F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Comparison of 3rd gen and 10th gen CB15 performance highlights key differences in power, efficiency, and handling.

Comparison of 3rd gen and 10th gen CB15 performance highlights key differences in power, efficiency, and handling.

Comparison of 3rd gen and 10th gen CB15 performance highlights key differences in power, efficiency, and handling.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
K
Kas_2002
Junior Member
Find
6
09-21-2016, 05:18 PM
#1
Take a look at this setup. I have a new Lenovo T14s for professional use with an i5 10310U and 4 cores/8 threads, paired with an i5 3317U with 2 cores/4 threads in the CB15. The architecture is 22nm versus 14nm+++. It handles multi-threaded tasks well. The clock speed is around 2666MHz, and it's running at 1x8GB RAM.
Reply
Reply
K
Kas_2002
09-21-2016, 05:18 PM #1

Take a look at this setup. I have a new Lenovo T14s for professional use with an i5 10310U and 4 cores/8 threads, paired with an i5 3317U with 2 cores/4 threads in the CB15. The architecture is 22nm versus 14nm+++. It handles multi-threaded tasks well. The clock speed is around 2666MHz, and it's running at 1x8GB RAM.

Reply
Reply
K
ko16654
Member
Find
121
09-21-2016, 07:11 PM
#2
Also take into account the distinction between clock frequency and boost.
Reply
Reply
K
ko16654
09-21-2016, 07:11 PM #2

Also take into account the distinction between clock frequency and boost.

Reply
Reply
T
Toodaloo_246
Senior Member
Find
439
10-08-2016, 10:54 PM
#3
I do. Take a look at single threaded.
Reply
Reply
T
Toodaloo_246
10-08-2016, 10:54 PM #3

I do. Take a look at single threaded.

Reply
Reply
E
Ender_Craft47
Posting Freak
Find
866
10-09-2016, 12:29 AM
#4
Great, it performs almost twice as well.
Reply
Reply
E
Ender_Craft47
10-09-2016, 12:29 AM #4

Great, it performs almost twice as well.

Reply
Reply
S
Shardgale
Senior Member
Find
547
10-13-2016, 08:40 AM
#5
Comparison between 2.6 and 4.4ghz shows limited differences.
Reply
Reply
S
Shardgale
10-13-2016, 08:40 AM #5

Comparison between 2.6 and 4.4ghz shows limited differences.

Reply
Reply
C
CQC_Apocalypse
Member
Find
84
10-14-2016, 10:16 AM
#6
Indeed, the technology available then allowed for high clock speeds through overclocking, and reaching 5GHz on Sandy Bridge was possible.
Reply
Reply
C
CQC_Apocalypse
10-14-2016, 10:16 AM #6

Indeed, the technology available then allowed for high clock speeds through overclocking, and reaching 5GHz on Sandy Bridge was possible.

Reply
Reply
E
EliasIQ
Junior Member
Find
4
10-14-2016, 10:24 AM
#7
still lagging behind a 3720QM from 2012, not very impressive considering you can find a used HP Elitebook from that time with that chip for a fraction of the cost today.
Reply
Reply
E
EliasIQ
10-14-2016, 10:24 AM #7

still lagging behind a 3720QM from 2012, not very impressive considering you can find a used HP Elitebook from that time with that chip for a fraction of the cost today.

Reply
Reply
N
NottaSpy
Member
Find
232
10-17-2016, 03:03 PM
#8
Great news! It’s available at no cost. This device works perfectly with a Samsung NVMe SSD.
Reply
Reply
N
NottaSpy
10-17-2016, 03:03 PM #8

Great news! It’s available at no cost. This device works perfectly with a Samsung NVMe SSD.

Reply
Reply
K
kungfutyla
Posting Freak
Find
780
10-24-2016, 09:31 PM
#9
Absolutely correct, a free laptop is unbeatable, and adding a Samsung NVMe SSD would significantly boost performance for everyday tasks.
Reply
Reply
K
kungfutyla
10-24-2016, 09:31 PM #9

Absolutely correct, a free laptop is unbeatable, and adding a Samsung NVMe SSD would significantly boost performance for everyday tasks.

Reply
Reply
T
TheMinemee
Junior Member
Find
26
10-30-2016, 05:45 AM
#10
It's just unexpected the CPU didn't improve much even with the latest model.
Reply
Reply
T
TheMinemee
10-30-2016, 05:45 AM #10

It's just unexpected the CPU didn't improve much even with the latest model.

Reply
Reply
Pages (2): 1 2 Next