Comparing TV cable coax and 5G for Wi-Fi (POLL)
Comparing TV cable coax and 5G for Wi-Fi (POLL)
I reside in a vintage home constructed in the 1960s in Stockholm, Sweden. The property lacks modern fiber internet and relies on an outdated coaxial cable for connectivity. The neighborhood is labeled "K-märkt" – a term indicating it holds cultural significance requiring preservation. This limits future upgrades, forcing me to pay roughly $30 USD monthly for 100 Mbit/s using an older coax router. On the roof of the nearby building, new 5G antennas were recently added, providing about 600 Mbit/s via cellular data when I use my phone. Our household consists of four members, each with personal devices; we primarily stream high-definition content rather than engage in gaming.
You're facing restrictions due to the 100Mbps coaxial link. A 5G connection could significantly improve your experience, as long as the $50 per month remains within your budget. Starlink offers speeds between 100-200Mbps for $120 per month, but you still need a clear line of sight to get the best performance. Having an existing strong 5G signal nearby makes switching worthwhile.