significant risks; we must also highlight its limitations before suggesting it.
It's accurate that I'm willing to invest more than $250, but I was considering saving around $90 to possibly upgrade another part. Initially, I intended to purchase a 2060 super, though I might opt for a 2070 super or switch to an AIO instead of an air cooler. I value everyone's feedback and was trying to determine if there were overlooked options between the 8700k and 9700k that could justify the extra cost. My current budget is approximately $1600, which includes a monitor, leaving about $1200 for the PC.
For the latest software versions, the GPU handles most of the processing. The CPU plays a smaller role now compared to the GPU. This applies to models like the Ryzen 2700X, which offers strong value at around $150 with compatible motherboards for $50.
I agree and will be arriving from a 4790k. It seems any recommended CPU would be better than what I’m used to. Thanks for the feedback!
Claims the overclocked CPU from the factory offers a straightforward path to 5GHz, while a budget Aorus Elite Z390 can achieve it easily. The i7 8700K is considered better than the i7 9700K because of its Hyper-Threading and efficient resource sharing. It tends to perform more smoothly in terms of productivity while maintaining strong single-core speed. The 8700K will challenge the 3700X effectively for the desired results, delivering better gaming when idle. It’s a solid choice for value, though pushing the 3700X feels like an AMD limitation. The idea of it being a "dead platform" doesn’t hold much weight since AM4 is also nearing its end, and either model should last long enough for future upgrades.
It was unexpected that my CPU struggled beyond 4.8GHz steady until I replaced it. This highlights why I caution against suggesting "guaranteed" overclocking, since such boosts are never truly assured.