F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Comparing the 5200MHz CL40 and the 6000MHz CL30 models.

Comparing the 5200MHz CL40 and the 6000MHz CL30 models.

Comparing the 5200MHz CL40 and the 6000MHz CL30 models.

L
ljp812
Junior Member
49
05-03-2025, 02:03 AM
#1
The performance gap between the 5200MHZ CL40 and 6000MHz CL30 is noticeable, especially in AMD or Intel configurations. An EXPO profile suits Intel, while an XMP profile works well for AMD.
L
ljp812
05-03-2025, 02:03 AM #1

The performance gap between the 5200MHZ CL40 and 6000MHz CL30 is noticeable, especially in AMD or Intel configurations. An EXPO profile suits Intel, while an XMP profile works well for AMD.

S
SoulzReaped
Member
217
05-03-2025, 04:51 AM
#2
The actual impact is similar to a 10 fps variation within the ~150 FPS range when CPU constrained. More RAM helps but isn't essential. I can locate both XMP and EXPO settings most of the time, though performance may differ and compatibility varies. Most RAM packages include both versions.
S
SoulzReaped
05-03-2025, 04:51 AM #2

The actual impact is similar to a 10 fps variation within the ~150 FPS range when CPU constrained. More RAM helps but isn't essential. I can locate both XMP and EXPO settings most of the time, though performance may differ and compatibility varies. Most RAM packages include both versions.

S
ShantzPantz
Junior Member
21
05-03-2025, 09:32 AM
#3
The effect varies based on workload and hardware specs. For non-X3D CPUs, differences are more pronounced, potentially doubling performance (10-20%) if CPU is the bottleneck. X3D CPUs show lower single-core gains (1-5%), but still fluctuate. Consistent frame rates matter most. Intel 13th-14th generations are affected more than X3D, but less than non-X3D models. No clear scaling guidance found for Arrow Lake yet.
S
ShantzPantz
05-03-2025, 09:32 AM #3

The effect varies based on workload and hardware specs. For non-X3D CPUs, differences are more pronounced, potentially doubling performance (10-20%) if CPU is the bottleneck. X3D CPUs show lower single-core gains (1-5%), but still fluctuate. Consistent frame rates matter most. Intel 13th-14th generations are affected more than X3D, but less than non-X3D models. No clear scaling guidance found for Arrow Lake yet.

I
Ian2003
Junior Member
16
05-03-2025, 05:54 PM
#4
Relies on workload and processor speed. Similar to Cinebench results, games often show ~15% improvement with 6000CL30 depending on CPU and game. Yes. EXPO and XMP serve the same purpose but are saved in different areas of the SPD. If one isn't functioning, it's likely a BIOS problem; updating the BIOS will resolve it. Early AM5 boards couldn't use XMP, but this changed with the third BIOS update.
I
Ian2003
05-03-2025, 05:54 PM #4

Relies on workload and processor speed. Similar to Cinebench results, games often show ~15% improvement with 6000CL30 depending on CPU and game. Yes. EXPO and XMP serve the same purpose but are saved in different areas of the SPD. If one isn't functioning, it's likely a BIOS problem; updating the BIOS will resolve it. Early AM5 boards couldn't use XMP, but this changed with the third BIOS update.

R
Ranaku
Member
51
05-05-2025, 01:58 PM
#5
It depends on your game choice. If you're playing multiplayer titles such as PUGBG, 6000C30 can help you make significant progress.
R
Ranaku
05-05-2025, 01:58 PM #5

It depends on your game choice. If you're playing multiplayer titles such as PUGBG, 6000C30 can help you make significant progress.

B
224
05-06-2025, 06:53 PM
#6
I don't agree; faster and optimized RAM can boost performance by up to 20% in low usage, making games run smoother and more enjoyable.
B
Buddy_The_Hero
05-06-2025, 06:53 PM #6

I don't agree; faster and optimized RAM can boost performance by up to 20% in low usage, making games run smoother and more enjoyable.