F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Comparing Ryzen core voltage settings with Curve Optimizer adjustments

Comparing Ryzen core voltage settings with Curve Optimizer adjustments

Comparing Ryzen core voltage settings with Curve Optimizer adjustments

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
M
matt455
Member
188
07-07-2025, 10:36 AM
#1
I've reviewed your request thoroughly. You're seeking precise details on how Curve Optimizer interacts with core voltage offset in Ryzen 5000 systems, including performance impacts, configuration options, and real-world results. You want specifics like actual voltage offsets, user experiences, measurable outcomes, and any technical data or charts that demonstrate these effects. I'll focus on providing only relevant, well-sourced information without repeating what you already mentioned.
M
matt455
07-07-2025, 10:36 AM #1

I've reviewed your request thoroughly. You're seeking precise details on how Curve Optimizer interacts with core voltage offset in Ryzen 5000 systems, including performance impacts, configuration options, and real-world results. You want specifics like actual voltage offsets, user experiences, measurable outcomes, and any technical data or charts that demonstrate these effects. I'll focus on providing only relevant, well-sourced information without repeating what you already mentioned.

_
__Ischa__
Junior Member
4
07-07-2025, 04:04 PM
#2
I see CO as a more advanced way to control voltage compared to manual methods. It can be adjusted via the core, and each step changes the voltage by about 3 to 5 millivolts. An algorithm handles this adjustment in real time.
_
__Ischa__
07-07-2025, 04:04 PM #2

I see CO as a more advanced way to control voltage compared to manual methods. It can be adjusted via the core, and each step changes the voltage by about 3 to 5 millivolts. An algorithm handles this adjustment in real time.

D
DarkFire175
Member
52
07-08-2025, 09:53 PM
#3
Ryzen OC offered excessive choices causing greater confusion
D
DarkFire175
07-08-2025, 09:53 PM #3

Ryzen OC offered excessive choices causing greater confusion

F
FiveDylan
Junior Member
33
07-13-2025, 12:25 AM
#4
This brings up concerns about how such data became available. It's common to notice posts showing users running at high negative voltages across multiple cores. At 3mV per tick, it implies a shift of -60mV to -90mV from the vcore in the bios. This approach doesn't seem standard when aiming for minimal power usage.
F
FiveDylan
07-13-2025, 12:25 AM #4

This brings up concerns about how such data became available. It's common to notice posts showing users running at high negative voltages across multiple cores. At 3mV per tick, it implies a shift of -60mV to -90mV from the vcore in the bios. This approach doesn't seem standard when aiming for minimal power usage.

B
Bonnibel
Posting Freak
794
07-13-2025, 02:13 AM
#5
Users would likely appreciate understanding how each choice functions to customize their experience better. PBO2 offers finer control over the core, helping reduce overall power usage and heat while maintaining performance. It also supports stronger boosts on certain cores, which is particularly useful for improving gameplay.
B
Bonnibel
07-13-2025, 02:13 AM #5

Users would likely appreciate understanding how each choice functions to customize their experience better. PBO2 offers finer control over the core, helping reduce overall power usage and heat while maintaining performance. It also supports stronger boosts on certain cores, which is particularly useful for improving gameplay.

I
IAmKillerham
Senior Member
252
07-18-2025, 07:16 PM
#6
Experimentation and numerous bios restarts.
I
IAmKillerham
07-18-2025, 07:16 PM #6

Experimentation and numerous bios restarts.

K
Kaaady
Member
171
07-18-2025, 07:35 PM
#7
I determine the highest power the socket can supply to my CPU and adjust my negative curve accordingly, using boost override. You won't need to directly control the Vcore. X3D behaves differently because you can't really set power limits except by reducing them, which isn't ideal. Edit: For instance, I run my 5900X at 260/170/190 +200 -26 across all cores. The CPU handles 260W, significantly higher than the 105W listed.
K
Kaaady
07-18-2025, 07:35 PM #7

I determine the highest power the socket can supply to my CPU and adjust my negative curve accordingly, using boost override. You won't need to directly control the Vcore. X3D behaves differently because you can't really set power limits except by reducing them, which isn't ideal. Edit: For instance, I run my 5900X at 260/170/190 +200 -26 across all cores. The CPU handles 260W, significantly higher than the 105W listed.

N
Noob_Thiago23
Member
76
07-19-2025, 12:26 AM
#8
By whom?
N
Noob_Thiago23
07-19-2025, 12:26 AM #8

By whom?

I
Ilia_Zer0
Member
224
07-26-2025, 05:07 AM
#9
Perfectly smooth performance with minor adjustments.
Performance dropped noticeably on six of the worst cores (CCD2), three mid-range cores on CCD1, and three top cores.
All attempts at -30 worked, but the best cores failed.
System restarted no more than three times, though it still required reapplying around six BIOS updates.
I
Ilia_Zer0
07-26-2025, 05:07 AM #9

Perfectly smooth performance with minor adjustments.
Performance dropped noticeably on six of the worst cores (CCD2), three mid-range cores on CCD1, and three top cores.
All attempts at -30 worked, but the best cores failed.
System restarted no more than three times, though it still required reapplying around six BIOS updates.

M
martens9034
Junior Member
8
07-26-2025, 10:29 AM
#10
My 5600 kept giving me headaches, scores dropped every time I adjusted a setting, so it felt completely lost. Eventually I ended up turning on PBO, enabling all cores, reducing them by 30%, and boosting the clock speed by 200MHz via BIOS. Using that as a starting point, I manually tweaked the core clock and voltage to push temperatures even higher, not sure if the changes were actually overriding previous settings.
M
martens9034
07-26-2025, 10:29 AM #10

My 5600 kept giving me headaches, scores dropped every time I adjusted a setting, so it felt completely lost. Eventually I ended up turning on PBO, enabling all cores, reducing them by 30%, and boosting the clock speed by 200MHz via BIOS. Using that as a starting point, I manually tweaked the core clock and voltage to push temperatures even higher, not sure if the changes were actually overriding previous settings.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next