F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Comparison of 3600 CL16 and 3733 CL17 models

Comparison of 3600 CL16 and 3733 CL17 models

Comparison of 3600 CL16 and 3733 CL17 models

X
xX_IceyWolf_Xx
Senior Member
629
07-05-2019, 11:58 PM
#1
Comparing the two options for your Ryzen 7 3700X. The first model offers dual 16GB DDR4 3600 CL16, while the second has dual 16GB DDR4 3733 CL17. Which provides better performance depends on your specific needs and budget.
X
xX_IceyWolf_Xx
07-05-2019, 11:58 PM #1

Comparing the two options for your Ryzen 7 3700X. The first model offers dual 16GB DDR4 3600 CL16, while the second has dual 16GB DDR4 3733 CL17. Which provides better performance depends on your specific needs and budget.

F
Farcowz
Junior Member
35
07-15-2019, 04:35 AM
#2
You don't necessarily need 3600mhz. 3200mhz works just as well.
F
Farcowz
07-15-2019, 04:35 AM #2

You don't necessarily need 3600mhz. 3200mhz works just as well.

P
parking2525
Member
118
07-15-2019, 06:54 AM
#3
no such 3200mhz 14cl is offered at my location
P
parking2525
07-15-2019, 06:54 AM #3

no such 3200mhz 14cl is offered at my location

J
JIMBOWz
Member
236
07-21-2019, 12:31 AM
#4
He receives a 3700X rating, which performs well across 3600/3733 MHz and up to 3800 MHz if conditions are favorable. Options include a 4000 MHz Viper Steel or a Teamgroup setup, operating at tight 3600-3800 frequencies. For an XMP profile, 3733 Viper Steel remains the best choice despite its appearance.
J
JIMBOWz
07-21-2019, 12:31 AM #4

He receives a 3700X rating, which performs well across 3600/3733 MHz and up to 3800 MHz if conditions are favorable. Options include a 4000 MHz Viper Steel or a Teamgroup setup, operating at tight 3600-3800 frequencies. For an XMP profile, 3733 Viper Steel remains the best choice despite its appearance.

W
wolfcore10
Junior Member
29
07-21-2019, 04:14 AM
#5
I believe the numbers point to 3600 16-19-19-39 compared with 3733 17-21-21-41. When using their respective XMP profiles and operating at half the data rate, the results align. I've noticed CPUs that struggle at 1866MHz FCLK, so even a 3733MHz board would need to be reduced to 3600. Lowering FCLK isn't feasible without sacrificing performance, though tuning capabilities remain consistent.
W
wolfcore10
07-21-2019, 04:14 AM #5

I believe the numbers point to 3600 16-19-19-39 compared with 3733 17-21-21-41. When using their respective XMP profiles and operating at half the data rate, the results align. I've noticed CPUs that struggle at 1866MHz FCLK, so even a 3733MHz board would need to be reduced to 3600. Lowering FCLK isn't feasible without sacrificing performance, though tuning capabilities remain consistent.

T
Tjeard_
Member
179
07-28-2019, 04:44 AM
#6
There are improvements, yet 3200mhz remains acceptable. I'm using a standard CL16. Unless you're doing manual tuning, targeting specific chips like Hyundai CJR, Samsung B-die or essential E-die doesn't matter.
T
Tjeard_
07-28-2019, 04:44 AM #6

There are improvements, yet 3200mhz remains acceptable. I'm using a standard CL16. Unless you're doing manual tuning, targeting specific chips like Hyundai CJR, Samsung B-die or essential E-die doesn't matter.

P
pantoufle06
Member
165
08-05-2019, 02:49 AM
#7
3733Mhz CL17 has a latency of 9.1 ns, while CL16 offers 8.9 ns. I’d prefer the 3600 figure: (2000 multiplied by each CL value) divided by MHz.
P
pantoufle06
08-05-2019, 02:49 AM #7

3733Mhz CL17 has a latency of 9.1 ns, while CL16 offers 8.9 ns. I’d prefer the 3600 figure: (2000 multiplied by each CL value) divided by MHz.